Archived operational intelligence briefing
DTG: 2025-12-18 09:37Z
RF kinetic operations are focused on maximizing logistics friction to capitalize on the breach at Herasymivka.
RF maintains fixing operations through airpower, preventing UAF freedom of maneuver.
Threat Level: CRITICAL (Deep Strike Synchronization and Preparation for Armored Breakout)
1. Kinetic Priority Shift (HIGH Confidence): RF has achieved a confirmed operational success in degrading Southern logistics via the Artsyz strike. This denial of electric rail traction until 26 December significantly impacts UAF ability to rapidly reinforce the Zaporizhzhia sector via massed rail transport. Subsequent drone activity in Odesa (09:17Z) suggests RF is likely assessing BDA and targeting any contingency routes.
2. Internal Security and Strategic Sabotage (HIGH Confidence): The heavy sentencing (22 years) of the BAM saboteur (09:17Z, 09:25Z) underscores RF preoccupation with internal threats to critical transport infrastructure. While not directly kinetic on the Ukraine front, successful sabotage on the BAM stresses internal RF military logistics chains, potentially limiting rotation/reinforcement capacity from Eastern Military Districts over time.
3. Tsentr Group Activity (MEDIUM Confidence): The RF claim of eliminating a UAF rotation group (09:05Z) suggests active interdiction of UAF movements, likely in the sectors facing the Pokrovsk salient. This indicates RF continues to contest UAF ability to manage troop rotation and reinforcement cycles.
1. Critical Diplomatic Momentum (HIGH Confidence): President Zelenskyy's arrival in Brussels (09:10Z, 09:14Z) and the explicit commitment by EC President Von der Leyen to secure the 2-year financing decision today (09:07Z) represents a major positive development for UAF sustainment and operational planning. The President’s linkage of Kupyansk successes to diplomatic leverage is an effective strategic messaging effort (09:11Z).
2. Tactical Adaptability (MEDIUM Confidence): Documented UAF tactical success (09:03Z) highlights the effective integration of drone warfare and established defensive engineering doctrine to offset RF quantitative advantages.
3. Internal Governance Posture (HIGH Confidence): Zelenskyy clarified his position on elections under martial law, supporting online presidential voting for the diaspora but opposing parliamentary and local elections (09:05Z). This maintains political continuity while minimizing internal disruption during active conflict.
4. Strategic Posture on ZNPP (LOW Confidence): A pro-RF source claimed Zelenskyy rejected a purported US proposal for tripartite (US, RF, UA) management of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (09:17Z). While unconfirmed, this aligns with Ukraine's consistent refusal to legitimize RF control of strategic assets.
1. PSYOPS Targeting Morale (HIGH Confidence): RF propaganda is actively disseminating high-impact psychological operations (PSYOPS) using captured UAF soldiers (09:01Z) and narratives criticizing the neglect of wounded UAF personnel (09:21Z). These messages aim to fracture internal cohesion, erode military morale, and deter mobilization efforts.
2. Aggressive Domestic Mobilization Messaging (HIGH Confidence): Visual evidence of military contract advertising directly on kindergarten doors in the Tyumen region (09:21Z) illustrates the extreme lengths RF military recruiters are employing, suggesting increasing pressure to fill manpower requirements, possibly indicating difficulty reaching mobilization quotas through less overt means.
3. Electoral Narrative Manipulation (HIGH Confidence): RF channels are quickly framing Zelenskyy’s conditional support for online presidential elections as the act of a "military dictator" (09:35Z), attempting to undermine the legitimacy of potential future elections and fuel domestic political dissent.
MLCOA (Most Likely Course of Action): Continuation of Deep Interdiction and Bridgehead Fortification. HIGH CONFIDENCE. RF forces will exploit the confirmed logistics denial in Odesa by continuing high-volume kinetic strikes (KABs/missiles) targeting C2 and reserve staging areas (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipro/Kharkiv) through NLT 1800Z. RF Vostok Group will prioritize consolidating the 1km bridgehead west of the Gaychur River, likely deploying short-range air defense and preparing necessary crossing infrastructure (e.g., reinforcing existing bridges or establishing pontoon bridges) for heavy armor penetration.
MDCOA (Most Dangerous Course of Action): Coordinated Operational Decapitation Strike. MEDIUM CONFIDENCE. Utilizing the operational noise generated by the widespread KAB campaign, RF launches a concentrated strike (potentially hypersonic or ballistic missiles) targeting UAF strategic reserves or a forward UAF operational command post in the Poltava or Dnipro regions, simultaneous with the introduction of heavy armor across the Gaychur River at Herasymivka (NLT 1400Z). The objective is to paralyze UAF response capacity against the armored breakthrough.
| Priority | Gap Description | Requirement / Tasking | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 (CRITICAL) | Confirmation of heavy armor (MBT/IFV) crossing the Gaychur River at Herasymivka. | GEOINT/ISR (Southern Command): Continuous monitoring for heavy tracks, MBT/IFV concentrations, or pontoon bridge construction west of the river. | Provides the trigger for committing strategic reserves and validates the MDCOA timeline. |
| P2 (CRITICAL) | BDA verification of recent high-speed target impact/location near Zaporizhzhia (09:14Z). | IMINT/HUMINT (Central Command): Rapid BDA on military targets (barracks, depots, C2) or critical infrastructure hit in Zaporizhzhia district. | Assess RF ability to degrade C2/logistics critical to the Southern defense. |
| P3 (URGENT) | Status of diesel locomotive capacity and operational feasibility on the Artsyz rail line. | J4 Logistics/TECHINT: Determine if immediate deployment of diesel traction is viable or if track damage is extensive enough to halt all rail traffic. | Assess the effectiveness of the RF logistics denial and determine UAF supply constraint severity. |
| P4 (PRIORITY) | Identification of specific units involved in the UAF drone/engineering success (09:03Z). | HUMINT/SIGINT (J2/Eastern Command): Identify which UAF formation achieved the localized success to extract best practices and doctrine. | Improve UAF force protection and tactical adaptation doctrine. |
We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.
Learn more in our Privacy Policy.