Archived operational intelligence briefing
DTG: 2025-12-15T20:35Z
| Sector | Current Status | Key Activities / Changes | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk | High Kinetic Threat | Confirmed repeated KAB strikes. Follow-on strikes are exploiting recent ISR data collected over GLOCs and staging areas. | HIGH |
| Dnipropetrovsk Oblast | Critical ISR Activity | RF reconnaissance/strike UAVs are rapidly vectoring towards high-value targets: Dnipro City, and the vulnerable Nikopol district (across the Kakhovka Reservoir line). | HIGH |
| Kharkiv Oblast (South) | Expanding Reconnaissance | RF UAV activity is extending westward, now tracked toward Barvinkove. This suggests a broader effort to detect logistics flowing toward the Pokrovsk axis. | HIGH |
| Luhansk (Siversk Area) | Persistent Heavy Contact | Bilohorivka remains under severe kinetic pressure, consistent with the reported deterioration of the Siversk sector (PDR context). | MEDIUM |
| Deep Rear (RF Territory) | Active UAF Interdiction | RF reports confirm UAF deep-strike persistence, with at least 10 UAVs engaged and reportedly destroyed over Bryansk Oblast. | HIGH |
1. Kinetic Exploitation Synchronization: RF forces immediately leveraged the extensive multi-vector UAV ISR sweeps reported in the previous sitrep (Kharkiv) and are now expanding them into Dnipropetrovsk (Nikopol, Dnipro City). This ISR is rapidly followed by KAB launches (Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk). This high-tempo cycle indicates an intent to achieve Decide-Target-Engage timelines faster than UAF C2 cycles, aiming for continuous attrition of UAF logistics and C2 nodes.
2. Threat to Dnipro City and Nikopol: The multiple UAV tracks converging on Dnipro City and Nikopol District represent an elevated threat.
3. Intent in Deep Rear: The claimed mass interception of 10 UAF UAVs over Bryansk suggests UAF is maintaining a high operational tempo against military and industrial targets deep inside RF territory, likely seeking to fix RF air defense assets or degrade logistical sustainment for frontline forces.
Strategic Alignment and Negotiating Posture: UAF leadership (KMVA) continues to refine the strategic negotiating position, emphasizing three key requirements:
Frontline Operations: UAF continues localized resistance and extraction operations in heavily contested areas such as Bilohorivka, demonstrating tactical endurance despite severe kinetic effects. UAF Deep Strike capabilities remain operational, confirmed by RF counter-UAV activity in Bryansk.
1. US Mediation Narrative Dominance: The primary shift is the abrupt influx of US political commentary (Trump), placing immediate emphasis on settlement and mediation. This narrative, amplified by both Russian (TASS) and Ukrainian media, introduces high uncertainty into the security framework timeline. The proposed US mediation structure (direct calls, Miami meeting) positions the US as the principal arbiter.
2. RF Counter-Guarantee IO: RF channels (Colonelcassad) are actively disseminating highly biased narratives mocking the EU security guarantee proposals, characterizing the multinational presence as destined for military defeat ("corpses"). This aims to undermine confidence in the collective Western security commitment.
3. Financial Pressure IO: Germany's explicit warning that the EU risks its financial stability if it fails to support a Ukraine reparation loan (leveraging frozen RF assets) creates internal diplomatic pressure within the EU, which RF IO will attempt to exploit to showcase Western disunity.
MLCOA (Coordinated Deep Strike and Penetration - HIGH Confidence): RF forces will execute precision strikes, likely utilizing high-explosive drones (Shahed) or missile systems, against targets identified in the current Dnipropetrovsk ISR sweep (e.g., logistical nodes near Dnipro City, UAF forward positions in Nikopol district). Concurrently, RF will attempt to expand the kinetic footprint toward Barvinkove to stress UAF logistics feeding the Eastern axis.
MDCOA (Strategic Diplomatic Shock - MEDIUM Confidence): Following the announced high-level calls, a public statement or initial "peace plan" proposal could emerge from the US side. Given the KMVA's acknowledged difference with Russia on territories, any US proposal not fully aligned with Ukrainian territorial integrity principles could create immediate strategic friction, potentially forcing UAF diplomatic resources to shift focus from security guarantees to managing territorial expectations.
| Priority | Gap Description | Required Action / Information Need | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 (CRITICAL) | Dnipropetrovsk Targeting Intent. Determine the specific targets of the UAV tracks (Dnipro City, Nikopol) to predict the immediate kinetic follow-up (i.e., C2/fuel depots vs. localized AD suppression). | Task J2/J3 EW and AD assets to analyze RF C2 traffic accompanying UAV flights and assess flight profiles. | NLT 00:00Z Dec 16. |
| P2 (CRITICAL) | Novorossiysk Submarine BDA. (Unchanged) Resolve the IO conflict. Determine the actual damage assessment to RF vessels/infrastructure in Novorossiysk. | Task IMINT/HUMINT assets for verification. | NLT 08:00Z Dec 16. |
| P3 (URGENT) | Huliaipole Maneuver Commitment. Quantify the mechanized elements committed to the advance toward Huliaipole and identify the proximity of RF heavy artillery supporting the push from the Gaychur bridgehead. (Unchanged, linked to P1 above) | Task IMINT/SAR to assess RF deployment density in the triangle Peschanoye-Huliaipole. | NLT 06:00Z Dec 16. |
| P4 (PRIORITY) | Barvinkove Threat Assessment. Determine if the UAV track toward Barvinkove is ISR preparatory for kinetic strike or solely route-testing for future GLOC interdiction operations. | Task UAF units in Barvinkove area to increase local sensor coverage and readiness for KAB/missile strike. | NLT 02:00Z Dec 16. |
Actionable Recommendations:
We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.
Learn more in our Privacy Policy.