Archived operational intelligence briefing
DTG: 2025-12-15T00:10Z PRIORITY: CRITICAL (Air Attrition and IO Exploitation)
The primary change since 23:10Z involves the Information Environment, with a notable international incident being immediately leveraged by Russian state media. The kinetic assessment remains driven by the previous air attack vectors.
The operational picture remains dominated by the multi-vector air attrition campaign identified in the previous sitrep. The Central Axis and Southern Axis (Odesa) are currently the primary targets for RF UAV swarms.
| Sector | Assessment | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Southern Axis (Odesa) | Threat Engaged | UAF Air Defense (AD) assets remain engaged against the confirmed UAV swarm approaching Odesa from the Black Sea. |
| Central Axis (Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava) | High Risk | Sustained pressure continues, targeting critical infrastructure. The potential for a forward RF launch posture near Krasnohrad Raion (UNCONFIRMED) remains a primary tactical concern, reducing warning time. |
| Eastern Axis (Donetsk) | Force Consolidation | RF forces are likely in a local pause near Pokrovsk/Hryshyne, awaiting the confirmed surge of artillery materiel from the 260th GRAU (SAR Activity: CRITICAL). |
| Information Domain | Exploitation | RF IO is rapidly capitalizing on the Sydney incident to manage domestic opinion and elevate the justification for retaliation. |
Current Threat Level: CRITICAL (Multi-Directional Air Saturation and IO Escalation)
UAF AD posture remains highly reactive, engaging threats on multiple axes. Operational focus must balance immediate air defense requirements with the urgent need for tactical reconnaissance (IMINT/SIGINT) to confirm the Krasnohrad launch claim and track the 260th GRAU logistical outflow.
The core narrative shifted momentarily to a high-profile international tragedy, immediately exploited by competing IO narratives:
Assessment: The rapid exploitation of the Sydney incident demonstrates the RF capability to shift public attention and generate strategic deflection from adverse events (such as the successful UAF SEAD strikes in Crimea and the deep strike on the Uryupinsk oil depot).
MLCOA (Most Likely Course of Action): UAV Attrition and Central Penetration (UNCHANGED) RF will continue the current air campaign using UAVs, prioritizing infrastructure penetration on the Central Axis (Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava) until approximately 04:00Z. The key driver is maximizing UAF AD expenditure and locating the unconfirmed forward launch site near Krasnohrad.
MDCOA (Most Dangerous Course of Action): Retaliatory High-Speed Strike (RISK REMAINS HIGH) RF launches high-speed missiles (Kinzhals, Iskanders, or Kalibrs) targeting strategic logistics hubs (e.g., Dnipro railway junction, Zaporizhzhia C2 facilities) during the pre-dawn hours (01:00Z - 04:00Z). The prior IO escalation ("Moscow breach") and the newly framed global "terrorism" narrative provide RF the necessary domestic political cover for an indiscriminate, high-casualty retaliatory strike.
Recommendation: UAF J3 must ensure Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) in the Dnipro/Zaporizhzhia area maintain maximum alert status and reserve high-value interceptors (SAM) for potential ballistic/cruise threats, resisting the urge to expend them on peripheral UAV swarms.
| Priority | Gap / Request | Justification / Need |
|---|---|---|
| P1 (CRITICAL) | UAV Launch Origin Validation (Krasnohrad Raion) | Immediate IMINT/SIGINT required to verify the RF claim regarding UAV launches near Krasnohrad. Confirmation dictates an immediate shift in UAF AD and counter-launch tactics to target mobile teams. |
| P1 (CRITICAL) | 260th GRAU Outflow Vector | Immediate verification of rail material destination (Volnovakha vs. Ilovaisk) is required to predict the axis of the RF artillery main effort (expected 24-48 hours). |
| P2 (URGENT) | Belgorod BDA Confirmation | Immediate IMINT required to conclusively determine the munition type and exact impact location to rebut escalating RF IO narratives concerning alleged UAF targeting of civilian areas. |
| P3 (PRIORITY) | Information Environment Analysis (Sydney Impact) | Analyze the correlation between RF amplification of the Sydney incident and potential domestic hybrid threats targeting stability (e.g., anti-TCC protests or false flag operations), especially in Odesa. |
We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.
Learn more in our Privacy Policy.