Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-12-14 23:11:12Z
2 months ago
Previous (2025-12-14 22:41:12Z)

Situation Update (UTC)

DTG: 2025-12-14T23:10Z PRIORITY: CRITICAL (Sustained Multi-Vector Air Attrition)

Key updates since last sitrep

  • (22:53Z, Air Force ZSU): Renewed UAV activity confirmed inbound toward Odesa city, launched from the Black Sea. This fully reactivates the Southern Air Vector, necessitating coverage on three critical, disparate axes (Southern, Central, Northern). (HIGH confidence)
  • (22:46Z, НгП раZVедка): RF sources claim the primary launch area for UAVs targeting the central axis (Kremenchuk/Pyatykhatky) is the Krasnohrad Raion, Kharkiv Oblast, near the border with Poltava. This suggests a forward-deployed/highly mobile RF launch component. (MEDIUM confidence)
  • (22:55Z, Операция Z): RF state media/milbloggers escalated the deep strike narrative, claiming UAF forces are attempting to "break through to Moscow." This is highly hyperbolic IO intended to domestically justify retaliation. (LOW confidence on claim veracity, HIGH confidence on IO intent)
  • (23:01Z, Colonelcassad): RF sources amplify claims of successful kinetic operations by a specific RF unit ("Anvar") against UAF fortifications and civilian infrastructure. Standard tactical victory claim amplification. (MEDIUM confidence)

Operational picture (by sector)

SectorAssessmentDetails
Southern Axis (Odesa)Threat ReactivatedUAV swarm confirmed approaching Odesa from the Black Sea. UAF AD assets are engaged. This requires rapid prioritization of coastal/port defense resources, potentially drawing assets away from the Dnipro region.
Central Axis (Kharkiv/Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk)Launch Location ClaimedRF claims launches originated near Krasnohrad Raion (Kharkiv). If confirmed, this shortens the flight path to Kremenchuk/Pyatykhatky, reducing warning time and complicating long-range radar detection. The central axis remains the primary target of RF air attrition.
Northern Axis (Sumy)Status Quo (Fixation)Previous threat assessment toward Sumy remains valid, continuing to act as a diversionary vector tying down UAF assets on the border.
Deep Rear (RF Territory)IO EscalationRF propaganda amplifying deep strike threats ("Moscow breach") alongside normalization efforts (TASS subsidized flights) to manage domestic public opinion.

Enemy activity / threat assessment

Current Threat Level: CRITICAL (Multi-Directional Air Saturation and IO Escalation)

  1. Air Attrition Strategy Confirmation: The simultaneous attack confirmation on Odesa (Southern) and the sustained pressure on the Central Axis (Kremenchuk/Pyatykhatky) validates the RF strategy of maximizing UAF AD dispersion and expenditure.
  2. Forward Launch Posture (Unconfirmed): The claimed use of Krasnohrad Raion as a launch site for Shaheds (22:46Z) is a significant tactical adaptation.
    • Analysis: If true, this moves the launch locus closer to key targets, allowing RF to use fewer assets to reach critical infrastructure and potentially bypassing the dense AD network surrounding the Northern/Eastern borders.
  3. Information Warfare Refinement: RF IO is aggressively transitioning from defensive narratives (e.g., refuting the Belgorod infrastructure strike) to offensive escalation ("Moscow breach"), which typically precedes or justifies a major retaliatory kinetic action (i.e., the MDCOA defined below).
  4. Enemy Capabilities: The consistent ability to launch sophisticated, multi-axis attacks, potentially utilizing forward-deployed mobile launch teams, demonstrates resilient logistics despite UAF deep strikes.

Friendly activity (UAF)

  • AD Posture: UAF AD C2 maintains high responsiveness, immediately tracking the renewed Odesa threat (22:53Z). Engagement protocols must now be dynamically adjusted to account for the simultaneous engagement on four vectors (Odesa, Kremenchuk, Pyatykhatky, Sumy).
  • Deep Strike Initiatives (Contextual): The confirmed RF IO escalation regarding "Moscow" attempts to undermine the perceived success and legitimacy of UAF deep strikes, particularly against strategic RF infrastructure (Uryupinsk oil depot, previous report).

Information environment / disinformation

  • Escalation Narrative: The "Moscow breach" claim (LOW confidence fact, HIGH confidence IO intent) is the highest escalation in RF deep strike messaging since the start of the current air campaign. It is designed to prepare the RF domestic audience for major, indiscriminate retaliation (e.g., mass missile strikes).
  • Normalization vs. War Footing: RF state media is running parallel narratives: TASS promoting domestic normalcy (subsidized flights) while milbloggers promote critical threat/escalation. This duality aims to maintain domestic morale while justifying further military action.

Outlook (next 6-12h)

MLCOA (Most Likely Course of Action): UAV Attrition and Central Penetration RF will continue to sustain the current UAV strike pattern until approximately 04:00Z. The central axis (Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava) remains the highest kinematic priority, likely supported by further waves originating from the claimed Krasnohrad area to maximize deep penetration and infrastructure damage (utilizing the newly identified 100kg Shahed variant, per Daily Report). Odesa remains a secondary target intended to fix coastal AD.

MDCOA (Most Dangerous Course of Action): Retaliatory High-Speed Strike RF leverages the IO narrative ("Moscow breach") and the strategic AD dispersion to launch high-speed ballistic or cruise missiles (Kalibr, Kinzhal, Iskander) targeting crucial logistical nodes or strategic C2 facilities in Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia, or Kryvyi Rih, while UAF AD resources are fixed by the UAV swarms on the periphery (Odesa, Sumy). This MDCOA is assessed as rising in likelihood due to the aggressive IO framing.

Recommendation: UAF J3 should immediately prioritize Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) to cover critical logistical choke points in Dnipro and Zaporizhzhia through the 01:00Z - 04:00Z window. Tactical commanders must confirm the launch origin claim in Krasnohrad Raion and, if validated, immediately adjust AD interception zones and pre-target RF mobile launch teams near the claimed location.

Intelligence gaps & collection requirements

PriorityGap / RequestJustification / Need
P1 (CRITICAL)UAV Launch Origin Validation (Krasnohrad Raion)Immediate IMINT/SIGINT/HUMINT required to verify the RF claim regarding UAV launches near Krasnohrad. Confirmation dictates an immediate shift in UAF AD and counter-launch tactics.
P1 (CRITICAL)260th GRAU Outflow Vector (UNCHANGED)Immediate verification of rail material destination (Volnovakha vs. Ilovaisk) is required to predict the axis of the RF artillery main effort (expected 24-48 hours). (Prev. SitRep P1)
P1 (CRITICAL)Belgorod BDA Confirmation (HIMARS Claim)Immediate IMINT/HUMINT required to determine the exact impact location and munition type used in the recent Belgorod strike to definitively rebut escalating RF IO narratives.
P2 (URGENT)Odesa UAV Target AssessmentAD reporting required to confirm the specific target type near Odesa (e.g., port infrastructure, grain terminal, energy transformer) to confirm RF prioritization.
P3 (URGENT)Huliaipole Ground Status (UNCHANGED)IMINT/HUMINT required immediately to verify if RF forces are transitioning from air shaping to a full-scale ground assault by the Vostok Grouping. (Persistent Gap)
Previous (2025-12-14 22:41:12Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.