Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (O-SITREP)

DTG: 121930Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: GRAU FIRE INITIATION IMMINENT // DEEP STRIKE THREAT ESCALATES // SKDH DEFENSE CRITICAL

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-SUM)

The operational situation around the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Hub (SKDH) is entering its most critical phase. The window for pre-empting the RF offensive by interdicting the 260th GRAU shipment is definitively closed (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE). All indicators point toward the initiation of massive preparatory fires NLT 130000Z DEC. Simultaneously, RF deep strike capability is threatening critical rear-area logistics.

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The RF operational objective remains the isolation and seizure of Kramatorsk and Slovyansk via dual axes (Siversk-Konstantinovka/Pokrovsk-Konstantinovka).

• Donbas Axis (SKDH): RF forces are posturing for mechanized exploitation following artillery saturation. UAF forces (110th, 92nd, 105th Brigades) have successfully annihilated an RF assault group in a localized counter-attack, demonstrating resilient tactical defense, likely near the Konstantinovka axis. (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Northern Axis (Kupyansk): The sector is stabilized (confirmed by UAF reports of NGU "Khartia" success and inadvertently confirmed by internal RF milblogger criticism of false reports). This stabilization frees limited UAF reserves for redeployment to the Donbas main effort.
• Deep Rear (Odesa/Pavlohrad): Shahed groups are confirmed inbound to Odesa (maritime logistics target) and Pavlohrad (Dnipropetrovsk region, critical rail/logistics hub). This indicates synchronized RF kinetic pressure against UAF deep sustainment lines ahead of the Donbas offensive. (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors

Scheduled national power blackouts remain the primary non-kinetic constraint. The RF IO narrative confirming power outages in Kramatorsk (19:03Z) suggests RF plans to exploit this factor psychologically and operationally during the assault.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces: Main effort units are concluding staging for the massed preparatory fire (GRAU). Immediate Air Force activity (KAB/Shahed) is focused on fixed defensive positions (Zaporizhzhia) and logistics chokepoints (Pavlohrad).
• UAF Forces: Maintaining high readiness for counter-battery operations and preparing secondary defensive belts. Confirmation of successful, localized joint UAF counter-attacks in Donbas (110th/92nd/105th) highlights troop cohesion despite high stress.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREATCON)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Intention: Initiate the decisive kinetic saturation phase in Donbas (GRAU) and prevent UAF rear-area mobilization using synchronized deep strikes.
• New Tactical Adaptation (Deep Strike/Hybrid): The confirmed shift in Shahed target focus to Pavlohrad signals RF intent to interdict critical Western-supplied logistics flows and internal UAF reinforcement routes during the Donbas fight. (JUDGMENT: RF seeks to achieve operational isolation not just geographically (SKDH) but logistically (Pavlohrad)). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• IO Synchronization: RF milbloggers (Colonelcassad) are actively amplifying the narrative of Kramatorsk isolation ("turned to the dark side") just hours before the expected massed fires, attempting to create a psychological sense of inevitable operational collapse.

2.2 Logistics and Sustainment Status

The kinetic focus on commercial maritime traffic (Turkish vessel strike) and internal logistics hubs (Pavlohrad) demonstrates RF's aggressive pivot toward economic and logistical coercion as the primary means of long-term attrition.

2.3 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high synchronization between strategic IO (ICC retaliation, asset freeze minimization) and immediate operational execution (GRAU countdown, deep strikes on Pavlohrad/Odesa). However, internal RF milblogger critique regarding Kupyansk reporting suggests significant C2/CIMIC friction on tactical BDA reporting accuracy. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are in a high state of readiness. The Kupyansk stabilization is a strategic benefit, confirming the viability of the northern flank and allowing for critical resource allocation decisions for the imminent Kramatorsk defense.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Tactical): Successful annihilation of an RF assault group by coordinated effort of 110th, 92nd, and 105th Brigades validates the effectiveness of combined arms defense. (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Potential Strategic Uplift: Reports that the OTRK "Sapsan" (Grom-2) has entered serial production in 2025 (19:09Z) suggest a significant, if long-term, improvement in UAF deep strike and strategic deterrence capability. (JUDGMENT: Requires immediate verification.) (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Cognitive Setback: The message of extreme urgency from high-profile figures ("Change or die") reflects internal anxiety and suggests a need for clear, stabilizing communication from the General Staff (J7/J8).

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

The P1 requirement is immediately shifting 100% to counter-battery collection and fire missions. Long-range assets must be pre-positioned and ready for execution NLT 130000Z DEC.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Legal Counter-Strike: RF declared retaliatory legal action against ICC judges, framing international legal structures as illegitimate.
• EU Asset Freeze Nuance: TASS and pro-RF channels are now highlighting the conditionality of the EU asset freeze (TASS: assets banned from confiscation "while risk of economic deterioration in EU remains"). This attempts to portray the EU decision as temporary or politically fragile, diminishing UAF morale gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Escalation Pretext: The "Dirty Bomb" narrative remains a critical IO background, likely reserved to justify an MDCOA action if the Donbas offensive stalls.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is characterized by high tension and severe urgency leading into the predicted Donbas attack. The confirmation of the EU asset freeze and tactical successes (Kupyansk, 110th BDA) offers counter-balancing positive news, but the severity of the threat (GRAU) and deep strikes (Pavlohrad) is dominating the operational outlook.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• EU Asset Freeze: Confirmed long-term freeze, but subsequent confiscation is subject to future EU decisions and potential legal costs (Belgium requirement for assistance). This requires UAF diplomats to actively secure commitments for the follow-on confiscation phase.
• Turkish Response: Turkey has reacted to the vessel strike. The nature of this reaction (diplomatic condemnation, security adjustments, or withdrawal from maritime security frameworks) is a critical P2 requirement that will determine the viability of Black Sea commerce and logistics.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (P-AN)

TIME HORIZON: Next 12-24 Hours (NLT 131930Z DEC 25)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

Synchronized Kinetic Assault and Deep Logistical Suppression (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Massed Fires Initiation: RF Command initiates the preparatory fire using the 260th GRAU munitions NLT 130000Z DEC, targeting UAF fortified positions and C2 nodes around Kramatorsk and Konstantinovka.
2. Mechanized Thrust: Following the initial barrage, RF Vostok Group executes the exploitation maneuver from Pokrovsk towards Kramatorsk, aiming to bypass hardened static defenses.
3. Deep Strike Sustainment: Shahed and KAB activity continues, focusing heavily on paralyzing the Pavlohrad rail and road nexus to prevent the timely arrival of UAF reinforcements or Western materiel into the Donbas theatre.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

Operational Breach Leading to Rapid Encirclement (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE):

1. Artillery Shock: The 260th GRAU fires achieve unexpectedly high rates of attrition, suppressing UAF counter-battery fires and disorienting forward defensive units (110th/92nd).
2. Exploitation Speed: Mechanized units achieve a critical penetration of the UAF defensive line west of Konstantinovka (T0514/T0504), enabling a rapid advance to the T0513 axis and threatening the complete operational isolation of Kramatorsk within 24 hours.
3. Turkish Withdrawal: Due to the Odesa strike, Turkey pulls out of maritime security guarantees, forcing UAF to divert significant air defense assets to Black Sea protection, degrading defenses in the East.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CCIR)

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS (ACTION-REC)

1. PRIORITY TARGETING (J2/J3): MAXIMUM COUNTER-BATTERY STRIKE WINDOW.

   • Action: All long-range precision fires (HIMARS, SCALP, etc.) must be placed on 30-minute standby to engage identified P1 GRAU firing positions immediately upon acquisition. Focus on destroying RF fire control vehicles and command shelters to degrade the efficiency of the massed barrage, prioritizing targets scheduled to fire NLT 130000Z DEC.

2. AIR DEFENSE & LOGISTICS PROTECTION (OC EAST/SOUTH): DEFEND PAVLOHRAD.

   • Action: Immediately task two (2) mobile short-range air defense platoons (e.g., Gepard, Avenger, or dedicated MANPADS teams) to provide point defense for the Pavlohrad rail hub and identified critical logistics staging areas in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. The success of the Donbas defense hinges on maintaining the flow through this node.

3. MANEUVER & PERSONNEL (OC EAST): FORWARD ATTRITION ZONE.

   • Action: Leverage the confirmed tactical success of the 110th/92nd/105th joint operation. Utilize these units to create high-attrition "kill zones" optimized for close defense and immediate counter-attacks along the main RF exploitation axes (Pokrovsk-Konstantinovka corridor). This is necessary to slow the mechanized advance following the expected artillery saturation.

4. STRATCOM & DIPLOMACY (J7/MFA): HARDEN EU FREEZE AND ENGAGE ANKARA.

   • Action A (EU): Initiate diplomatic efforts to secure explicit EU commitments regarding the shared coverage of legal costs required by Belgium to facilitate future confiscation or utilization of frozen assets, stabilizing the long-term financial security decision.
   • Action B (Turkey): Engage Turkish counterparts at the highest levels to ensure their response to the vessel strike hardens, rather than softens, their stance on Black Sea security and Russian aggression, immediately ahead of the Rammstein Summit.