Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 120600Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: OPERATIONAL WINDOW CLOSING: SKDA KINETIC SURGE IMMINENT; AD STRESS EXPANDS TO ODESA; UAF DEEP STRIKE SUSTAINED.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational center of gravity remains the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Agglomeration (SKDA), now facing confirmed exploitation routes following the seizure of Siversk (North) and ongoing urban combat in Konstantinovka (South). RF forces are using the 12 DEC period to synchronize the forward deployment of artillery mass (260th GRAU) with strategic strikes against logistics/energy infrastructure. The attack on Odesa confirms the expansion of the RF deep strike target list beyond the Pavlohrad/Sumy/Kharkiv rail and energy hubs.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change. Low-visibility fog continues to favor low-altitude penetration by RF reconnaissance and strike assets, facilitating the confirmed nocturnal strikes on Odesa and the previously identified multi-vector UAS attacks in the North/East.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

Ukrainian Air Defense (AD) assets are operating under maximum stress, now required to cover four critical sectors simultaneously: Pavlohrad (Tier 1 Logistic Hub), Sumy/Kharkiv (Northern Front Supply Lines), and Odesa (Southern Logistics/Energy Infrastructure). The sustained UAF deep-strike campaign into RF territory (confirmed interception of 90 UAVs) compels RF to divert significant AD assets, marginally reducing AD coverage over forward assault areas.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent remains focused on achieving decisive operational success in the SKDA sector by NLT 130000Z DEC, enabled by concentrated, high-volume preparatory fire. The strike on Odesa, causing infrastructure disruption, is designed to further fragment UAF AD resources and pressure high command regarding resource allocation away from the main kinetic effort in Donbas.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The previously noted deployment of Mangas heavy lift logistics drones remains the most critical tactical adaptation. The expansion of high-yield kinetic targets (Odesa) confirms RF operational adaptation to strike critical nodes far from the current SKDA main effort.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

CRITICAL LOGISTICS GAP: The 260th GRAU cargo has departed its depot and is in transit. Its location (Ilovaisk/Volnovakha) and dispersal status remain the primary unknown. RF sustainment capability is robust, enhanced by heavy-lift drones and aggressive AD suppression efforts.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective, demonstrated by the simultaneous coordination of:

1. Preparation for the SKDA offensive.
2. Execution of complex, high-risk deep kinetic strikes (Odesa).
3. Defensive response to the sustained UAF deep strike campaign (Bryansk/other regions).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains elevated, but AD resources are critically strained. The UAF is maintaining strategic initiative by sustaining high-volume deep strikes into Russian territory (estimated 90 UAVs deployed), forcing RF AD reallocation. Morale is stable, supported by official dissemination of high enemy loss estimates (1400 personnel, 1 aircraft reported lost).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Battle): Sustained, high-volume kinetic pressure on RF deep rear areas and military facilities (Bryansk, etc.), confirmed by high RF interception claims (90 UAVs).
• Setback (Infrastructure Defense): Confirmed partial loss of power and water in Odesa due to RF kinetic strike, further complicating force rotation and civilian support in the South.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

P1 Requirement: Immediate, flexible reallocation of mobile, short-range AD systems (Gepard/Shilka/Vulkan) to the Odesa sector to mitigate infrastructure damage, while maintaining maximum coverage over Pavlohrad and the SKDA rear area. P2 Constraint: The need to commit increasing numbers of AD assets for static defense reduces the ability to reposition air defenses to support tactical maneuver in the SKDA close fight.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF information campaigns are operating on dual tracks:

1. Domestic Projection: Celebrating national holidays (Constitution Day) and exaggerating defensive successes (90 UAV intercepts) to shield the population from the reality of UAF deep strikes.
2. Military Cohesion: Milbloggers (Fighterbomber) project confidence and operational success to maintain military esprit de corps ahead of the critical 13 DEC offensive.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is stable, bolstered by consistent messaging regarding high RF losses. However, sustained attacks on major civilian centers (Odesa) risk local morale degradation and create internal political pressure if essential services are not rapidly restored.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The Turkish Foreign Minister's statement regarding "difficult choices" remains the critical operational hazard in the diplomatic sphere. No immediate counter-signaling from NATO partners has been confirmed, indicating a potential vacuum being exploited by RF IO to promote the "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. SKDA Artillery Saturation: RF will execute the planned preparatory fire utilizing the newly arrived 260th GRAU cargo mass across the Siversk-Konstantinovka axis NLT 130000Z DEC. This fire will be followed by heavy mechanized assaults aimed at linking the northern and southern breakthrough points.
2. Infrastructure Vicious Cycle: RF will maintain high-rate, multi-vector UAS/Kinetic strikes targeting logistics and energy infrastructure (Pavlohrad, Odesa, Sumy, Kharkiv) to pin down UAF AD assets and prevent reserve deployment to the SKDA front.
3. IO Escalation: RF will increase diplomatic signaling via state media and proxy diplomats, exploiting the Turkish FM statement to push the concept of conditional Western aid tied to immediate cease-fire negotiations based on current front lines.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Logistics Collapse Fusion (MDCOA 1): A simultaneous, catastrophic RF kinetic strike on the Pavlohrad rail hub and a key energy transfer station in Odesa results in widespread logistical paralysis and an inability to rotate forces or move ammunition to the SKDA. This coincides with a major NATO power publicly conditioning aid on territorial concessions (validating RF IO).
2. Flank Encirclement (MDCOA 2): Successful RF breach exploitation south of Siversk links with elements advancing north from Konstantinovka, achieving the operational isolation of Kramatorsk NLT 140000Z DEC, forcing a disordered UAF withdrawal from the entire SKDA.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS