Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 120600Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: SKDA FIRE IMMINENT; RF HYBRID CAMPAIGN ESCALATES VIA LEGAL/IO NARRATIVE; UAV THREAT TO DNIPROPETROVSK LOGISTICS CONFIRMED.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Agglomeration (SKDA) remains the primary operational focus, facing an imminent high-volume artillery preparation NLT 130000Z DEC. The critical axis runs from the RF-held Siversk (North) and the contested urban area of Konstantinovka (South).

NEW KINETIC THREAT: UAF Air Force confirms a hostile UAV track in Eastern Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, vectoring toward Pavlohrad. Pavlohrad is a critical rail, logistics, and military-industrial hub supporting the Donbas front. This indicates RF intent to interdict deep UAF sustainment lines simultaneous with the preparatory fire.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Low visibility (fog/haze) in the early morning favors UAV reconnaissance and strike operations (both RF and UAF). Ground conditions remain conducive for heavy mechanized movement on hardened routes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces in the SKDA are maintaining high alert status (DEFCON 2) for counter-battery fire (CBF) and force protection against thermobaric threats (TOS-2). RF forces are fully committed to pre-positioning the recently dispersed 260th GRAU cargo for maximum saturation effect. Air Defense (AD) assets in Dnipropetrovsk must be immediately prioritized to intercept the incoming UAV.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is shifting toward a layered approach: operational collapse of the SKDA via kinetic means, coupled with systematic international delegitimization of the Kyiv government via information and legalistic campaigns.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed UAV targeting of Pavlohrad-area infrastructure marks a tactical adaptation to hit critical choke points outside the immediate deep battle zone (Moscow/Caspian). This requires UAF AD to redeploy and thin protective coverage, increasing risk to other strategic assets.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The precise location of the 260th GRAU cargo remains the critical intelligence gap. It is estimated to be within T+6 to T+18 hours of forward operational distribution, maximizing risk for UAF front-line assets.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 shows effective multi-domain integration, coordinating the timeline for the kinetic barrage with the global launch of the IO/Legal campaign (Lavrov statement).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are postured defensively against ground penetration and fire saturation. AD systems are tracking the Pavlohrad-bound UAV. Readiness is high, but the strain of managing the internal cohesion risk posed by the SZCh-reassigned personnel remains a major concern under intense fire.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Strategic IO): The dual narrative of diplomatic abandonment (Nuclear Talks) and internal criminality (Lavrov/Tribunal) severely compresses the cognitive space available for UAF Strategic Communication.
• Setback (Pessimism): RF use of former PM Azarov to project hopelessness about a pre-Christmas settlement is specifically designed to erode Western and internal public will.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The simultaneous kinetic and IO threats place immense pressure on:

1. Air Defense: Requirement to protect both fixed strategic targets (Caspian/Moscow response) and critical logistics nodes (Pavlohrad).
2. Strategic Communications (StratCom): Urgent need for a unified counter-narrative against the nuclear talks, the Tribunal narrative, and the general projection of fatigue/hopelessness.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

ESCALATION OF LEGAL-INFO WARFARE (HIGH Confidence): Foreign Minister Lavrov’s official endorsement of the "International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neonazis" confirms the operationalization of a long-planned RF legalistic IO campaign. This strategy aims to:

1. Create external pressure for a "Truth Commission" or similar mechanism, thereby forcing Ukraine into a negotiating posture based on RF pre-conditions.
2. Provide domestic and global justification for current and future military action.
3. Utilize proxies (Azarov) to enforce the message that military resistance is futile.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal morale is at a critical decision point. While UAF deep strike successes boost confidence, the combined risk of SKDA collapse and perceived Western diplomatic retreat could severely damage long-term commitment. The perceived effectiveness of AD/CBF will be key to maintaining tactical morale over the next 48 hours.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The convergence of the US/RF/China nuclear narrative and the RF legalistic campaign (Tribunal) creates maximum diplomatic risk. Western capitals are receiving dual signals from Moscow: (1) We are responsible global nuclear stabilizers, and (2) Ukraine is a criminal state requiring decisive action. This framing actively discourages robust military aid.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. SKDA Fire Execution: High-volume preparatory fire and TOS-2 saturation across the Konstantinovka-Siversk axis beginning NLT 130000Z DEC.
2. Logistics Interdiction: Confirmed UAV strike on key UAF logistics nodes in the Dnipropetrovsk region (likely Pavlohrad rail or storage facilities) in conjunction with the fire mission.
3. IO/Legal Pressure: RF accelerates diplomatic efforts (leveraging nuclear talks) while simultaneously launching legal proceedings/reports (Tribunal) to isolate Ukraine and demand a conditional cease-fire (DMZ Sovereignty).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Operational Breach and Reserve Attrition: The concentrated GRAU fire successfully suppresses UAF CBF capability, allowing RF armored assets to achieve a tactical breach near Konstantinovka. The resultant collapse forces the premature, uncoordinated deployment of UAF reserves (including SZCh-reassigned units), leading to mass casualties and the isolation of Kramatorsk.
2. Strategic Aid Conditionality: Western leaders announce new strategic assistance packages (e.g., SAFE II) but attach public conditions tied to participation in RF-led "security dialogues" or "humanitarian investigations" (Tribunal), effectively limiting Ukraine’s freedom of action and normalizing RF diplomatic leverage.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS