Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 122200Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: SKDA PREPARATORY FIRE IMMINENT; STRATEGIC IO THREAT AMPLIFIED BY CONFIRMED DENUCLEARIZATION NARRATIVE; UAF DEEP STRIKE CAPABILITY PERSISTS.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational gravity remains focused on the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Agglomeration (SKDA). RF forces maintain positions secured by the validated seizure of Siversk and continued urban penetration into Konstantinovka (RF claims 45% control). The immediate kinetic threat is the planned execution of high-volume preparatory fire intended to precede armored breakthroughs along the Siversk-Konstantinovka axis.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant environmental changes since 121800Z DEC. Low visibility conditions continue to favor RF reconnaissance UAS, while ground conditions support heavy mechanized maneuver along hardened routes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces in the SKDA are prepared for defensive counter-fire and deep interdiction missions. RF forces are posturing for the predicted fire saturation (NLT 130000Z DEC), evidenced by confirmed utilization of specialized high-impact ordnance (TOS-2) near the Krasnoarmiyske direction. Deep battle dynamics are confirmed ongoing following successful UAF UAV strikes targeting Moscow infrastructure.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is the operational collapse of the SKDA via overwhelming fire superiority, coordinated with a strategic diplomatic-information campaign aimed at isolating Ukraine.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed engagement of UAF UAVs targeting Moscow indicates that RF must continue allocating advanced AD and EW assets to domestic protection, potentially reducing their availability for deployment near the contact line. This diversion is a marginal gain for UAF operational freedom.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Logistical flow for the preparatory barrage remains the key factor. The 260th GRAU cargo is confirmed mobile and expected to reach forward depots imminently, maximizing RF capacity for the kinetic phase.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, demonstrating effective integration between high-impact battlefield assets (TOS-2 deployment) and the execution of high-level strategic information operations (Nuclear Narrative amplification).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF units are in heightened readiness for the expected artillery saturation. The policy of reassigning Unauthorized Absence (SZCh) personnel directly to Assault Units remains a critical internal cohesion risk, requiring strict C2 oversight.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Battle): Confirmed successful kinetic penetration of RF air defense layers resulting in UAV strikes against Moscow (120244Z DEC). This signals persistent long-range engagement capability.
• Setback (Strategic IO): The confirmation and amplification of the nuclear disarmament narrative by US and RF sources (TASS) severely escalates the diplomatic threat environment, potentially fracturing Western political support.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate focus remains on securing resources for:

1. Counter-Battery Fire (CBF): Critical for neutralizing the incoming GRAU munitions.
2. Engineering/Fortification: Essential to mitigate the confirmed TOS-2 thermobaric threat.
3. Strategic Communication Assets: Urgent requirement for a high-level, coordinated diplomatic counter-narrative against the nuclear narrative.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (CRITICAL AMPLIFICATION)

The RF strategic information campaign regarding US/RF/China denuclearization talks has been confirmed and amplified by TASS.

• Objective: To force Western diplomatic focus away from aid packages and military support for Ukraine toward broader, seemingly more pressing nuclear security matters, thereby normalizing diplomatic engagement with Moscow.
• New Factor (Diversion): The US focus on intercepting Venezuelan maritime transport (РБК-Україна 120243Z DEC) introduces a new, high-profile foreign policy concern for Washington, potentially diverting senior decision-maker attention and resources away from the Eastern European theater at a critical juncture.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal UAF morale faces a dual risk: the immediate, severe kinetic threat (SKDA fire preparation) compounded by the perception of high-level diplomatic abandonment or deprioritization in Western capitals due to the nuclear narrative.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (IMMEDIATE THREAT)

The confirmed public statements on denuclearization talks represent an immediate, high-priority threat to the stability of Ukraine aid packages. The international community may be incentivized to pressure Ukraine toward concessions to "stabilize" the broader US-RF security dialogue.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. SKDA Fire Saturation (NLT 130000Z DEC): Execution of predicted high-volume artillery barrage across the SKDA, with thermobaric systems (TOS-2) targeting hard points near Krasnoarmiyske.
2. Immediate IO Exploitation: RF maximizes diplomatic leverage from the nuclear narrative to push for a conditional cease-fire (e.g., recognition of 'DMZ Sovereignty') before key Western aid funding decisions are finalized.
3. Sustained Deep Strikes: RF continues long-range strikes (likely missile/UAV) against high-value UAF C2, logistics, or energy infrastructure in retaliation for confirmed UAF strikes on Moscow and the Caspian Sea.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Operational Breach and Encirclement: The overwhelming preparatory fire successfully achieves a breach in the Konstantinovka line. This forces UAF operational reserves (including the SZCh-reassigned units) into a poorly coordinated counter-attack, leading to high attrition, potential C2 collapse, and the isolation of Kramatorsk.
2. Western Aid Freeze: Key NATO partners publicly or privately signal intent to halt or severely condition upcoming military aid (SAFE II funding) pending the outcome of US-RF nuclear stability discussions, leading to immediate tactical capability gaps (CBF/AD).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS