Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 120600Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: SKDA PINCER INTENSIFICATION; GRAU LOGISTICS UNLOCATED (P1 GAP); CRITICAL ESCALATION OF RF/OSINT POLITICAL INTERFERENCE.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational crisis around the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Agglomeration (SKDA) remains the focus of combat. The tactical situation is defined by the RF dual-axis threat:

• Northern Axis: Exploitation continues following the confirmed loss of Siversk. UAF forces are establishing secondary defensive positions northwest of Slovyansk.
• Southern Axis (Konstantinovka): Urban combat is high-intensity, with RF claims of 45% control requiring urgent verification (P2 Gap). Hold of Highway T0515 is increasingly tenuous.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Nighttime, low visibility conditions persist. These conditions continue to favor RF UAS/FPV operations and mechanized movement in the SKDA sector, complicating UAF counter-mobility and reconnaissance efforts.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are postured in a high-intensity defense across the SKDA perimeter.

DEEP BATTLE UPDATE (FACTS):

• UAF attempted deep strike against the Moscow region via UAV. Interception confirmed by RF Air Defense assets. (Source: Moscow Mayor Sobyanin, TASS, ASTRA).
• Multiple explosions confirmed in Odesa (Source: Suspilne, RBK-Ukraine). This confirms continued RF use of deep strike capabilities (Missile/UAS) targeting rear infrastructure and defensive assets.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent remains focused on achieving kinetic and cognitive victory simultaneously: operational collapse of SKDA and undermining international support via information warfare (IO).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the increased utilization of strategic IO/OSINT channels to directly interfere with UAF political stability and international relations, running parallel to the SKDA kinetic operation. Claims regarding the mass dissolution of foreign mercenary contracts are a coordinated PSYOP designed to amplify manpower fears (TASS, 120007Z DEC).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL GAP)

JUDGMENT: The status of the 260th GRAU cargo remains unknown (P1 Gap), making accurate kinetic predictions difficult, but not mitigating the threat. The window for striking the depot is closed; the priority for LRPF targeting remains the rail choke points (Ilovaisk/Volnovakha). Failure to locate and strike this cargo within the next 6 hours is assessed as guaranteeing RF fire superiority NLT 130000Z DEC.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 demonstrates high strategic effectiveness in coordinating deep strikes (Odesa) and air defense (Moscow) while maintaining the pressure on the SKDA front. The rapid integration and synchronization of IO regarding the Trump statements show sophisticated, centrally directed C2 messaging.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains high, driven by the critical threat to Kramatorsk. The high-risk policy of utilizing SZCh personnel in assault units continues, which demands immediate Command/Information leadership to mitigate disciplinary and morale risks.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Continued ability to project power deep into RF territory (Moscow attempt; Caspian Sea strike, previous report).
• Setbacks: Confirmed RF interception of Moscow-bound UAV demonstrates the operational cost and diminishing probability of success for deep strikes against high-value RF assets protected by dense AD. Confirmed strikes on Odesa highlight vulnerabilities in southern defensive infrastructure.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The simultaneous requirement to maintain deep strike pressure, execute holding actions in Konstantinovka, and urgently fortify the northern flank (Siversk breach) is straining LRPF and specialized engineering resources. LRPF allocation must focus almost exclusively on the GRAU interdiction mission (Hunt Plan Alpha).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (CRITICAL UPDATE)

The RF IO strategy has escalated from general demoralization to targeted, high-level political disruption.

1. Exploitation of US Political Commentary: RF sources are actively manipulating statements by D. Trump. While Trump reportedly offered security guarantees, RF messaging strips this context, focusing entirely on the claim that "everyone except Zelenskyy liked the peace plan." (Source: TASS, WarCor).
   • JUDGMENT: This is a direct attempt to undermine President Zelenskyy’s perceived political authority ahead of the SAFE II commitments and cast him as an intransigent war proponent. (Confidence: HIGH)
2. Foreign Fighter PSYOP: The claim of "mass cancellation of contracts" by foreign mercenaries (TASS) is designed to signal the collapse of international commitment to the conflict and sow internal discord within UAF ranks facing manpower constraints.
3. Local Validation: RF channels continue to post combat propaganda featuring specialized units (e.g., "Anvar detachment") to boost internal morale and validate localized gains.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal morale faces immediate risk from two vectors: the kinetic threat to SKDA, and the political/disciplinary uncertainty created by the SZCh policy, exacerbated by RF claims of foreign fighter attrition and high-level political division.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF campaign to exploit the Trump comments threatens to destabilize partner confidence critical to the long-term €150 billion SAFE II commitment. Maintaining a united political front and rapidly countering the "Zelenskyy rejects peace" narrative is as critical as holding Konstantinovka.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Immediate IO Campaign Focus (T+0 to T+12 HRS): RF will flood key Western and internal OSINT/SOCINT channels with the narrative that UAF leadership is obstructing peace, citing the exploited Trump comments and the "DMZ Sovereignty" demand, timed to pressure EU/US commitment decision points.
2. Artillery Preparatory Fire (T+12 to T+36 HRS): Assuming partial or complete delivery of the 260th GRAU cargo, RF will initiate overwhelming artillery fire superiority to support mechanized clearing operations in Konstantinovka and probes toward Slovyansk, achieving the operational link-up NLT 130000Z DEC.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Operational SKDA Collapse and Isolation: Failure to interdict the GRAU cargo leads to rapid erosion of UAF defense in Konstantinovka. A disorderly retrograde from Kramatorsk and Slovyansk is forced, enabling RF forces to establish a stable, deep defensive line controlling critical infrastructure, creating the single largest tactical loss of the year.
2. Political-Strategic Erosion: The SKDA collapse, coupled with the success of the "DMZ Sovereignty" and "Zelenskyy obstacle" IO narratives, creates sufficient doubt among key Western partners to trigger conditional suspension of SAFE II funding, jeopardizing long-term defense planning.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS