Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 112330Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: GRAU LOGISTICS INTERDICTION WINDOW EXPIRED; CONFIRMED HIGH-INTENSITY CONFLICT IN POKROVSK SECTOR; PERSISTENT MULTI-AXIS UAS THREAT.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The focus of kinetic activity has intensified across the southern flank of the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Agglomeration (SKDA). The General Staff reports 165 kinetic engagements in the last 24 hours, identifying the Pokrovsk direction (Konstantinovka/Dimitrov axis) as the current operational epicenter. The RF pincer remains active, leveraging the Siversk breach (North) and the Pokrovsk pressure (South).

• Key Terrain: The dense urban environment of Konstantinovka and the associated control of Highway T0515 remain critical. Loss of Konstantinovka will enable RF to utilize the main supply routes to isolate Kramatorsk rapidly.
• Deep Battle: UAF deep strike attempts continue (confirmed reporting of strikes targeting Krasnodar Krai). RF maintains pervasive deep reconnaissance and attack capabilities (UAS alerts in Sumy, Mykolaiv, Odesa).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Nighttime conditions and low visibility persist across the operational area.

• Tactical Impact (Judgment/HIGH Confidence): This continues to favor covert RF mechanized movements and highly successful, high-tempo UAS/FPV operations. The multi-axis drone threat (Black Sea/Odesa, Sumy/Poltava) is effectively exploiting low-visibility conditions to degrade UAF deep defense and air space management.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF resources are critically stretched by the dual-front requirement: stabilizing the SKDA frontline and mitigating highly dispersed RF deep threats.

• Air Defense (FACT): Confirmed, simultaneous RF hostile UAS activity across three separate axes:
  1. Northern Sector: Sumy Oblast (on vector toward Poltava/Kharkiv, 23:09Z).
  2. Southern Sector: Mykolaiv/Black Sea (on vector toward Odesa Oblast, 22:44Z, 23:08Z).
  3. Donbas: High density of FPV operations in the Pokrovsk sector (implied by 165 engagements and RF training data).
• Control Measures: Resources allocated for the Long-Range Precision Fire (LRPF) strike against the 260th GRAU package are now past the critical decision point of 120200Z DEC. Immediate prioritization must shift to GRAU BDA and frontline defense.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability (Sustained Technological Warfare): RF is prioritizing the long-term sustainment of drone superiority. The focus on FPV training for youth cadets ("VOIN" Center finals, 23:11Z) confirms a strategic, institutionalized effort to maintain a large, technologically proficient drone operator pool. Intention (Operational): Exploit the Pokrovsk (Konstantinovka) axis (confirmed "hottest direction") immediately following the anticipated arrival of the 260th GRAU munitions. Intention (Strategic): Integrate youth military training with current combat narratives (e.g., FPV use) to ensure a continuous supply of technically trained personnel and bolster domestic morale regarding long-term conflict endurance.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (JUDGMENT/MEDIUM Confidence)

The observed shift in intensity to the Pokrovsk axis (General Staff report) indicates a temporary prioritization of the southern pincer element.

• Adaptation: RF forces are likely attempting to secure Konstantinovka before the newly exposed northern flank (Siversk) can be fully stabilized by UAF reserves. This minimizes the risk of simultaneous large-scale breaches but maximizes pressure on the UAF's most strained sector.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL JUDGMENT/HIGH Confidence)

The operational window for high-confidence interdiction of the 260th GRAU munitions surge at Volnovakha/Ilovaisk expired at 120200Z DEC.

• Assessment: Unless confirmation of a successful strike is received immediately, the GRAU consignment must be assumed to be reaching forward distribution depots. This directly enables MDCOA 1 (Operational Collapse) due to overwhelming fire superiority.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, coordinating multi-domain operations: strategic logistics delivery (GRAU), dispersed deep kinetic strikes (UAS/UAVs), and IO efforts targeting long-term capability building.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness is high, but resources are highly compressed. The UAF is maintaining a high operational tempo (165 battles). The ability to conduct deep counter-strikes (Krasnodar report) demonstrates continued projection capability, but this must not overshadow the immediate SKDA crisis.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The successful execution of C2 disruption near Siversk (previous report) has likely bought time, allowing the RF to shift focus to the Pokrovsk sector. This temporary advantage must now be utilized for reinforcing the southern flank.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Priority 1 Requirement: Immediate Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) on the GRAU logistics target. Without BDA, forward fire planning is impossible.
• Constraint: Mobile EW/SHORAD assets are critically constrained by the persistent, geographically dispersed RF UAS threat (Sumy, Odesa, Donbas). The current distribution model is likely sub-optimal for mitigating the simultaneous threats.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (JUDGMENT/MEDIUM Confidence)

The RF IO strategy has broadened its focus from immediate retreat narratives to long-term capability signaling.

• Signaling: The public display of FPV drone training for youth (VOIN Center) aims to convey endurance, technological superiority, and the deep integration of the conflict into Russian society, counteracting any perception of resource exhaustion.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal morale faces twin threats: high casualty rates (implied by 165 battles) and the risk of catastrophic loss in the SKDA. A clear, successful military action is needed to stabilize sentiment.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The confirmation of the EC preparing a second, massive €150 billion EU military investment program (SAFE II) is strategically critical. UAF must demonstrate the operational stability required for international partners to confidently commit to such a long-term, large-scale investment. Operational failure at SKDA risks jeopardizing this future support.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Targeted Pokrovsk Breach (T+6 to T+12 HRS): Assuming GRAU delivery was successful, RF artillery saturation will commence NLT 120800Z DEC, focusing fire concentration on the Pokrovsk/Konstantinovka axis. This preparatory fire will enable a large-scale mechanized assault to penetrate UAF urban defenses and secure operational control of Konstantinovka.
2. Persistent Rear Area Degradation: RF UAS/UAV activity will continue across Northern and Southern Ukraine (Sumy, Odesa) to suppress UAF logistics resupply paths and divert critical SHORAD assets away from the Donbas.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. SKDA Collapse via Southern Pincer: RF secures Konstantinovka, forcing an unplanned, rapid UAF retrograde movement from Kramatorsk. The overwhelming fire superiority enabled by the un-interdicted GRAU consignment makes the defense untenable, leading to the collapse of the entire SKDA defense line within 72 hours.
2. Strategic Isolation: RF IO and kinetic pressure succeed in convincing international partners (ahead of SAFE II funding discussions) that UAF defenses are unsustainable, leading to aid hesitation or conditions being placed on future military support.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS