Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 112200Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: IMMEDIATE CRITICAL UPDATE: CONFIRMED RF DEEP STRIKE ON PAVLOHRAD; LOGISTICS INTERDICTION WINDOW NEARING ZERO HOUR (T-MINUS 04:00); INCREASED RISK TO UAF REAR AREA INFRASTRUCTURE.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

The strategic threat remains the dual-axis pressure on the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk defensive hub. RF forces have consolidated the Siversk seizure and continue kinetic exploitation toward Lysivka on the P-79 highway.

• Slovyansk Northern Axis: RF propaganda confirming Siversk seizure by a ground commander validates the operational commitment to exploiting this breach. Expect immediate and sustained pressure on Lysivka in the coming hours.
• Deep Rear Area (CRITICAL NEW FACT): Confirmed enemy Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) strikes resulting in explosions in Pavlohrad, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This validates the previous assessment that RF is actively targeting rear logistics and C2 hubs. Further UAS detection confirms a secondary vector toward Synelnykove, indicating a sustained campaign to suppress UAF air defense and disrupt operational rear staging.
• Crimean Deep Strike (FACT): UAF deep strike capability confirmed successful interdiction of an RF An-26 military transport aircraft at Kacha Airfield, Crimea, indicating continued operational reach and effective enemy target prosecution.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change. Conditions allow sustained UAS and mechanized maneuver.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF resources are acutely divided between immediate kinetic defense (Lysivka/Konstantinovka) and urgent force protection requirements for critical rear infrastructure (Pavlohrad/Synelnykove). This diversion of SHORAD/C-UAS assets inherently weakens frontline air cover.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (JUDGEMENT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Capability (Multi-Domain): RF has demonstrated the capability to coordinate simultaneous deep UAS strikes in the rear (Dnipropetrovsk) while maintaining high-intensity mechanized pressure at the decisive point (Slovyansk axis). Intention (Operational): The primary intent remains to isolate and capture the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration. Secondary, confirmed intent is to achieve logistics interdiction parity by destroying UAF rear hubs (Pavlohrad/Synelnykove) in reaction to UAF deep strikes (Crimea/Caspian). Intention (IO/Strategic): To utilize kinetic success (Siversk) to bolster aggressive strategic rhetoric ("DMZ Sovereignty") and normalize Russian international standing (IOC recommendation).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (JUDGEMENT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

RF operational targeting has demonstrably shifted from generalized deep strikes to highly specific attacks on known logistical/transport hubs (e.g., Pavlohrad, a key rail junction and industrial center). This suggests improved targeting intelligence or a tactical decision to risk high-value UAS assets for confirmed infrastructure disruption.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL UNCHANGED)

The deadline for interdicting the 260th GRAU munitions surge is T-MINUS 04:00 HRS (NLT 120200Z DEC). The cargo remains mobile and untargeted, confirming RF's window of vulnerability is rapidly expiring. Failure to strike this convoy before dispersion will guarantee RF fire superiority within the Slovyansk sector NLT 121000Z DEC.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

Effective, demonstrating high-level strategic coordination (Caspian/Crimea/Pavlohrad targeting) and solid tactical C2 at the frontline (confirmed Siversk consolidation).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Kinetic capability remains high in the deep battle (Crimea strike). Defensive posture is heavily stressed by the immediate requirement to divert assets to defend the rear (Pavlohrad).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Success: Confirmed strike on RF An-26 at Kacha Airfield, degrading RF military airlift capacity in the Southern direction. Setback (Organizational/Cohesion): Reports of organizational conflict involving the structure and leadership of the 2nd International Legion ZSU. This creates a significant risk to foreign fighter retention, unit cohesion, and international perception of management capability.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Time: Interdiction window for the GRAU convoy is critically short.
2. Air Defense Allocation: Urgent requirement to reposition C-UAS and SHORAD systems to address the confirmed active threats in Pavlohrad and Synelnykove, balancing rear security against frontline risk.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• RF External Normalization: The International Olympic Committee (IOC) recommendation to allow Russian junior athletes to compete under national symbols is a significant propaganda victory for Moscow, promoting a narrative of international normalization despite ongoing aggression.
• Western Alliance Friction: The highly public statement by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warning Donald Trump to avoid interfering in European democracy (Political interference/Der Spiegel narrative) signals existing high friction within the Western coalition, which RF IO will immediately exploit to sow division and undermine unified support for Kyiv.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF StratCom must urgently address the organizational friction within the 2nd International Legion to prevent negative domestic and international morale consequences. UAF deep strikes (Crimea) should be maximized for internal morale boost.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The convergence of the Siversk breakthrough, aggressive "DMZ Sovereignty" rhetoric, and internal Western political friction creates the most vulnerable diplomatic environment yet, particularly ahead of the Dec 13 meeting.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Northern Penetration and Artillery Preparation (T+0 to T+8 HRS): RF forces will execute a heavy, rapid push to seize Lysivka, utilizing concentrated forces (e.g., 123rd OMRB) to establish direct fire positions on Slovyansk. This kinetic push will aim to secure ground before the large-scale GRAU munitions delivery enables area saturation.
2. Rear Area Saturation (T+0 to T+12 HRS): RF will maintain high-tempo UAS/loitering munition operations (Confirmed: Pavlohrad, Synelnykove) against logistics nodes, rail lines, and temporary C2 facilities in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast to hinder UAF reserve mobilization and supply flow into the Donbas.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Logistics Collapse & Operational Breakthrough: Failure to execute the deep strike on the 260th GRAU convoy is compounded by successful RF UAS interdiction of UAF rear logistics via the confirmed attacks on Pavlohrad/Synelnykove. This simultaneous kinetic and logistical pressure overwhelms OC East defenses, forcing a disorganized retreat from Konstantinovka and the operational encirclement of Kramatorsk NLT 121800Z DEC.
2. Strategic Isolation: RF maximizes the "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative combined with the internal friction over the 2nd International Legion to generate a media crisis, leading key Western partners to temporarily pause or condition aid pending stabilization.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS