Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 112000Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL UPDATE: IMMINENT LRPF WINDOW EXPIRATION; SLOVYANSK NORTHERN FLANK CONSOLIDATION BY RF 3RD CAA; ESCALATING DIPLOMATIC COERCION.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the RF operational victory at Siversk, which has created a critical exploitation corridor directly threatening the northern approaches to Slovyansk. RF forces are moving to solidify this penetration.

• Siversk Axis (FACT): RF control of Siversk is confirmed and validated by high-level RF C2 (Putin/MoD congratulations). Exploitation is led by elements of the RF 3rd Combined Arms Army (CAA), specifically the 123rd and 6th Separate Guards Motorised Rifle Brigades, advancing toward the secondary UAF defensive line.
• Donbas Hub: The integrity of the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk defensive hub remains the primary objective for both sides. The loss of Siversk shifts the Main Effort (ME) of OC East to establishing immediate hasty defenses west of the city boundary.
• LOC Interdiction (CRITICAL): The interdiction window for the 260th GRAU munitions convoy is closing rapidly. Railheads at Ilovaisk and Volnovakha remain the highest probability static targets before dispersion.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Conditions remain stable and permissive for sustained ground maneuver and high-tempo kinetic operations across the Donbas and Zaporizhzhia sectors. No significant meteorological impact on LRPF targeting or air defense operations is anticipated in the next 12 hours.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF reserves are being deployed and engineering assets are committed to establishing the new Forward Line of Troops (FLOT) west of the Siversk penetration, focusing on counter-mobility and establishing observation posts. RF forces are actively demonstrating high-level command focus (Putin directly contacting front commanders) to ensure rapid exploitation of the Siversk breach.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability: RF maintains institutional and logistical capacity to sustain the current high-tempo offensive, contingent upon successful delivery of the 260th GRAU materiel. High C2 effectiveness is demonstrated by the rapid synchronization of tactical gains (Siversk) with strategic IO validation (MoD/TASS). Intention (Kinetic): Immediate intent is to synchronize the pincer movement—northern exploitation by 3rd CAA elements and urban reduction in Konstantinovka—leading to the operational isolation of Kramatorsk. Intention (Hybrid/IO): Leverage the tactical momentum (Siversk seizure) and perceived Western diplomatic friction (Trump messaging) to force immediate unfavorable territorial concessions via Strategic Coercion (MDCOA).

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The identification of specific 3rd CAA units (123rd/6th BDEs) tasked with mopping-up and exploitation confirms that the RF Center Group of Forces (CGF) is committing established, identified forces to capitalize on the breach. This suggests a structured, rather than hasty, exploitation effort.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL)

The 260th GRAU munitions surge is confirmed mobile. The window for successful deep kinetic interdiction is NLT 120200Z DEC. Failure to strike before this deadline will result in an immediate and unsustainable increase in RF artillery saturation across the entire Donetsk front, enabling the predicted MLCOA.

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 effectiveness is assessed as HIGH. The immediate integration of the Siversk seizure into the national strategic narrative, culminating in direct communication between President Putin and front commanders, signals strong centralized decision-making and rapid validation of operational success. This C2 strength supports high-risk exploitation attempts.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness is highly strained in OC East. Resources must be immediately redirected to fortify the northern Slovyansk approaches following the loss of Siversk. The policy decision regarding the reassignment of SZCh personnel (Unauthorized Absence) to assault units demands immediate, robust NCO oversight and disciplinary controls to mitigate internal morale risks.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The confirmed seizure of Siversk by RF 3rd CAA is the defining tactical setback of the current reporting period, directly enabling the threat to Slovyansk. Counter-UAV operations continue to validate the utility of the P1-SUN interceptor drone, and deep battle capabilities (Caspian strike) demonstrate continued reach, though the immediate priority is survival in the Donbas.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint remains the compressed timeline for LRPF execution against the GRAU convoy. Secondary constraints include the immediate need for engineering and counter-mobility assets to establish a viable secondary defense line against the 3rd CAA exploitation axes.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO channels are highly coordinated, emphasizing the Siversk victory as proof of strategic Ukrainian collapse.

1. C2 Validation: TASS and MoD reports of Putin speaking to commanders serve to legitimize the gains and reinforce the internal narrative of unified, high-level C2.
2. Western Disunity Amplification: RF and aligned channels (Alex Parker Returns, Colonelcassad) are aggressively leveraging statements attributed to US political figures (Trump) expressing frustration and demanding "action, not talks." This is aimed at convincing Kyiv that international support is fracturing and that unfavorable peace terms are inevitable.
3. Huliaipole Claims (JUDGEMENT): RF claims of advances in Huliaipole (Zaporizhzhia) are likely amplified IO intended to fix UAF attention and prevent reinforcement of OC East. (DS beliefs show very low confidence in a major Huliaipole assault.)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is stressed by the operational setbacks but supported by confirmed international financial backing (EU tranche). RF domestic issues (Krasnodar police brutality, Horlivka crime) continue to highlight socio-economic instability, though this remains compartmentalized from military operations.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

CRITICAL FACT: Confirmation of US political messaging (attributable to Trump faction) indicating conditional participation in upcoming peace talks (Dec 13) only if a "chance for a peace agreement" is present. (Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

JUDGEMENT: This messaging dramatically increases the threat of Strategic Coercion (MDCOA), as RF will view this as an expiration date to achieve maximum territorial gains before forced negotiations.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. ARTILLERY ENABLER (T+2 to T+18 HRS): The mobile 260th GRAU materiel will arrive at forward depots/railheads (Volnovakha/Ilovaisk) NLT 120200Z DEC. Subsequent dispersion and commencement of artillery preparation will enable high-volume fire superiority against Konstantinovka and the Slovyansk northern flank NLT 121000Z DEC.
2. CAA EXPLOITATION: RF 3rd CAA elements (123rd/6th BDEs) will press the northern flank of Slovyansk, seeking to bypass prepared defenses using heavy fire support, aiming to cut the P-79 road network.
3. IO COORDINATION: RF will use the diplomatic window (upcoming Dec 13 talks) to frame any UAF tactical withdrawal or defensive restructuring as a complete collapse, demanding territorial recognition based on the front line.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. OPERATIONAL COLLAPSE (DONBAS HUB): Successful GRAU delivery and maneuver breakthroughs lead to the encirclement of Konstantinovka and an unplanned withdrawal from the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk hub, resulting in catastrophic loss of equipment and C2 effectiveness in OC East.
2. STRATEGIC COERCION SUCCESS: RF uses the tactical breakthrough and amplified US political messaging to achieve an immediate, internationally enforced ceasefire that recognizes current occupied lines (DMZ Sovereignty), locking in the Siversk gain and stabilizing the front under terms highly unfavorable to Kyiv.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS