Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 112345Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL UPDATE: LRPF INTERDICTION WINDOW; SLOVYANSK ENCIRCLEMENT THREATENING OPERATIONAL COLLAPSE; TERRITORIAL CONCESSION PRESSURE.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry remains critical. RF forces maintain possession of Siversk and are exploiting the breach toward Slovyansk, while urban fighting intensifies in Konstantinovka. The immediate objective of RF forces is the operational isolation and subsequent reduction of the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk hub.

• Northern Axis: RF 3rd Army consolidation of the Siversk seizure is confirmed. RF information channels are disseminating "humanitarian" footage of Siversk (Colonelcassad), likely preparing the civilian population for long-term occupation.
• Southern Axis: RF claims of fighting around Mirnohrad (West/Southwest of Pokrovsk) indicate an expansion of the operational pressure radius, possibly aimed at further disrupting UAF LOCs supporting Konstantinovka.
• Key Terrain: The rail networks around Ilovaisk and Volnovakha remain critical choke points for the 260th GRAU logistics flow. Failure to interdict these targets will dramatically accelerate the combat loss rate in the Donbas.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Conditions are stable and permissive for mechanized maneuver and sustained kinetic operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are initiating hasty defense preparations on the northern flank of Slovyansk. High-value mobile reserves are fixed in the Konstantinovka urban fight and restricted by RF remote minelaying (Zemledeliye).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability: RF is introducing specialized assets, including the NRTC "Courier 2.0" Armed UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle). (Belief: 0.049814). This enhances close-combat lethality while potentially mitigating manpower losses in urban sectors like Konstantinovka. RF maintains overwhelming artillery potential dependent on the 260th GRAU delivery. Intention (Kinetic): Immediate intent is to synchronize the pincer movement, isolate the Donbas hub, and leverage artillery saturation (post-GRAU arrival) to force an operational withdrawal. Intention (Hybrid/IO/Diplomatic): Exploit tactical gains to force concessions in diplomatic talks. Specifically, reject any US/Kyiv proposal that does not recognize current occupation lines.

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed identification of the Courier 2.0 UGV suggests RF is adapting its operational approach to heavy urban fighting, moving toward unmanned systems to support troop density and clearing operations. This UGV may be deployed to counter UAF reliance on FPV drones in close quarters.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL)

The 260th GRAU munitions surge is confirmed mobile (SAR 0.00). The kinetic interdiction window remains highly compressed (estimated NLT 120200Z DEC). This logistic surge is the primary enabling factor for the MLCOA of artillery deluge and must be eliminated.

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, integrating specialized assets (UGV, Zemledeliye) and tactical gains (Siversk) with immediate IO output. The simultaneous push on Siversk, Konstantinovka, and Mirnohrad demonstrates cohesive operational-level planning by the RF Center Group of Forces (CGF).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness is critically strained by simultaneous high-intensity operations and internal manpower pressures (SZCh reassignment). The successful capture of six RF personnel by the 92nd Assault Brigade and the confirmed intercept of a Shahed UAV by the UAF P1-SUN interceptor drone provides localized boosts to morale and technological validation.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Deep Battle/Technology: Successful deployment and interception by the P1-SUN interceptor drone validates UAF counter-UAV capabilities, which are vital for mitigating RF deep strikes.
• Financial/Economic: The approval of the EU's sixth tranche (2.3 billion EUR) through the Ukraine Facility provides critical fiscal security for sustained defense. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Diplomatic Stance: Kyiv successfully rejected the US proposal involving partial troop withdrawal from Donetsk, maintaining the principle of territorial integrity.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The constraint remains time for LRPF execution and maneuver freedom (counter-mobility). Sustained financial support is confirmed, easing long-term acquisition but not solving immediate battlefield needs (munitions, mine-clearing assets).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO aggressively frames tactical gains (Siversk, Kurilovka claims) as humanitarian victories and evidence of strategic collapse.

1. Legitimization of Annexation: RF channels use Zelenskyy's mention of a referendum to imply instability regarding Ukrainian territorial claims, reinforcing the "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative.
2. Internal Mobilization: Ultranationalist channels (Alex Parker Returns) are propagating extreme rhetoric and calls for violence, suggesting an effort to maintain internal radical support and mobilization momentum.
3. Diplomatic Pressure: RF-aligned channels amplify perceived friction between Kyiv and the US regarding peace terms, leveraging reports about Trump's desire for "action, not talks," aiming to create internal coalition disagreement. (Belief: Disagreement on Peace Terms: 0.128600)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is supported by combat victories (POW, drone intercepts) and strong international financial guarantees. RF domestic sentiment shows continued stress from infrastructure failures and sustained reporting of internal socio-economic issues, though this has not translated into reduced military commitment.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Key Fact: The EU Council approved the 6th tranche of financial aid (2.3 billion EUR).
• Key Fact (Diplomacy): President Zelenskyy confirmed the US proposed a partial troop withdrawal from Donetsk (in exchange for demilitarization/free economic zone status), which Kyiv rejected. (Confidence: HIGH) This confirms high-level external pressure is part of the operational environment (MDCOA risk).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. ARTILLERY DELUGE (T+8 to T+24 HRS): Unless interdicted, the 260th GRAU materiel will enable a massive, unsustainable increase in RF fire rates against Konstantinovka and the northern approaches to Slovyansk, achieving fire superiority NLT 121000Z DEC.
2. ISOLATION OF KRAMATORSK: RF CGF will commit dedicated forces to secure the Konstantinovka axis, attempting to cut H-20 and T0504, thus isolating Kramatorsk from southwestern reinforcement and supply.
3. UGV DEPLOYMENT: Expect the Courier 2.0 UGV (or similar systems) to be deployed in close-combat urban environments (Konstantinovka) to conserve RF manpower and support forward reconnaissance.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. OPERATIONAL COLLAPSE (DONBAS HUB): The combined effect of successful GRAU delivery and maneuver breakthroughs forces an unplanned, hasty UAF operational withdrawal from the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk hub, leading to catastrophic equipment loss and disorganization in OC East.
2. STRATEGIC COERCION: RF uses the tactical breakthrough (Siversk/Konstantinovka) to successfully force an immediate, internationally brokered ceasefire based on the status quo ante bellum line (i.e., the current front line), with internal US political pressure (Trump) enabling the acceptance of unfavorable territorial concessions.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS