Situation Report

SENIOR MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IMMEDIATE UPDATE

TIME: 100330Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL LOGISTICS INTERDICTION WARNING (100600Z DEC) // RF AERIAL RECCE/STRIKE CONFIRMED ON DNIPROPETROVSK FLANK AXIS

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational situation remains CRITICAL across the Southern axis. New intelligence confirms Russian Federation (RF) efforts to exploit the newly claimed territorial gains near Ostapivske by initiating deep reconnaissance and potential precision strikes into the immediate operational rear.

• Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk Junction (NEW DATA): A confirmed group of Adversary Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is currently moving across Eastern Zaporizhzhia Oblast with a confirmed vector towards Synelnykivskyi Rayon, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Ref: UAF Air Force 100137Z DEC). This action directly threatens UAF reserve staging areas and the crucial logistics corridor connecting Dnipro to the Stepnohorsk salient. The Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration has activated an immediate warning (100135Z DEC).
• Chernihiv Sector: Isolated UAV activity reported moving toward Chernihiv City, demanding local resource allocation that diverts attention from the critical Southern Front.
• Pokrovsk Axis: RF information sources claim successful anti-drone operations over "Dimitrov" (likely Myrnograd/Pokrovsk area), suggesting RF maintains strong local air defense/counter-UAS capability, constraining UAF ISR/strike missions (Ref: Colonelcassad 100139Z DEC).

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change. Cold, low visibility conditions continue to favor low-level UAV infiltration and mechanized maneuver on the Huliaipole/Stepnohorsk front.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF Command Authority is currently managing a multi-domain threat environment: cognitive overload (IO), kinetic pressure (Huliaipole), and confirmed deep air penetration (Dnipropetrovsk). Control measures must prioritize the immediate protection of logistics and C2 in Dnipropetrovsk against the incoming air threat, while simultaneously confirming the status of the Huliaipole reserve commitment (Ref: Previous SITREP Action A).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent remains: Execute deep kinetic disruption to capitalize on the widening flanking maneuver.

• Flank Exploitation (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The UAV group vectored toward Synelnykivskyi Rayon confirms RF intent to utilize the operational depth created by the Ostapivske advance (reported 100230Z DEC) to conduct ISR, target identification, or direct precision strikes against C2 nodes, logistics depots, or forward operating bases in the Dnipropropetrovsk rear area. This directly supports the 100600Z DEC logistics strike window.
• ISR Denial (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The reported shoot-down of UAF 'Darts' near Pokrovsk suggests effective local RF Counter-UAS coordination, ensuring UAF ISR assets are unable to fully map RF tactical changes or target RF 38th GMRB/37th GMRB forward movement.
• Logistics Focus: The movement toward Synelnykivskyi Rayon is likely a preemptive attempt to interdict supply redirection measures implemented following the previous SITREP (Ref: Previous SITREP Action A - Redirecting critical supplies to the Lviv-Zviahel-Dnipro bypass).

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment efforts are synchronized with kinetic maneuver. The impending 100600Z DEC precision strike against UAF logistics (Ananyev corridor) is now validated by the reconnaissance effort targeting the Dnipropetrovsk rear. RF seeks a comprehensive logistical paralysis.

C. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, demonstrating rapid synchronization between ground maneuver (Ostapivske claim) and immediate air exploitation (UAV group deployment).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture remains reactive and defensively oriented. The immediate readiness level for air defense is stressed due to simultaneous threats across multiple oblasts (Chernihiv, Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk).

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The successful execution of evasive logistics actions (as recommended in previous SITREP) is now immediately contested by the RF UAV deployment, validating RF intelligence penetration regarding UAF logistical contingency planning. Confirmed contested ISR environment near Pokrovsk (Dimitrov) is a setback, limiting UAF C2 clarity.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The most acute constraints are mobile SHORAD assets and real-time BDA on the Huliaipole reserve commitment. The UAV vector towards Synelnykivskyi Rayon necessitates an immediate shift of available mobile SHORAD to the area.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations (IO) continue the strategy of cognitive saturation (distraction) coupled with localized tactical validation:

• Cognitive Saturation: Sustained high-volume reports on trivial domestic RF topics (Santa wages, electric scooter laws - Ref: TASS 100116Z/100132Z DEC). This maintains an operational tempo designed to exhaust international and high-level UAF analytical attention. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Tactical Validation: Colonelcassad reporting successful anti-drone activity reinforces the narrative of local RF superiority and successful defense against UAF deep strikes/ISR, degrading UAF morale among deployed drone operators. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Domestic Morale Target: The reporting of a Ukrainian citizen homicide in Czechia (Ref: RBK-Ukraine 100127Z DEC), while factual, contributes to domestic anxiety regarding the security and viability of the Ukrainian diaspora. (Confidence: MEDIUM)

B. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to benefit from the sustained focus on trivial domestic political issues internationally, which distracts from the ongoing kinetic escalation in Eastern Ukraine. The UAF counter-narrative launch remains critically past due (NLT 100300Z DEC from previous SITREP).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Probability 95%): Coordinated Logistics Interdiction and Flank Consolidation. RF UAV group reaches Synelnykivskyi Rayon NLT 100400Z DEC and conducts targeted ISR/designation, followed by long-range strike assets (LRS/missile) to hit identified C2 or logistics hubs. This precedes the critical 100600Z DEC precision strike on the Ananyev corridor. Concurrently, RF ground forces consolidate the gains near Ostapivske NLT 100400Z DEC, effectively securing the operational breach and preparing for further tactical advance toward Stepnohorsk.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Probability 70%): Logistics Decapitation leading to C2 Degradation. RF UAV strike against a critical, previously un-relocated UAF C2 node in the Dnipropetrovsk rear NLT 100430Z DEC. Success here, coupled with the 100600Z DEC logistics strike, achieves localized paralysis, allowing RF 35th Army forces to initiate rapid operational encirclement of Stepnohorsk NLT 100600Z DEC, leveraging the logistical choke point.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (Updated for 100330Z DEC 25)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

The immediate air threat against the operational rear mandates shifting ISR prioritization to tracking the UAV group and subsequent potential strike platforms.

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The primary tactical imperative is to protect the operational rear (Dnipro/Synelnykivskyi) against the incoming air threat and finally confirm the Huliaipole reserve status before the 100600Z DEC logistics strike.

1. AIR DEFENSE AND COUNTER-ISR (J3/J2)

• Action A (Immediate SHORAD Deployment - CRITICAL): Immediately divert and redeploy all available mobile Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) assets currently not tasked with frontline PVO (Air Defense) protection to establish a hardened defensive perimeter around identified critical C2 nodes and logistics hubs within Synelnykivskyi Rayon NLT 100400Z DEC.
• Action B (UAV Interdiction): Utilize local tactical air assets or rotary wing platforms (if available) to attempt immediate interdiction of the incoming UAV group, leveraging their currently known vector.
• Action C (Comms Security): Initiate EMCON (Emission Control) protocols for all C2 nodes in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast NLT 100430Z DEC to deny target correlation by incoming ISR platforms.

2. KINETIC OPERATIONS & MANEUVER (J3)

• Action A (Huliaipole Stabilization - ABSOLUTE CRITICALITY): If the reserve commitment status remains unconfirmed by 100400Z DEC, escalate the commitment order via secondary command channels, bypassing compromised nodes if necessary. The window for stabilizing the Huliaipole flank is now measured in minutes, not hours.
• Action B (Stepnohorsk Contingency): Forward commanders at Stepnohorsk must be placed on Tactical Withdrawal Alert (Level 2), prepared to execute pre-planned exfiltration routes toward Dnipropetrovsk should the 100600Z DEC logistics strike prove decisive and the reserve commitment fail.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION (P7 - Cognitive Domain)

• Action A (Counter-Abandonment Narrative): The NCA address countering the "inevitable defeat" narrative is now 100% past due. Launch the prepared communication immediately, regardless of formatting or delivery delays. Delaying further cedes the cognitive battlefield to RF saturation efforts.

//END OF REPORT//