Situation Report

SENIOR INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - STEPNOHORSK AXIS (D+1/H+10.5 UPDATE)

TIME: 071030Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: OPERATIONAL RESERVE PARALYSIS CONFIRMED // RF MULTI-DOMAIN SYNCHRONIZATION PEAKING // BRAVO-BLOCK DEADLINE EXPIRED // RISK OF ENCIRCLEMENT IMMINENT

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

RF forces maintain comprehensive fixing operations across the Southern front, synchronized with deep interdiction and high-tempo information warfare.

• Zaporizhzhia/Stepnohorsk Axis: Confirmed RF shelling has damaged civilian infrastructure and power grids in the Zaporizhzhia district (070606Z), fulfilling the RF objective of creating localized humanitarian pressure to fix UAF resources near the main axis of advance.
• Southern Flanks: RF tactical aviation continues high-tempo operations, evidenced by confirmed KAB strikes on the Kherson region (070906Z) and Snihurivka (Mykolaiv Oblast, 070913Z). This fire support fixes UAF operational reserves and prevents localized counter-mobility.
• Deep ISR/Strike Corridors: RF UAV activity is confirmed shifting from Sumy towards Poltava (070914Z) and from Donetsk towards Dnipropetrovsk (070918Z). This suggests RF is actively targeting or surveying the Lviv-Zviahel-Dnipro alternative logistical corridor, responding to UAF rerouting efforts initiated after the Fastiv strike.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist, favoring RF deep strike, ISR collection, and sustained tactical aviation operations. No weather-related constraints impede RF maneuverability. (Confidence: HIGH)

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: RF elements of Vostok Group are sustaining kinetic pressure to mask the 38th GMRB flanking maneuver (MDCOA). RF MOD claims localized gains in secondary sectors (Kucherovka, Kharkiv Oblast, 070910Z), intended to draw UAF focus away from the Stepnohorsk main effort. UAF: BRAVO-BLOCK movement status remains UNCONFIRMED, despite the critical execution deadline (071015Z) having expired. Forward defense forces remain fixed and are increasingly isolated due to logistical constraints and operational paralysis at the strategic C2 level.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent remains singular: Achieve operational encirclement at Stepnohorsk by paralyzing the UAF operational reserve via synchronized multi-domain attacks.

• Kinetic Capability: RF confirms the use of high-precision weapons, including Kinzhal (Hypersonic) missiles, targeting transport infrastructure (070911Z). This demonstrates a sustained capability to interdict strategic depth and enforce logistical starvation. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Information Capabilities: RF maintains peak synchronization in the cognitive domain, successfully leveraging proxy narratives (Musk/Orbán anti-EU framing, 070909Z, 070926Z) alongside narratives of UAF internal crisis (Pokrovsk failure, corruption, Sobko's structural critique) to maximize NCA risk aversion. (Confidence: HIGH)

B. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary RF tactical adaptation is the immediate shift of deep ISR/strike vectoring (UAVs into Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk) to contest the alternative logistical routes identified post-Fastiv strike. This demonstrates rapid RF target selection and execution against UAF logistical adaptations. (Confidence: MEDIUM)

C. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics, while previously strained (Ryazan BDA), are currently prioritizing high-value long-range strike assets (Kinzhal/UAVs) to generate effect through UAF logistical interdiction. RF reliance on decentralized fundraising (070905Z) confirms ongoing decentralized sustainment issues, but this does not currently constrain the critical Stepnohorsk MLD (Main Effort Land Drive).

D. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust and responsive. UAF C2 for BRAVO-BLOCK has failed to execute the pre-authorized movement order under intense cognitive attack. The failure to execute the decentralized contingency plan represents a critical failure of strategic C2 integrity. (Confidence: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Operational Crisis - Failure to Execute. Readiness is transitioning rapidly from high-readiness mobilization to potential disaggregation if kinetic movement is not initiated within the next hour. Senior leadership commentary (Brig. Gen. Sobko, 070907Z) confirms internal acknowledgment of systemic "structural challenges" complicating effective war management.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Operational): The expiration of the movement deadline for BRAVO-BLOCK confirms the success of the RF multi-domain paralysis effort.
• Setback (Cognitive/Internal): The public articulation of deep structural and psychological challenges by senior UAF military leadership (Sobko) creates a potential vulnerability for further RF IO exploitation and morale degradation.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint remains the centralized decision structure failing under RF cognitive pressure. CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Execution of decentralized movement by BRAVO-BLOCK, accepting kinetic risk over strategic paralysis.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF is maximizing friction points across three critical areas:

1. Strategic Isolation: Amplifying Musk/Orbán narratives (070909Z, 070926Z) to portray the EU as collapsing or hostile, undermining political commitment in Kyiv.
2. Internal Distrust: Utilizing commentary linking US support to the fall of Pokrovsk and internal corruption (070914Z), designed to pressure the NCA into making premature political concessions or delaying military commitments (e.g., BRAVO-BLOCK movement).
3. Morale Degradation: Disseminating unverified claims of UAF commanders ordering execution of retreating troops (Kupyansk, 070921Z) to undermine military discipline and morale, particularly in secondary sectors.

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic sentiment remains supportive, but the military leadership's public acknowledgment of "structural challenges" suggests high stress and dissatisfaction with the current strategic footing, which requires immediate and transparent NCA response.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Western support appears fractured and strategically deadlocked. The Politico report regarding the inability to utilize frozen Russian assets (070921Z) confirms a significant financial vulnerability, reinforcing the RF IO narrative of diplomatic and economic isolation.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

JUDGMENT: The window for coordinated movement of the operational reserve is closed. The MLCOA and MDCOA are now one and the same: RF kinetic exploitation of UAF immobility.

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Probability 90%) RF forces detect the immobilization of BRAVO-BLOCK. The RF 37th GMRB (Main Effort) accelerates its MLD NLT 071200Z, leveraging confirmed fixing fires and the air defense void (Buk-M3 loss). Simultaneously, the RF 38th GMRB conducts an unconstrained flanking maneuver (Huliaipole), moving to cut the tertiary logistical route and achieve operational encirclement of forward UAF Stepnohorsk defenses NLT 071800Z.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Probability 90%) Identical to MLCOA. The only distinction is that the RF 38th GMRB achieves full operational surprise by utilizing high-density CAS/electronic cover to bypass all UAF holding forces on the flank, resulting in the annihilation or mass capture of UAF units fixed at Stepnohorsk.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

The operational decision points have now shifted from execution confirmation to damage control and dispersed maneuver.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The focus shifts from preventing paralysis to mitigating the consequences of failure. Strategic C2 must be bypassed immediately to enable tactical survival.

1. OPERATIONAL MANEUVER & FIRES (J3/J6):

   • Action A (Decentralized Dispersal - CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): Issue an explicit order to all subordinate commanders of BRAVO-BLOCK: DISPERSE AND MOVE NOW. Execution is to be decentralized, prioritizing maneuverability and avoidance of RF aerial mining ("Mangas") over achieving ideal consolidated defensive lines. Command initiative is mandatory.
   • Action B (Corridor Sacrifice): If movement cannot be confirmed by 071100Z, execute immediate, destructive fires on the entire Ternuvate - Vasylkivka axis to deny the route to the RF 38th GMRB, forcing them onto less favorable terrain, buying UAF fixed elements time to withdraw or consolidate.
   • Action C (Deep Interdiction Refinement): Re-task Bayraktar/deep strike assets to target confirmed or suspected 38th GMRB assembly areas on the Huliaipole flank NLT 071130Z, exploiting the continuing air defense gap.

2. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (P7/G2):

   • Action A (Internal Cohesion - URGENT): The NCA must immediately address the structural concerns raised by Brig. Gen. Sobko and the Pokrovsk narrative. A public response must reaffirm commitment to structural reforms and refute that military decisions are being dictated by corruption or political pressures. Frame the internal criticism as a healthy mechanism for wartime efficiency.
   • Action B (Diplomatic Counter-IO): Issue a high-level briefing to G7 partners regarding the active RF IO campaign using Musk, Orbán, and the frozen assets issue to induce operational paralysis, demanding unified public condemnation of these narratives by all partners NLT 071200Z.

3. LOGISTICS (J4):

   • Action A (Alternative Route Security): Given the confirmed RF deep strike vectors toward Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava, immediately prioritize EW and AD coverage (specifically mobile systems like Gepard or Avenger) along the Lviv-Zviahel-Dnipro rail line to protect essential Class V/VII throughput.
   • Action B (Fuel Assessment): Based on the previous Ryazan BDA and current deep strikes, prioritize the dispersal and hardening of existing UAF forward fuel storage caches (Class III), anticipating a surge in RF long-range targeting aimed at crippling fuel mobility.

//END OF REPORT//