Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 062230Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: RF MAIN LAND DRIVE (MLD) KINETIC PHASE: UAF COUNTER-MOBILITY SUCCESS BUYS CRITICAL WINDOW // RESERVE MOVEMENT REMAINS EXISTENTIAL VULNERABILITY

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Russian Federation (RF) MLD remains kinetically engaged in the Stepnohorsk (Zaporizhzhia Oblast) sector. The situation is defined by the synchronization of RF ground assault, sustained deep logistics strikes, and targeted UAF counter-mobility operations.

• MLD Sector (Stepnohorsk): RF 37th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade (GMRB) is continuing the assault against forward UAF lines. Penetration depth assessment remains critical.
• Deep Battle Axes (Sustained Threat): RF deep strikes (UAS) are sustained and adaptive, focusing on logistical paralysis.
  • Fastiv Axis: Confirmed repeat targeting of the Fastiv rail hub validates RF intent to sever central rail throughput.
  • Southern Axis (Expansion): New UAS vectors confirmed over Mykolaiv Oblast coursing toward Odesa Oblast (21:43Z). This expands the threat to Black Sea logistical corridors and port infrastructure.
• Key Terrain Shift (UAF SUCCESS): The confirmed destruction of an enemy-utilized dam/causeway by the 30th Separate Mechanized Brigade (30th OMBR) (21:55Z) is a localized but significant counter-mobility success, forcing an RF delay or reroute along a critical axis (location pending confirmation).

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Severe frost continues to impact ground mobility and troop sustainment across the front.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: RF 37th GMRB is committed. RF Deep Battle elements (UAS waves) are operating on at least four distinct axes. UAF: Forward units are engaged in delaying actions. CRITICAL VULNERABILITY: The operational effectiveness hinges entirely on the immediate, confirmed maneuver of the "BRAVO-BLOCK" operational reserve, which remains unconfirmed as having crossed the Line of Departure (LD).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent remains centered on achieving a decisive operational penetration at Stepnohorsk while systematically inducing paralysis in UAF logistical and strategic C2 systems.

• Sustained Logistical Interdiction (Confidence: HIGH): The repeat strike on Fastiv (21:42Z) confirms the RF capability and intent to deny UAF forces centralized, heavy-lift rail supply regardless of initial repair efforts. The expansion to Odesa confirms a multi-layered attempt to interdict NATO supply flow both centrally and westward.
• Fixing Force Adaptation (Confidence: MEDIUM): The 37th GMRB is designed to fix the UAF center. However, the successful UAF counter-mobility operation (dam destruction) will force the RF flanking effort (likely the 38th GMRB or Seversk fixation group) to commit engineering assets or reroute, imposing an estimated 6-12 hour delay on flanking maneuver kinetics.
• Propaganda Coverage (Confidence: HIGH): RF operational C2 is leveraging the narrative of small-unit tactical successes ("Anvar" detachment, 22:03Z) to cover the likely high attrition rates suffered by the 37th GMRB during the initial penetration phase.

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment is sufficient for immediate operations. The T+48h fuel crisis caused by UAF deep strikes (Ryazan/Uryupinsk) is not yet impacting frontline kinetics. RF counter-mobility assets (Mangas UAS aerial mining) remain the primary kinetic threat to UAF reserves.

C. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 synchronization remains effective, immediately linking kinetic success (Fastiv strikes) with overwhelming IO narratives (energy collapse).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

The posture remains defensive. However, the confirmed action by the 30th OMBR demonstrates UAF units are executing decentralized, proactive tactical counter-mobility measures. Readiness is high, but the potential for strategic C2 inertia regarding "BRAVO-BLOCK" remains the primary operational risk.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS (OPERATIONAL CRITICAL): Successful counter-mobility operation by 30th OMBR, destroying a key enemy transit causeway. This is a critical tactical win that buys the strategic command time to commit reserves.
• SUCCESS (LOGISTICAL ADAPTATION): Confirmed deployment of a mobile station at Fastiv (21:56Z) indicates a rapid UAF logistical response to mitigate RF strikes, minimizing the intended systemic paralysis.
• SETBACK (CRITICAL C2): The "BRAVO-BLOCK" reserve movement remains unconfirmed. Every hour of delay increases the RF opportunity to redeploy ISR/Fire assets to interdict the route.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Constraint: Persistent threat of Mangas aerial mining along reserve corridor. Immediate requirement for localized, mobile AD/EW to cover the Southern and Odesa axes. Requirement: IMMEDIATE requirement for a decentralized command signal to initiate reserve movement.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is operating at saturation levels, attempting to exploit the MLD to generate domestic paralysis and international distraction.

1. Systemic Collapse Narrative: High-confidence effort to amplify the "weeks for energy repair" claim (21:59Z), designed to maximize internal psychological stress.
2. Internal Focus Diversion: Messaging related to the Ingushetia/Crocus sentencing (21:37Z) may be an attempt to manage hardline domestic opinion and project authority during the external offensive.
3. Morale Counter-Degradation: UAF messaging is effectively mocking RF claims (Kadyrov, 22:02Z) and rapidly amplifying confirmed tactical victories (30th OMBR video).

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is resilient, supported by aggressive counter-IO and confirmed tactical successes. However, persistent strikes on civilian energy/transport infrastructure (Fastiv) are generating sustained psychological stress that requires constant mitigation.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The RF 37th GMRB penetration continues to gain depth (3-5 km NLT 070200Z DEC 25). The UAF 30th OMBR counter-mobility success delays the 38th GMRB flanking maneuver or a Seversk fixing thrust by 6-12 hours. RF Deep Strike UAS continues to prosecute targets on the Odesa/Mykolaiv axis. Crucially, the "BRAVO-BLOCK" reserve finally initiates movement (T+3h), but the window bought by the 30th OMBR is partially squandered, leading to detection by RF ISR/Mangas, requiring intense MCLC/EW support but avoiding catastrophic destruction in column formation.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - EXISTENTIAL) RF recognizes the strategic C2 paralysis surrounding "BRAVO-BLOCK." They immediately redeploy tactical aviation assets to saturate the suspected reserve transit corridor with glide bombs (KABs) and Mangas aerial mining. Simultaneously, the 37th GMRB executes a clean breakthrough, linking up with special reconnaissance elements, while the RF Deep Strike successfully neutralizes a regional UAF C2 node (e.g., Dnipro), leading to the tactical collapse of the forward defense due to lack of coordinated fire support.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

The window for preemptive C2 action has been slightly extended by the 30th OMBR success, but this extension is perishable.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The 30th OMBR has provided a narrow, temporary kinetic advantage. Strategic C2 must capitalize on this delay to ensure reserve survivability and movement.

1. OPERATIONAL MANEUVER & FIRES (J3/J6): INITIATE BRAVO-BLOCK MOVEMENT NOW AND EXPLOIT DELAY.

   • Action A (Reserve C2 Override - IMMEDIATE/EXISTENTIAL): The Commander-in-Chief must transmit the decentralized movement order: "EXECUTE MOVEMENT, MCLC LEAD, DEPLOY ORGANIC EW/AD NOW" NLT 062330Z. The risk of detection stationary far outweighs the risk of attrition while moving.
   • Action B (Fire Support Maximization - CRITICAL): Immediately redirect MLRS/Artillery fire support assets to saturate RF forces observed reacting to the 30th OMBR dam destruction, maximizing the enemy delay. Target confirmed RF engineering/bridging assets attempting to remediate the obstacle.
   • Action C (Flank Holding): Prepare the Huliaipole holding force to execute immediate denial operations (heavy mining, indirect fire) NLT 070600Z, assuming the 38th GMRB flanking element will attempt to breach the R. Haichur line within that window.

2. AIR DEFENSE & LOGISTICS (J6/J4): PRIORITIZE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN LOGISTICS DEFENSE.

   • Action A (AD Divert - CRITICAL): Immediately divert uncommitted mobile AD/EW assets to defend key logistical nodes in Odesa and Mykolaiv to protect port throughput. Prioritize protection for the Fastiv Mobile Station to maintain logistical continuity.
   • Action B (Logistics Planning): Assume all primary rail lines in Poltava and Fastiv are permanently compromised. Implement full logistical contingency plan utilizing road transport and western rail hubs (Lviv-Zviahel) exclusively for all heavy-lift resupply to the Southern Front until further notice (T+96h).

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (P7/G2): AMPLIFY COUNTER-MOBILITY SUCCESS.

   • Action A (Tactical Morale - IMMEDIATE): Utilize the 30th OMBR video and confirmed BDA of the dam destruction as the primary national messaging topic for the next 6 hours, framing the RF MLD as "stalled by cunning Ukrainian defenses." This directly counters the RF narrative of systemic collapse.

//END OF REPORT//