Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (INTREP)

TIME: 061400Z DEC 25

SUBJECT: MLD LAUNCH IMMINENT // AIR DEFENSE EXPLOITATION WINDOW CRITICAL // STRATEGIC LOGISTICS GAINS CONFIRMED

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational axis remains critically focused on Stepnohorsk (Zaporizhzhia Oblast), where the RF Main Land Drive (MLD) initiation is assessed as imminent (NLT 2100Z 06 DEC). The logistical lifeline at Zolotonosha (Cherkasy Oblast) remains under critical RF targeting pressure.

• Zaporizhzhia: UAF intelligence (HUR) confirms the successful destruction of an RF Buk-M3 SAM system in the tactical depth (13:28Z), validating the high-value kinetic gain reported earlier. This creates a critical, perishable window for air superiority exploitation over the MLD axis. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Rear: RF continues fixation efforts, confirmed by a successful RF drone strike on a target in Nizhyn (Chernihiv Oblast, 13:15Z) and successful UAF interception of 6x RF UAVs over Bryansk Oblast, Russia (13:17Z), indicating ongoing cross-border reconnaissance and strike activity.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors affecting Operations

The short-term forecast indicates night-time freezing temperatures and strong, stormy winds for the following day (07 DEC, 13:25Z).

• Impact Assessment (Judgment): Strong winds will constrain RF deep-strike UAV (Shahed/Geran) effectiveness and potentially degrade the precision of high-altitude ISR platforms. However, freezing temperatures increase energy demand and compound the effect of the ongoing energy grid strikes, simultaneously complicating UAF logistics and troop endurance.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: RF elements are in final staging for the MLD. Logistics are confirmed to be under severe pressure following the UAF deep strike campaign (Ryazan NPZ). RF is attempting to compensate for tactical AD losses (Buk-M3) by increasing kinetic strike tempo. UAF: BRAVO-BLOCK reserve movement remains the critical operational maneuver, still constrained by the Mangas aerial mining threat. UAF successfully confirmed strategic strikes against RF logistics/industry.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is locked: Achieve kinetic breakthrough at Stepnohorsk and strategically paralyze UAF C2 and sustainment before RF logistical constraints (fuel shortage post-Ryazan) become acute.

B. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the continued aggressive utilization of deep strikes despite severe logistical constraints (Temryuk/Ryazan NPZ losses). This suggests RF command is prioritizing the MLD launch over long-term sustainment planning, accepting high tactical risk for a rapid operational gain.

C. Logistics and Sustainment Status

CRITICAL FACT: UAF General Staff officially confirms successful strikes against the Ryazan NPZ and a factory manufacturing shell casings (13:22Z).

• Assessment (Judgment): This significantly increases the probability of an RF fuel crisis across the Southern Group of Forces (SGF) within T+48 hours and will severely constrain RF artillery resupply in the medium term. This strategic constraint reinforces the MLCOA requirement for a rapid victory rather than an extended engagement.
• RF Tactical Friction: SIGINT/OSINT suggests specific logistical friction, with tactical units (A. Nevsky Volunteer Brigade) experiencing disruption in the supply of critical replacement parts (PKM machine gun components), confirmed by Dempster-Shafer analysis (0.299 belief score). (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

D. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing strategic fire support, maneuver preparation, and IO messaging. Targeting doctrine shows operational coherence, focused on degrading mobility (Mangas) and C2/Energy (Zelenodolsk/Zolotonosha).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is defensive, transitioning to reserve counter-attack capacity. Readiness remains high, buoyed by domestic morale (ZSU Day commemoration) and confirmed strategic kinetic successes. The destruction of the Buk-M3 validates the G2's targeting process and creates a direct, actionable tactical advantage.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Strategic Kinetic Success: Confirmed destruction of the Ryazan NPZ and a shell casing manufacturing plant.
2. Tactical Kinetic Success: Confirmed destruction of a Buk-M3 SAM system near the MLD epicenter (Zaporizhzhia).
3. Deep ISR Success: Successful interception of 6x RF UAVs over Bryansk Oblast, demonstrating active deep reconnaissance and/or strike capability.

Setbacks:

1. Continued systemic energy stress following the Zelenodolsk TPP strike.
2. Successful RF drone strike on Nizhyn (target specifics pending).

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate, maximum exploitation of the BUK destruction air defense hole to pre-emptively attrite the 37th GMRB assault elements. CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The limited time remaining before MLD launch, compounded by the Mangas mining threat against the BRAVO-BLOCK reserve corridor.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO strategy is two-pronged: Justify internal escalation while undermining external support.

1. Internal Justification: Kadyrov’s "retribution" messaging (13:22Z) frames massive strikes as a successful and necessary reaction to Grozny/Border attacks. Basurin (13:10Z) continues to reinforce historical narratives concerning "Kyiv regime criminality" to sustain ideological motivation.
2. External Weakness: RF state media (TASS, Operatsiya Z) amplifies reports of internal EU divisions (Estonian ex-President quote) and political instability in Western capitals (Tower of London protest) to project an image of fading Western resolve.

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic morale remains robust, leveraging the symbolism of ZSU Day (Dec 6th). Commemorative events (Zaporizhzhia tree planting, 13:31Z) reinforce long-term societal commitment and unity, countering the RF IO goal of psychological degradation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Negotiations Framing: HUR Head Budanov is actively managing expectations regarding peace talks, stressing the need for secrecy to achieve success (13:25Z).
• Disruptive Messaging: The alleged quote from US Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker ("closer than ever to peace," 13:27Z) is highly disruptive and contradicts the current operational reality. This message will be immediately weaponized by RF IO to sow distrust between UAF and NATO partners.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(CRITICAL, HIGH CONFIDENCE) MLD Launch, Kinetic Escalation, and Reserve Interdiction. RF initiates the 37th GMRB MLD at Stepnohorsk NLT 2100Z 06 DEC. Concurrent heavy Kh-101/UAV strikes target the Zolotonosha logistical node, aiming for a catastrophic failure. RF relies on the Mangas UAS minefields to achieve tactical stalling and attrition of the BRAVO-BLOCK reserve, slowing their arrival to allow the 37th GMRB to establish a defensible penetration depth.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(CRITICAL DANGER, HIGH CONFIDENCE) Operational Isolation via Logistical and Grid Collapse. RF successfully executes the MLCOA. The strong winds/cold (new factor) degrade UAF C-UAS efforts against Mangas and slow mechanized movement. Logistics trains (especially rail) are paralyzed by the Zolotonosha strike combined with grid instability. The 38th GMRB (Huliaipole flank) executes a rapid, unobserved bypass maneuver, creating a large-scale encirclement and forcing the piecemeal sacrifice of the BRAVO-BLOCK reserve to prevent the total collapse of the Southern Front C2.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. OPERATIONAL MANEUVER (J3): MAXIMIZE BUK EXPLOITATION WINDOW.

   • Action A (Air Superiority): Immediately saturate the operational area near Stepnohorsk with deep-strike UAS platforms (e.g., Bayraktar/Switchblade 600) and conduct suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) operations against identified residual mobile AD assets (TOR/PANTSIR).
   • Action B (Reserve Movement): Maintain the modified EXECUTION OF BRAVO-BLOCK MOVEMENT NOW with MCLC/Mine Roller lead. Integrate ground-based EW units (Bukovel) into the vanguard to provide dedicated jamming against Mangas C2 links, mitigating the severe weather impact risk.
   • Justification: The AD window is highly perishable; immediate exploitation maximizes attrition of the assault force. Integrity of the reserve is non-negotiable.

2. AIR DEFENSE ALLOCATION (J3/AD): ABSOLUTE PROTECTION OF ZOLOTONOSHA.

   • Action: Ignore fixation efforts (e.g., Chernihiv/Nizhyn vectors) unless the threat reaches designated strategic C2/NPP nodes. Reinforce mobile SHORAD assets around the Zolotonosha rail/road junction and prepare secondary/tertiary AD positions to mitigate success of a first strike.
   • Justification: Zolotonosha remains the center of gravity for UAF logistics sustaining the Stepnohorsk defense.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (P7/G2): LEVERAGE LOGISTICAL SUCCESSES.

   • Action: Immediately launch a coordinated, high-profile media campaign (domestic and international) emphasizing the strategic impact of the Ryazan NPZ and shell casing factory strikes. Frame this as a deliberate, decisive blow against RF strategic sustainment, directly contrasting the RF narrative of "retribution."
   • Justification: Capitalizing on kinetic success counters RF IO, boosts domestic morale on ZSU Day, and reinforces Western confidence in UAF capacity for deep operational effects.

4. LOGISTICS AND ENDURANCE (J4): WET/COLD WEATHER MITIGATION.

   • Action: Prioritize distribution of cold-weather gear, Class I (food), and Class III (POL/batteries) to frontline and reserve forces, anticipating sustained high winds and freezing temperatures which will increase non-combat attrition and energy demand.
   • Justification: Proactive mitigation of environmental factors prevents non-kinetic degradation of combat effectiveness during the MLD.

//END OF REPORT//