Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 031530Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL SITUATION: CONFIRMED DUAL-AXIS THREAT ESCALATES TO TRIPLE-AXIS PRESSURE WITH RF POKROVSK CLAIM; UAF MUST RATION RESERVE CAPACITY.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-SUM)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment has deteriorated rapidly, shifting from a dual-axis threat to simultaneous pressure across three distinct operational axes:

1. Zaporizhzhia ME (Stepnohorsk): RF 37th Guards MRB remains staged for the Mechanized Land Drive (MLD) following continuous KAB saturation. (UNCHANGED)
2. Zaporizhzhia Flank (Chervone/Huliaipole): RF 38th Guards MRB confirmed breakthrough at Chervone, creating an immediate flanking threat to Huliaipole. (CRITICAL)
3. Donetsk Eastern Axis (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiisk): NEW CRITICAL VECTOR. RF Ministry of Defense (MoD) and associated sources claim the "liberation" of Krasnoarmeysk (Pokrovsk) by the 30th Separate Guards Motorised Rifle Brigade (30th SMRB) (Tsentr Group of Forces). Pokrovsk is a vital rail and road hub; loss of control would severely fracture UAF logistics and C2 across the entire Eastern Front. (HIGH CONFIDENCE FACT - RF CLAIM; MEDIUM CONFIDENCE JUDGMENT - TERRITORIAL CONTROL)
4. Northern Fixation: Vovchansk-Kupiansk line pressure continues to successfully fix UAF Northern reserves.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The predicted Geomagnetic Storm remains active, potentially interfering with SATCOM and GPS guidance systems, affecting both RF KAB targeting and UAF precision-guided munitions capabilities. The storm creates a window of high volatility for C2 links. (HIGH CONFIDENCE FACT)

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are in active defense, prioritizing containment of the Chervone breach while bracing for the Stepnohorsk MLD. The unconfirmed Pokrovsk threat demands immediate verification and potential deployment of strategic reserves. RF is coordinating efforts between the Vostok Group (Zaporizhzhia) and the Tsentr Group (Pokrovsk), confirming a high degree of operational synchronization across various RF Operational Commands.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT-ASSESS)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent is to achieve simultaneous tactical breakthroughs on the Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk axes, forcing the UAF High Command to commit its limited reserve capacity to stabilize multiple critical points, thereby denying UAF the ability to conduct an effective counter-exploitation.

• RF Tsentr Group Commitment (30th SMRB): The identification of the 30th SMRB at Pokrovsk confirms that the RF is prepared to utilize large, committed formations from separate operational groupings to prosecute simultaneous, major offensive actions. This suggests adequate personnel and materiel sustainability despite deep UAF strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE JUDGMENT)
• Logistics Vulnerability (Amplified): UAF strikes hit fuel depots in Tambov and Voronezh. This strategic success must now be leveraged via interdiction of rolling stock, as the 260th GRAU Arsenal (Score 26.12) maintains critical ammunition throughput for the Zaporizhzhia axis assault. (HIGH CONFIDENCE FACT/JUDGMENT)
• Technological Standardization: The standardization of Unmanned Systems Forces within the Sever Group confirms the doctrinal shift to incorporate UGVs (e.g., Kuryer) as standard breach technology across all RF operational commands, increasing the threat level on all axes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE FACT)

B. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the execution of the Pokrovsk offensive (30th SMRB), signaling a rapid acceleration and expansion of RF operational objectives aimed at disrupting the entire UAF operational design in Eastern Ukraine.

C. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF is demonstrating resilience. While fuel supply is degraded by UAF strikes, the critical ammunition pipeline (260th GRAU) remains highly functional. RF is simultaneously promoting internal economic measures (credit holidays) to manage long-term war-related economic stress.

D. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective, demonstrating successful synchronization of deep logistics attacks (against UAF GLOCs near Pavlohrad - previous report), main effort MLD preparation (Zaporizhzhia), and secondary major attacks (Pokrovsk).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE-FORCE)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is high, but strategic reserve capacity is strained. The commitment of reserves to contain the Chervone breach (Protocol BRAVO-BLOCK) must be maintained, but now requires immediate re-evaluation against the Pokrovsk threat.

• Administrative Modernization: The formal launch of the ZSU digital "Budget" system remains a key strategic counter-IO success, confirming commitment to transparency critical for NATO partner confidence.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Strategic deep strikes against RF fuel infrastructure (Tambov/Voronezh).
• Setback: Confirmed breakthrough at Chervone and the high-impact, unconfirmed tactical penetration at Pokrovsk, which threatens the operational integrity of the Eastern Front.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the finite strategic reserve pool. UAF cannot afford to stabilize both Huliaipole and Pokrovsk simultaneously without exposing a third critical point. Enhanced Mobile Air Defense (MOG) capability remains a persistent constraint against KAB saturation.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO immediately seized upon the alleged Pokrovsk success (031502Z) to amplify the narrative of UAF collapse and systemic defensive failure. This narrative synchronizes with the ongoing exploitation of the Language Law and the $19 Billion budget deficit to undermine the UAF diplomatic delegation meeting with US proxies (Dec 3rd).

• Vector 3: Military Momentum: The Pokrovsk claim is designed to generate panic, forcing immediate, poorly planned UAF reserve commitments. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment will be highly sensitive to verification of the Pokrovsk claim. UAF must rapidly verify the situation and issue a controlled, truthful statement to prevent RF psychological operations from achieving tactical disruption.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The operational success of deep strikes (Tambov/Voronezh) provides kinetic leverage, but this leverage will be immediately eroded if the Pokrovsk claim is verified, giving RF diplomatic leverage in the ongoing US proxy meeting.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Coordinated Triple-Axis Offensive Squeeze. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Pokrovsk Exploitation: RF 30th SMRB exploits tactical gains, focusing on seizing rail yards and major intersections within Pokrovsk (NLT 031700Z DEC 25).
2. Huliaipole Draw: RF 38th GMRB pushes from Chervone toward Huliaipole (NLT 031700Z DEC 25) to draw UAF Southern reserves North.
3. Stepnohorsk MLD: RF 37th GMRB initiates the final mechanized breach at Stepnohorsk, utilizing "Kuryer" UGVs against thinned defenses, timed to coincide with peak UAF confusion over reserve commitment (NLT 031900Z DEC 25).

• TIMELINE: The next 4 hours (until 031900Z) are the critical decision window.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: C2 Paralysis via Strategic Strike and Dual-Decapitation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF exploits the simultaneous kinetic operations at Pokrovsk and Zaporizhzhia by launching synchronized high-speed missile strikes (Iskander/Kinzhal) aimed at Eastern Operational Command C2 nodes (Donetsk Axis) and the 5th Assault Brigade forward C2 nodes (Zaporizhzhia Axis). This dual C2 paralysis, coupled with the geomagnetic storm interference, eliminates UAF ability to coordinate reserve movement, leading to operational collapse on both critical fronts.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CCIR)

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS (ACTION-INTEL)

1. Reserve Allocation and Verification (IMMEDIATE - J3/J5):
   • Phase 1: Verification (031530Z - 031630Z): Divert maximum available ISR assets (drones, manned reconnaissance) to confirm the RF claims regarding Pokrovsk territorial control (CR Priority 1).
   • Phase 2: Commitment (031630Z onwards): Based on verification, J5 must identify the minimum viable force package from Strategic Reserve (SR) needed to stabilize Pokrovsk's western flank (e.g., 93rd Mechanized Brigade elements, if available). Maintain Protocol "BRAVO-BLOCK" commitment at Huliaipole (82nd Air Assault) despite the Pokrovsk pressure; do not withdraw them.
2. Electronic Warfare/Air Defense (IMMEDIATE - J6/J3):
   • Exploit Geomagnetic Storm: Immediately deploy EW assets to broadcast wide-spectrum jamming on known "Gerbera" control bands (Protocol BRAVO-BLOCK). Utilize the natural storm interference to re-enable Mobile Fire Group (MOG) operational effectiveness against KAB launch zones.
3. Targeting (URGENT - J2/JFS):
   • Amplify Logistics Disruption: Immediately update Target Package 007-D (Deep Strike) to shift priority from static fuel storage to RF rail-tanker transshipment yards and rolling stock near Rostov and Crimea. This capitalizes on the successful static fuel strikes and amplifies the transportation bottleneck.
   • Pokrovsk Counter-Fire: Pre-position artillery and rocket systems to interdict confirmed 30th SMRB routes of advance West of Pokrovsk, focusing on creating a fire-sack to prevent successful exploitation until local reserves can be mustered.
4. Force Protection (IMMEDIATE - All C2 Nodes): Given the MDCOA of dual-decapitation, all forward and operational C2 nodes (Eastern Command and 5th Assault Brigade) must enforce maximum dispersion, redundancy, and electronic silence (EMCON) during the projected MLD initiation window (031700Z - 032100Z). Utilize mobile/redundant communications (VHF/UHF field assets) shielded from potential EMP/Kinetic effects.