Archived operational intelligence briefing
TIME: 2025-12-02 21:04Z SUBJECT: STEPNOHORSK MLD DELAYED PENDING DIPLOMATIC CONCLUSION. RF COERCION PEAKING. SUSTAINED HIGH ALERT REQUIRED.
A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain The Stepnohorsk Salient (Zaporizhzhia Axis) remains the focal point of RF operational effort. Critical terrain includes the confirmed RF staging area at Dobropilsky and the anticipated main penetration vector via Zelyony Gai.
B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations Low-light conditions persist, favoring limited RF mechanized maneuver and FPV UAS operations. UAF success at Orestopil (20:48Z) demonstrates that decentralized anti-armor defenses can successfully interdict RF movement in this environment.
C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures The predicted Main Land Drive (MLD) initiation at 2100Z has been delayed. This suggests RF tactical C2 is holding the 37th/291st MRRs in final assault positions, synchronized with the extended diplomatic maneuver.
| Factor | Assessment | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Stepnohorsk MLD Status | Delayed, High Alert (NLT Conclusion of Moscow Talks) | HIGH |
| Strategic Synchronization | Confirmed link between kinetic timing and diplomatic event conclusion | HIGH |
| Localized Defense Success | UAF 225th OSHP successful interdiction reported at Orestopil | MEDIUM |
A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action RF INTENTION is to force political concessions by maximizing the psychological and strategic impact of the MLD. The kinetic operation is now subservient to the diplomatic maneuver. The delay past the anticipated 2100Z trigger point confirms RF is exercising patient, centralized control to ensure maximal coercion.
B. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations
C. Logistics and Sustainment Status Sustainment Assessment Rating (SAR) score of 29.50 (CRITICAL) remains unchanged, confirming that RF logistics support for the large-scale Stepnohorsk assault remains fully active and prepared for immediate execution.
D. Command and Control Effectiveness RF Strategic C2 is judged HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The sustained synchronization of the 4+ hour Putin-Witkoff meeting (20:36Z, 20:56Z) with the standing kinetic assault force is a text-book example of coercive strategy execution. Tactical C2 is demonstrating discipline by holding the assault elements in staging areas.
A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness UAF forces, particularly the 5th Assault Brigade, remain on high alert. The successful anti-armor action reported by the 225th OSHP near Orestopil (20:48Z) confirms that localized defensive readiness and C-UAS application are effective in delaying or disrupting RF probing attacks.
B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks
C. Resource Requirements and Constraints The critical requirement for C-UAS and anti-armor munitions remains paramount. The threat to C2 nodes is amplified by the RF success against high-value technical personnel (Vyshhorod).
A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns RF IO is executing maximal psychological pressure. Pro-Kremlin channels (TASS, Colonelcassad) are amplifying the extraordinary duration of the Putin-Witkoff talks (now entering the 5th hour), generating massive anticipation for a consequential announcement tied directly to the Stepnohorsk threat. RF continues to utilize refugee narratives (Volchansk) to promote the idea of liberation and discredit UAF authority.
B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors Domestic morale is under extreme stress due to the prolonged diplomatic uncertainty coinciding with the imminent kinetic threat. UAF IO is attempting to mitigate this by shifting focus to positive domestic economic indicators (21:02Z), an insufficient counter-narrative to the existential threat.
C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments The ongoing, high-stakes diplomatic event in Moscow is the critical indicator. The extraordinary length of the meeting (4+ hours) suggests either protracted disagreement on key maximalist terms or a complex negotiation regarding synchronized de-escalation/military operations. The duration itself is the primary instrument of coercion.
The MLD commencement window is no longer fixed at 2100Z; it is now tethered to the diplomatic conclusion.
| COA | Description | Trigger/Timeline | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLCOA (Kinetic Escalation Coincides with Diplomatic Failure) | RF initiates the MLD at Stepnohorsk immediately following the collapse or non-compliance of the Moscow negotiations. The MLD will proceed as planned (mechanized penetration, UGV breach, KAB cover), timed precisely to maximize political shock and leverage failure of talks. | Conclusion of Putin-Witkoff dialogue (NLT 022200Z/030001Z) followed by high-level RF public statement (e.g., rejection of terms). | HIGH |
| MDCOA (C2 Decapitation during MLD Execution) | RF exploits the SHORAD vacuum to execute a long-range precision strike (Iskander/Kalibr) on the UAF 5th Assault Brigade HQs/C2 nodes at the moment of MLD initiation, regardless of the political outcome. This is designed to induce operational paralysis and accelerate the breakthrough. | Immediate detection of multiple high-speed, high-altitude inbound tracks concurrent with MLD launch. | HIGH |
| Alternate COA (ALCOA) (Limited Agreement/Temporary Pause) | Putin announces a temporary localized ceasefire or "goodwill pause" at Stepnohorsk in exchange for specific, high-visibility political concession (e.g., immediate recognition of new Russian status for Pokrovsk or partial sanctions relief). This is a tactical pause to reposition or re-cohere. | Immediate cessation of RF preparatory fires and a publicly broadcast announcement of limited diplomatic success following the conclusion of talks. | LOW |
| Priority | Gap Description | Collection Requirement (CR) |
|---|---|---|
| PRIORITY 1 (HUMINT/STRATINT) | Immediate and detailed understanding of the specific terms demanded by RF in the ongoing Moscow negotiations, particularly regarding territorial, military withdrawal, or sovereignty concessions. | CR-3 (Updated): Continuous, aggressive HUMINT tasking to US/NATO partner channels regarding content and anticipated public messaging from the Putin-Witkoff dialogue. Need specific demands to prepare counter-negotiation position. |
| PRIORITY 2 (TECHINT/HUMINT) | Confirmation of the alleged Vyshhorod HVT strike (FP-7/FP-9 designer). Assess the impact on UAF UAS R&D and identify any compromise of personnel/security protocols. | CR-4 (New): Immediate TECHINT assessment of R&D facility security status and confirmation of personnel loss via reliable UAF channels. |
| PRIORITY 3 (IMINT/SIGINT) | Confirmation of the current status (force composition, precise GPS locations) of the RF main assault columns (37th/291st MRRs) now that the 2100Z launch window has been missed. Are they refueling/rearming or holding static? | CR-1 (Active): Continuous tasking of all available ISR assets over Zelyony Gai and Stepnohorsk defense lines. Focus on acoustic/thermal signatures indicating engine activity or mass troop movement. |
The primary mission remains to deny RF a rapid, decisive kinetic success that can be leveraged immediately following the diplomatic conclusion.
Adjust Defensive Readiness (J3 – High Alert Maintenance)
C2 Protection and Survivability (J6/J3)
Sustained Kinetic Interdiction (J3 – Force Pacing)
Strategic Communication Countermeasure (NCA/J7)
We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.
Learn more in our Privacy Policy.