Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – CRITICAL ACTION WINDOW 2.0

TIME: 021305Z DEC 25 OPERATIONAL PHASE: KINETIC-DIPLOMATIC CLIMAX (CRITICAL INTENSITY) UPDATE: The predicted 1400Z synchronization point is now minutes away. The arrival of high-level US non-official delegates (Witkoff confirmed in Moscow) validates the RF diplomatic coercion strategy. Kinematic threats are escalating with the confirmed deployment of online-controlled loitering munitions (Guided Shaheds) specifically targeting UAF Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs), further jeopardizing the Stepnohorsk AD umbrella. The Information Environment is under severe stress from highly damaging diplomatic leaks and RF amplification of UAF self-inflicted IO wounds.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The operational environment remains challenging for UAF due to RF technological adaptation. The threat profile has shifted: UAF Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) operating in open areas are no longer safe from loitering munition targeting, making AD movement riskier and complicating concealment measures.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF: Units are struggling to cope with the simultaneous kinetic, political, and IO crises. Tactical adaptation (MFGs attempting to engage new drone threats) is evident but is being countered immediately by RF. Reserves must be assumed fixed or already engaged in the Stepnohorsk axis planning area.

RF: C2 synchronization across all domains (Political, IO, Kinetic) is confirmed to be maximal and effective, utilizing the 1400Z deadline as a fixed point for coercion.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (IMMEDIATE): Execute the Stepnohorsk MLD simultaneously with the presentation of a non-negotiable diplomatic ultimatum facilitated by high-profile US non-official presence (Witkoff) in Moscow (ETA 1400Z). The goal is to force a ceasefire on RF terms, validated by current kinetic success and compounded by UAF IO collapse.

CAPABILITY (C4ISR/TECHINT): RF has demonstrated the capability to deploy Guided Loitering Munitions (e.g., controlled Shahed variants) that provide real-time targeting updates, allowing them to effectively neutralize UAF mobile AD and interdiction forces. This capability directly enhances the likelihood of success for the Stepnohorsk armored assault. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

COA (IO/STRATEGIC): RF IO is focused on undermining Western political will. New vectors include:

1. Amplifying the unverified Politico report regarding US support for returning frozen RF assets.
2. Exploiting corruption allegations against former high-level EU diplomats (Mogherini, Sannino) to delegitimize Western financial support.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift to online-controlled loitering munitions targeting mobile AD/MFG units is the most critical tactical adaptation identified in the new intelligence window. This directly addresses the main UAF counter-UAS TTP and places immense pressure on the air defense capability around Zaporizhzhia.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Robust. The ability to deploy new, specialized drone variants (guided Shaheds) and sustain deep strikes on infrastructure confirms high technical and logistical sustainment capability.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly adaptive and effective. The rapid, synchronized response to the UAF AD TTP (MFGs) demonstrates effective real-time C4ISR integration. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is defensively fixed and psychologically strained. While the SBU achieved a critical counter-intelligence success (British agent exposed), this positive narrative is instantly weaponized by RF IO to sow distrust of foreign partners. The primary kinetic vulnerability is the growing difficulty of defending the Stepnohorsk axis against the integrated threat of armored assault and effective AD suppression by guided munitions.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed high-level diplomatic support via the Ireland summit (Zelenskiy/Martin).
• SBU success in neutralizing a foreign agent (although immediately subject to RF counter-IO).

Setbacks/Challenges:

1. AD Vulnerability: Confirmed successful targeting of UAF MFGs by guided loitering munitions, increasing kinetic vulnerability in the deep rear/staging areas.
2. Strategic Isolation Narrative: The convergence of the Moscow diplomatic track, the German FM statements, and the damaging Politico leak creates a strong, negative narrative of impending diplomatic abandonment.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate counter-TTPs must be developed and disseminated to MFGs and AD units regarding the threat of guided loitering munitions. This requires either technical solution (e.g., advanced EW or decoy systems) or immediate operational change (e.g., increased distance, hardened positions, or strict time-on-target limits).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is achieving strategic success by targeting the integrity and reliability of Kyiv's Western partners:

• EU Corruption: TASS and Colonelcassad are aggressively exploiting corruption claims against former EU diplomats (Mogherini, Sannino) to frame the EU as endemically corrupt and an unreliable ally.
• US Policy Subversion: The unverified Politico report regarding US support for returning frozen RF assets is highly leveraged to signal a shift in US strategic alignment, intended to psychologically paralyze the NCA.
• Refugee Coercion: Netherlands refugee center closures (TASS) are amplified to suggest eroding humanitarian support.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The confluence of tactical pressure (guided Shaheds causing PTSD reactions, 12:58:02Z) and strategic betrayal narratives (frozen assets, German concessions) is placing severe strain on domestic morale. The NCA's ability to maintain public trust following the SKELIA AI debacle is paramount and requires immediate, decisive action before the 1400Z deadline.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The presence of Witkoff in Moscow confirms the critical nature of the diplomatic dual-track. While the Ireland summit provides a counterpoint, the Moscow meeting has achieved the information dominance necessary to coerce Kyiv through kinetic-diplomatic linkage.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: INTEGRATED KINETIC-DIPLOMATIC BLITZKRIEG (021400Z DEC) (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) The Stepnohorsk MLD will launch, potentially with initial success due to pre-emptive AD suppression using guided Shaheds and KABs. Putin will present an ultimatum to the US delegates in Moscow, demanding a ceasefire based on military lines (Stepnohorsk penetration/Pokrovsk encirclement), using the IO crisis (SKELIA) and the perceived US/German policy shifts (frozen assets, concessions) to ensure the ultimatum cannot be easily refused.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: PINPOINT STRIKE ON ZAPORIZHZHIA COMMAND/LOGISTICS, PREPARED BY GUIDED MUNITIONS (Risk Level: CRITICAL/HIGH) RF capitalizes on the confirmed ability of guided loitering munitions to neutralize forward mobile AD. The initial guided Shahed waves suppress or destroy key MFGs, creating a vulnerable window for a coordinated missile/KAB strike against the 5th Assault Brigade FOB, primary logistical nodes, or the Zaporizhzhia C2 center, functionally paralyzing the defense against the Stepnohorsk MLD launch.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Force Protection (J-3/J-5)

1. Counter-UAS TTP Implementation (J-3): IMMEDIATE DISSEMINATION. Direct all Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) and SHORAD units to adopt "Shoot-and-Scoot/Decoy Protocol Alpha," minimizing time exposed at stationary launch points (NLT 3 minutes) and utilizing enhanced thermal and physical concealment for staging areas. Prioritize EW assets to flood the 4G/GPS/Data Link spectrum in the Zaporizhzhia AD zone (CRITICAL).
2. Stepnohorsk Reserve Defense (J-3): Hardened C2: Assume MDCOA is imminent. All C2 nodes and reserve staging areas (e.g., 5th Assault Brigade) must immediately transition to deeply buried or physically hardened positions. Increase air defense saturation (SHORAD) specifically for these reserve staging areas, accepting the calculated risk of leaving other targets less protected.
3. Pokrovsk Status (J-3): Authorize the immediate, organized withdrawal of the SKELIA Regiment (if not already encircled) to preservation of combat power. Utilize long-range fires to interdict RF pursuit elements only to cover the extraction; do not attempt to reinforce the lost IO narrative with tactical martyrdom.

7.2. Strategic Communications and Political Stability (NCA/J-7)

1. CRITICAL IO PREEMPTION (NCA/J-7): The President must deliver the planned transparent address NLT 021315Z DEC to pre-empt the 1400Z diplomatic ultimatum. This address must:
   • Publicly CONDEMN and investigate the SKELIA AI failure to restore domestic trust.
   • Explicitly Deny the Politico/Frozen Assets leak, framing it as RF disinformation designed to fracture the alliance.
   • Strongly Reiterate Red Lines: Publicly state that Ukraine will never concede territory based on referendums or diplomatic coercion synchronized with kinetic assaults.
2. Diplomatic Counter-Offensive (J-7): Direct diplomatic channels to coordinate a statement from the Ireland Summit participants and other allies immediately following the 1400Z talks, affirming the sanctions regime and rejecting the return of frozen assets under any scenario.

//END OF REPORT//