Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – MULTI-DOMAIN FUSION

TIME: 020435Z DEC 25 OPERATIONAL PHASE: CRITICAL KINETIC/C2 VULNERABILITY WINDOW (Stepnohorsk MLD) RF ground assault at Stepnohorsk is now synchronized with a high-tempo, multi-axis Information Warfare (IO) campaign claiming decisive victory in Donetsk and expansion in Kharkiv. The strategic objective is to achieve C2 paralysis and operational breakthrough NLT 020600Z DEC.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Stepnohorsk MLD (Zaporizhzhia Axis) remains the focus of decisive kinetic attention, following a massive IO shaping effort.

STRATEGIC GEOMETRY UPDATE (Pokrovsk/Kharkiv):

1. Pokrovsk (Donetsk): RF IO channels (Dva Mayora, TASS) are consolidating the narrative of capture, claiming the city is taken and the nearby garrison at Mirnograd (Dymytrov) is isolated and "doomed." This is designed to fix UAF operational reserves and depress NCA confidence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH on IO, MEDIUM on full BDA).
2. Vovchansk (Kharkiv): A new, unverified RF claim regarding the capture of Vovchansk (Kotsnews, 04:29Z) suggests RF is attempting to exploit the Pokrovsk-induced strategic distraction by inflating achievements on secondary axes. Verification is required, but the IO intent is clear: maximize UAF operational confusion.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist (Unchanged). Favorable for continued RF high-resolution UAV ISR and KAB targeting efforts in the Donetsk area (confirmed KAB launches at 04:09Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF posture is defensive-critical, heavily stressed by multi-domain pressure.

• RF Deep Strike Response: RF MoD claims 45 UAF UAVs intercepted overnight, including over Chechnya, Bryansk (14 UAVs), and Oryol Oblast (T&E facility fire confirmed at 04:33Z). This confirms UAF is successfully sustaining high-volume, long-range attrition operations, forcing RF to maintain a diluted AD posture across its territory.
• 5 OShB C2: C2 Dispersal compliance for the 5 OShB remains unconfirmed. The operational assessment of high C2 exposure/vulnerability stands. The MDCOA window is now integrated into the immediate MLCOA timeline.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (IMMEDIATE): Achieve kinetic culmination at Stepnohorsk by NLT 020600Z DEC while maximizing strategic confusion through coordinated IO saturation (Pokrovsk, Vovchansk claims). The goal is to force UAF command to prioritize the strategic shock (Donetsk) over the kinetic pressure (Zaporizhzhia).

CAPABILITY (C2 Integration): RF C2 has demonstrated high proficiency in seamlessly integrating strategic IO campaigns (claiming Pokrovsk, pushing US Envoy Whitkoff to Moscow) with tactical kinetic pressure (Stepnohorsk assault preparation). This indicates a highly centralized and responsive command structure supporting the main effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the rapid sequencing of IO claims (Pokrovsk followed by Vovchansk) to maintain operational momentum in the cognitive domain. Kinematically, the continued use of KABs in the Donetsk sector (confirmed 04:09Z) serves to pin UAF reserves near the claimed 'victorious' sector, preventing their redeployment South.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The UAF deep strike campaign targeting Russian T&E facilities (Oryol, Bryansk) successfully increases friction on RF sustainment. This mandates RF AD resource allocation away from the front and potentially constrains the fuel/mobility assets necessary for rapid exploitation of a breakthrough at Stepnohorsk. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, particularly in its ability to synchronize strategic IO with kinetic timing. The confirmation of Whitkoff's flight path towards Russia (04:14Z) validates the RF strategy of creating a fait accompli negotiating environment simultaneous with MLD pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are under peak cognitive pressure. The commitment to deep strikes (UAV campaign) remains robust, demonstrating UAF commitment to strategic attrition. However, readiness of the 5 OShB is critically reliant on the immediate implementation of C2 hardening protocols (GHOST). The political IO targeting Zelenskyy's office (Dmitruk claim, 04:32Z) directly stresses NCA stability, which impacts resource allocation decisions.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Immediate Strategic Setback: The requirement to absorb and counter the Pokrovsk and Vovchansk claims simultaneously forces NCA attention away from the Stepnohorsk MLD, creating an exploitable C2 vacuum. Operational Success: Successful UAF deep strikes against RF energy/military logistics (Oryol T&E facility fire confirmed).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The main constraint is Time—the window for hardening the 5 OShB C2 structure before the MDCOA strike is almost closed. Secondary constraint is SHORAD availability, still diluted by the deep-strike protection requirements of Dnipropetrovsk.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO synchronization is at a critical peak:

1. Military Triumph Axis: Pokrovsk capture (03:59Z) immediately reinforced by the unverified Vovchansk claim (04:29Z). Goal: Create a sense of cascading failure in Ukraine.
2. Internal Destabilization Axis: Claims of political paralysis within Kyiv (fear of taking Zelenskyy office positions, 04:32Z) designed to degrade UAF governance legitimacy.
3. Diplomatic/Western Fracture Axis: Whitkoff's flight towards Russia (04:14Z) and the Szijjártó statement (Europe preparing for 2030 war, 04:05Z) aim to frame the Moscow meeting as the viable peace track, isolate Kyiv, and reinforce RF domestic narratives of NATO aggression.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is facing a severe test due to the combined kinetic/IO shock. UAF counter-IO relies heavily on maximizing claimed RF casualties (1,110 personnel losses reported, 04:30Z), which may not be sufficient to offset the psychological impact of territorial losses claimed by RF. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The strategic diplomatic dual track is active. The Moscow mediation track, leveraged by the kinetic reality (Pokrovsk), is forcing UAF to rely heavily on swift counter-narratives from allies (e.g., Polish official Navrotskyi's statement against Russian deceit, 04:19Z) to maintain the legitimacy of the Ireland Summit track.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: INTEGRATED C2 STRIKE AND ACCELERATED MLD BREACH (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF forces have reached the kinetic inflection point. The MLCOA is now the execution of the full shaping effort: a high-yield precision strike against the most probable 5 OShB CPs (the previous MDCOA), synchronized with the peak ground assault at Stepnohorsk. RF believes the current strategic IO environment provides sufficient cover to justify the high-risk C2 strike. If the strike is successful, operational exploitation will follow rapidly (within 1 hour).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

The Most Dangerous Course of Action remains the successful execution of the C2 Decapitation Strike at Stepnohorsk, resulting in the temporary paralysis of UAF counter-attack capacity and opening a breach of $>3$ km operational depth, requiring commitment of strategic reserves. The risk level for this event is now categorized as IMMINENT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Force Protection (J-3/J-5)

1. C2 Hardening & Evasion (IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL): EXECUTE EMERGENCY SCRAMBLE PROTOCOL. Assume the main 5 OShB CP is compromised. All command staff must immediately relocate to pre-designated alternates, and primary CPs must be covered by active decoys and smoke screening, even if C2 dispersal was previously initiated.
2. Counter-Strike Preparation (URGENT): Reserve elements designated for potential counter-attack must be repositioned immediately to the operational rear of the Stepnohorsk MLD (3-5 km depth). Do not fix reserves toward the Pokrovsk IO threat. Prepare the reserves for rapid counter-attack against a narrow penetration (MLCOA exploitation) or, alternatively, for immediate force protection duty if the C2 strike occurs.
3. Counter-Reconnaissance Fire (IMMEDIATE): Authorize high-priority counter-battery fire against confirmed RF ISR UAV launch and landing sites supporting the Stepnohorsk axis. This is the last chance to degrade the MDCOA targeting solution.

7.2. Information Operations and Strategic Communications (J-7/NCA)

1. IO Counter-Punch (CRITICAL): The NCA must issue a unified, high-level statement NLT 020600Z DEC specifically addressing the IO saturation:
   • Acknowledge Strategic Challenge: (e.g., "The enemy seeks leverage through siege and propaganda.") Do not confirm full loss of Pokrovsk or Vovchansk.
   • Pivot Focus: Immediately redirect national attention to the ongoing UAF deep strike successes (Oryol, Bryansk T&E attacks confirmed). Frame the Stepnohorsk assault as a desperate attempt to distract from RF logistical failures.
   • Neutralize Political IO: Explicitly reject the claims of political paralysis and the internal demands for resignation as being "direct FSB hybrid warfare."
2. Diplomatic Clarity (URGENT): Use the Polish (Navrotskyi) counter-narrative to reinforce the message that the Moscow mediation track is a trap based on deceit. Reiterate that the Ireland Summit is the only legitimate platform for securing a just peace.