Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – MULTI-DOMAIN FUSION

TIME: 020404Z DEC 25 OPERATIONAL PHASE: CRITICAL DECISION WINDOW (Stepnohorsk Axis). RF ground assault is entering the kinetic peak closure window (NLT 020330Z DEC). The primary operational risks are IMPENDING RF C2 DECIPITATION STRIKE (MDCOA) and STRATEGIC SHOCK ABSORPTION following RF claims of Pokrovsk capture.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Stepnohorsk MLD (Zaporizhzhia Axis) remains the focus of decisive kinetic engagement. The previous window for tactical penetration assessment (020304Z - 020330Z DEC) has now concluded, demanding an immediate evaluation of UAF defensive resilience.

STRATEGIC GEOMETRY UPDATE (Pokrovsk): Russian Federation (RF) high-confidence IO channels (Kotsnews) declared the capture of Krasnoarmiisk (Pokrovsk) (03:59Z). While tactical BDA verification is pending, this IO synchronization with the Stepnohorsk assault suggests RF intends to achieve strategic shock and exploit UAF operational distraction.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist (Unchanged). Favorable for high-resolution UAV ISR and PGM/KAB targeting efforts against fixed and mobile assets, which directly supports the MDCOA planning by RF. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF posture is defensive-critical. The 5 OShB remains the main effort unit at risk. Active RF UAV groups are confirmed operating near the Dnipropetrovsk/Kharkiv border and North Sumy (03:57Z), confirming continued RF strategy to exhaust UAF strategic Air Defense (AD) assets far from the Stepnohorsk MLD.

CONTROL MEASURE STATUS: C2 Dispersal compliance for the 5 OShB remains unconfirmed following the elapsed 020245Z DEC deadline. Operational assumption remains C2 exposure/vulnerability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (IMMEDIATE): Exploit strategic momentum derived from the Pokrovsk claim to accelerate the operational timetable at Stepnohorsk. RF aims to achieve decisive operational depth (>1.5 km) and/or paralyze the 5 OShB via C2 decapitation NLT 020430Z DEC.

CAPABILITY (ADAPTATION): RF demonstrates synchronized multi-domain effort: kinetic pressure (Stepnohorsk), AD drain (Drone strikes Dnipro/Sumy), and decisive IO (Pokrovsk capture/Zelenskyy destabilization). This coordination increases the risk coefficient for UAF reserves and C2 stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation remains the highly effective counter-UGV TTPs confirmed in the previous reporting cycle. This adaptation directly reduces the friction RF mechanised forces face at the MLD. The kinetic focus remains low-level attrition combined with high-level precision strike preparation (MDCOA).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Sustainment for the Stepnohorsk breach force remains adequate for the immediate assault (next 4-6 hours). However, continued UAF deep strikes (Leningrad/UAV activity) mandate continued RF AD resource allocation away from the front, potentially constraining the rapid reinforcement of a breakthrough force.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrably effective in synchronizing strategic IO and tactical kinetic pressure. The rapid deployment of high-impact disinformation (Pokrovsk capture, Zelenskyy resignation) simultaneous with MLD pressure confirms a high level of C2 responsiveness and integration across domains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness of the 5 OShB is highly contingent on the immediate and disciplined implementation of the recommended tactical shift (away from UGV reliance, toward ATGM/mines). Personnel morale is expected to decline in the short term due to the IO impact of the Pokrovsk claim and internal political attacks.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Immediate Strategic Setback: The requirement to absorb and counter the strategic shock of the Pokrovsk capture claim will place a strain on the NCA's focus, potentially delaying critical decisions regarding reserve deployment or counter-attack execution at Stepnohorsk. Ongoing Tactical Setback: RF counter-UGV success diminishes the primary defensive asymmetric advantage of the 5 OShB.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The ongoing drone campaign targeting Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy continues to constrain the reallocation of SHORAD assets necessary to protect 5 OShB forward CPs from high-precision RF ISR/Strike assets.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations (IO) are now operating at a high tempo, focusing on a coordinated three-pronged attack (Confidence: HIGH):

1. Military Triumph: Declaring the capture of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiisk) to establish a "victorious" narrative for the winter campaign.
2. Internal Destabilization: Promoting political demands for President Zelenskyy's resignation (04:02Z), aiming to fracture domestic leadership and decision-making authority during a kinetic crisis.
3. Diplomatic Fracture: Pushing the narrative that RF and the US will bypass Europe on peace agreements (03:55Z), designed to weaken European resolve ahead of the Ireland summit.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The Pokrovsk claim will severely test public morale, particularly if UAF does not immediately provide a credible counter-narrative or BDA. RF IO is directly targeting the resilience of the political class. (D/S Belief: Information Warfare is the dominant factor, 0.528).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The kinetic reality at Stepnohorsk and the IO surrounding Pokrovsk will determine the leverage for both the RF (Moscow) and UAF (Ireland) diplomatic tracks. A successful RF breach at Stepnohorsk, coupled with the political IO, risks weakening the US/European negotiating stance.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: ACCELERATED MLD BREACH AND EXPLOITATION (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF forces, having achieved strategic IO superiority via the Pokrovsk claim, will accelerate kinetic pressure on the Stepnohorsk MLD, attempting to overwhelm UAF defensive shifts (UGV replacement) before they are fully effective. If a breakthrough is achieved, exploitation will focus on the immediate rear (1.5-3 km operational depth). The MDCOA preparation window remains active.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: EXECUTION OF PRECISION C2 STRIKE (HIGH YIELD) (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) The RF C2 strike remains highly probable. The window for this strike is tightening. Given the RF expenditure on UAV ISR/AD-drain operations, the MDCOA is viewed as the necessary kinetic culmination of the current shaping operation. Failure to confirm 5 OShB C2 dispersal makes this highly executable.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Force Protection (J-3/J-5)

1. C2 Hardening and Deception (IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL): The window for the MDCOA is closing. GHOST PROTOCOL EXECUTION IS NON-NEGOTIABLE. All 5 OShB CPs must immediately increase camouflage, maintain EMCON, and utilize active decoys/mobile EW systems to dilute RF targeting solutions.
2. Tactical Fire Shift (URGENT): Confirm the 5 OShB has ABANDONED PRIMARY RELIANCE ON UGV COUNTER-MOBILITY and is shifting all immediate defensive kinetic resources to:
   • Pre-sited ATGM teams with priority focus on high-ground choke points.
   • Expedient barrier/mine placement operations (non-UGV deployment).
3. Reserve Assessment (CRITICAL): J-3 must immediately assess the status and readiness of any UAF reserves previously designated for the Pokrovsk sector. Due to the confirmed RF claim/IO, these reserves must be re-tasked NLT 020500Z DEC to reinforce the operational rear of the Stepnohorsk axis or designated for deep counter-strike missions. Do not commit reserves into a denied area based on a potentially false RF operational boundary.

7.2. Information Operations and Strategic Communications (J-7/NCA)

1. Counter-Propaganda Protocol (CRITICAL): Immediately issue a coordinated statement addressing the Pokrovsk claim. Strategy must be: a) Concede GLOC failure and transition to decentralized defense; b) Refuse to confirm full city control by RF; c) Pivot the narrative immediately to RF brutality and governance failure (using previous reports on safety degradation). (Timeline: NLT 020600Z DEC).
2. Defuse Internal Crisis (URGENT): The NCA must issue a strong, unified response rejecting the internal political demands for presidential resignation. Frame the IO attack as evidence of RF desperation and hybrid warfare tactics aimed at fracturing Ukrainian unity during a critical kinetic phase.