Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – MULTI-DOMAIN FUSION

TIME: 020234Z DEC 25 OPERATIONAL PHASE: Decisive Engagement (Stepnohorsk Axis). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The operational situation remains centered on the confirmed, ongoing RF decisive ground engagement in the Southern Axis (Stepnohorsk MLD), currently within the projected kinetic peak window (020215Z - 020330Z DEC). The primary threat remains the synchronized application of ground assault forces following high-yield PGM/FAB strikes in the near-rear (Huliaipole). Multi-domain analysis confirms continued UAF deep-strike pressure (UAV alert in Lipetsk) and successful maritime deterrence (increased Black Sea shipping costs), which RF is attempting to counter via intensive 'normalization' propaganda (Mariupol reconstruction). The immediate operational priority is confirming 5 OShB C2 dispersal compliance and executing supporting fires against the Stepnohorsk ground assault.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Stepnohorsk MLD remains the kinetic Center of Gravity (CoG). The operational picture is unchanged from the 020215Z DEC assessment: RF forces are executing the ground phase of the assault, supported by shaping fires targeting UAF concentration areas (Huliaipole). The Strategic Deep Operations Zone remains active, evidenced by the recently cleared "Red Level" UAV threat in Lipetsk region (RF territory) at 020232Z DEC. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist. Favorable for high-altitude RF tactical aviation maneuvers and precision-guided munition (PGM) delivery. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are defensively committed at Stepnohorsk. CRITICAL CONTROL MEASURE: The status of C2 dispersal for the 5 OShB is paramount, as the critical compliance window (NLT 020230Z DEC) has now elapsed. Forces are in position to execute counter-mobility and direct fire engagement against the confirmed RF armored thrust.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (IMMEDIATE): Achieve a localized kinetic breach of the Stepnohorsk MLD through integrated air/ground assault, capitalizing on the psychological effect and materiel damage inflicted by the Huliaipole FAB strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) CAPABILITY: The proven capability to employ FABs against near-rear targets remains the defining capability threat. RF is demonstrating effective synchronization between tactical aviation, IO, and mechanized units.

J-2 JUDGMENT: RF tactical air assets are likely supporting the ground assault either through close air support (CAS) or by maintaining high-altitude orbits to prepare for the predicted MDCOA (Precision C2 decapitation) should the initial ground assault stall.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

No change in tactical adaptations in the Stepnohorsk AO since the previous report. RF continues to focus its strategic IO (e.g., showcasing reconstruction) to distract from the failure to suppress UAF deep operations (e.g., Lipetsk UAV threat).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Adequate for the decisive phase. No new changes noted.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE in synchronization and tactical execution, managing the kinetic decisive engagement while simultaneously executing deep-strike risk mitigation (Lipetsk UAV alert) and IO projection (Mariupol). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture is currently under maximum kinetic stress. Readiness depends entirely on the resilience of dispersed C2 nodes and the effectiveness of local SHORAD/EW protection against the aviation threat.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback (Kinetic): The Stepnohorsk MLD is currently engaged in decisive combat, which carries inherent attrition risk. Successes (Deep/Maritime):

1. Deep Operations Maintenance: The presence of a UAV threat in the Lipetsk region (350+ km deep) confirms UAF (likely GUR/SSO) continues to successfully execute deep strike operations, forcing RF resource commitment for homeland defense. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
2. Maritime Denial: Reported increase in Black Sea commercial shipping costs confirms the success of UAF maritime denial/interdiction strategy, generating significant economic pressure on maritime trade. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The AD resource strain is exacerbated by the requirement to cover potential C2 nodes against FAB attack while maintaining coverage against jet-powered Shaheds impacting rear cities. The operational necessity of securing deep logistics nodes (from FABs) risks exposing forward elements to non-PGM air threats.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF is employing a multi-layered information strategy:

1. Normalization (Mariupol): The release of high-quality video demonstrating internal reconstruction of the Mariupol Drama Theater is a key effort to project stability, control, and successful restoration of occupied territories, primarily aimed at a domestic RF audience. (DS Belief: 0.052 Logistical Shift/0.092 Propaganda).
2. Strategic Alignment: The announcement of the pending Russia-Saudi Arabia visa-free regime serves to undermine the Western narrative of RF isolation, supporting the 'Dual Track' diplomacy strategy identified previously. (DS Belief: 0.286 Diplomatic Initiative).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale must be proactively managed, linking the successful deep strikes (Lipetsk) and economic maritime pressure (Black Sea) to direct successes that support the grinding defense at Stepnohorsk.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

UAF must leverage the increased Black Sea shipping costs as proof of effective attrition warfare, bolstering calls for increased naval and AD support from NATO partners to sustain this pressure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: MLD BREACH EXPLOITATION (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF ground forces will continue probing for weaknesses at the Stepnohorsk MLD throughout the immediate kinetic window (now until 020330Z DEC). If a penetration is achieved, RF will commit second-echelon armored elements NLT 020430Z DEC to deepen the breach and establish a firm foothold for maneuver.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: EXECUTION OF C2 DECAPITATION (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) If the initial ground assault fails to achieve a decisive breakthrough by 020330Z DEC, RF tactical aviation will execute high-value precision strikes (FAB/PGM) against identified UAF C2 nodes, particularly targeting command/communication structures that failed to disperse rapidly. This shift would be confirmed by heightened RF ELINT/SIGINT activity.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Force Protection (J-3/J-5)

1. C2 Force Protection Confirmation (CRITICAL, 5 OShB): IMMEDIATELY Re-task J-3/J-6 liaison to confirm operational status of dispersed 5 OShB CPs NLT 020245Z DEC. If status remains unconfirmed, assume non-compliance and execute the GHOST advisory plan (High-Volume False Communications) to protect forces from the highly probable C2 targeting (MDCOA).
2. Fire Support Execution (IMMEDIATE): Confirm and execute the pre-allocated HIMARS/O-FAS strike missions targeting RF artillery/logistics nodes supporting the MLD breach. Execute NLT 020300Z DEC to degrade RF capacity during the current kinetic peak.
3. SHORAD Prioritization: Given the confirmed depth of RF air capability, prioritize mobile SHORAD assets (e.g., Gepard/Stinger teams) to provide point defense for verified, dispersed 5 OShB CPs, overriding static defense of rear logistical nodes if necessary.

7.2. Information Operations and Strategic Communications (J-7/NCA)

1. Leverage Maritime Success: Task J-7 to immediately amplify the report regarding increased Black Sea shipping costs. Frame this as a successful "Economic Blockade" strategy, emphasizing RF's inability to secure vital trade routes and supporting the narrative of ongoing success despite kinetic pressure in the East/South.
2. Counter-Normalization Narrative: Prepare a robust counter-narrative to the Mariupol reconstruction video, focusing on the destruction of the site and the displacement of the population before the renovation, framing the reconstruction as a cynical attempt to erase war crimes history.