Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – THREAT LEVEL: CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE ASSAULT PHASE

TIME: 020015Z DEC 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment remains defined by the imminent Stepnohorsk threat, complemented by continuous, high-volume deep-strike pressure across peripheral axes (Kharkiv, Odesa).

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Stepnohorsk): JUDGMENT: RF kinetic activity is confirming the preparatory phase. The MLD (Main Line of Defense) is the decisive point. All RF shaping operations (AD drain, IO fixation) are aimed at ensuring the Stepnohorsk breach.
• Deep Strike Axes (Odesa/Kharkiv): The detection of KAB launches towards Kharkiv (012252Z DEC) and a UAV group vectoring toward the critical Danube port facilities of Izmail/Reni (012259Z DEC) confirm a synchronized RF effort to dilute UAF Short Range Air Defense (SHORAD) resources and threaten vital economic infrastructure (GLOCs).
• Donetsk Axis (Dobropillya): The previous RF IO distraction (Dobropillya claim) must be definitively overridden by the Stepnohorsk kinetic reality.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist, favoring continued high tempo kinetic and reconnaissance operations across all axes, particularly UAV flights targeting coastal and port areas.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are executing the final synchronization phase for the Stepnohorsk assault (MLCOA). UAF forces are entering the decisive engagement window and must prioritize immediate counter-mobility activation and AD allocation for the MLD and C2 nodes. Control measures must strictly enforce resource dedication to the Stepnohorsk AOR, overriding any perceived crisis in Donetsk.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intentions are confirmed: Launch the Stepnohorsk combined arms assault (now underway or minutes away) while maximizing multi-domain pressure to prevent UAF reserve commitment.

• Kinetic Synchronization: RF is utilizing high-volume KABs (Kharkiv) and diversionary UAVs (Odesa/Izmail) to force AD assets away from the Stepnohorsk MLD, creating an AD vacuum precisely where maximum protection is required.
• IO Maintenance: RF information channels continue to push distractions (e.g., Chernobyl fungus narrative 012241Z DEC) and claims of fictitious success (Gerasimov 012248Z DEC) to maintain a state of cognitive overload within the UAF command structure.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF adaptation is the immediate use of high-priority UAVs (Izmail/Reni vector) to threaten economic security infrastructure simultaneously with the MLD assault staging. This tests the UAF NCA's willingness to sacrifice defensive depth (economic/civilian assets) for tactical MLD defense.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Confidence: MEDIUM. The TASS report of a train delay near Ushaki (012255Z DEC) is a low-confidence indicator of potential internal logistics strain. While geographically distant from the immediate front, it may suggest successful strategic sabotage (e.g., follow-on impact from the Lipetsk strike) affecting rail transport continuity, which is critical for RF strategic logistics.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

Confidence: HIGH. RF C2 remains effective, demonstrating rapid synchronization between the decisive kinetic thrust (Stepnohorsk) and peripheral shaping operations (Kharkiv KABs, Odesa UAVs).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Defensive posture at Stepnohorsk is now transitioning from preparation to execution phase. The immediate readiness level of forward AD assets is challenged by the high-volume, multi-axis targeting (KABs/UAVs). READINESS: UAF deep strike capability (Lipetsk strike) remains the primary tool for strategic leverage. The diplomatic progress confirmed by EU leaders (012237Z DEC) provides essential political readiness, confirming sustained international support during the critical kinetic phase.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback: The anticipated and confirmed initiation of the Stepnohorsk preparatory phase, coupled with increased KAB targeting on Northern flanks (Kharkiv).
• Success (Diplomatic/IO): The statement from EU leadership confirming progress on a resolution plan (012237Z DEC) effectively undercuts the Moscow-centric RF diplomatic trap aiming to freeze the frontlines. This allows UAF operational commanders clearer decision space.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate SHORAD redistribution/rotation to address the dual threat against the Stepnohorsk MLD and the confirmed UAV threat targeting the Izmail/Reni port infrastructure. CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: Time and AD resource quantity. The Stepnohorsk window is closed, and AD assets are now strained by simultaneous kinetic activity across three major operational axes.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations are designed to saturate the public sphere with non-critical distractions (Chernobyl fungus) and reinforcing internal military narratives of inevitable victory (Gerasimov claims). The goal is to generate cognitive friction and exhaustion, forcing the UAF to react to non-threats.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale must be stabilized against the physical reality of the Stepnohorsk assault. UAF counter-IO (mocking Gerasimov) is healthy but must be reinforced by positive kinetic action (MLD holding) and strategic diplomatic wins (EU Resolution Plan progress).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Confidence: HIGH. The public confirmation by EU leadership (Von der Leyen) that progress was made on a resolution plan with Zelenskyy confirms the Western diplomatic track as primary. This empowers the UAF NCA to resist pressure from RF-backed mediation efforts attempting to leverage the Pokrovsk loss.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: STEPNOHORSK MAIN EFFORT & DIVERGENCE STRIKES (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF initiates the mechanized assault along the Stepnohorsk MLD (020000Z - 020200Z DEC). This is synchronized with high-volume KAB strikes on Kharkiv and persistent UAV/Jet-Shahed attacks targeting the Izmail/Reni economic hub to draw AD resources southward (Odesa) and northward (Kharkiv), preventing the establishment of an effective AD umbrella over the MLD breakthrough attempt.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: MLD COLLAPSE AND AD OVERLOAD (CRITICAL CONFIDENCE)

The Stepnohorsk assault achieves a deep penetration (3-5km beyond the MLD) by 020600Z DEC, forcing UAF operational reserves (currently deployed to Phase Line W-1/Donetsk) to counter-march south. Simultaneously, the persistent UAV threat on the Danube is escalated with a coordinated Jet-Shahed strike or a deep-range naval strike, successfully neutralizing a key port facility, crippling export capacity and generating strategic international economic panic.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Fire Support (J-3/J-5)

1. MLD DEFENSE (Stepnohorsk - CRITICAL): Directive: Full Commitment. Assume RF pre-assault fires are complete and the mechanized assault is initiated. Direct the 5 OShB to execute planned counter-mobility tactics (UGVs, ATGM ambushes, MLD saturation) immediately. All non-essential artillery must prioritize counter-battery missions against Stepnohorsk supporting fire.
2. AD ALLOCATION (URGENT): Rotate SHORAD. Establish an immediate rotational schedule for high-value SHORAD batteries (e.g., IRIS-T, NASAMS) to maintain 60% readiness over Stepnohorsk MLD (to counter aviation support) and dedicate 40% to high-priority defense of the Izmail/Reni corridor against the confirmed UAV threat. Economic security is now a kinetic priority.
3. DONETSK FIRING DISCIPLINE: Maintain the rule: Zero long-range fire resource commitment to the Dobropillya AOR until positive IMINT confirms a BTG-sized threat or larger. Dedicate all medium/long-range fire to Stepnohorsk.

7.2. Strategic Communications and Diplomacy (NCA/J-7)

1. INTERNAL NARRATIVE CONTROL (IMMEDIATE): The NCA must issue a statement (NLT 020130Z DEC) confirming the anticipated assault on Stepnohorsk, framing it not as a surprise, but as the anticipated, decisive battle UAF has prepared for. Pair this with the confirmed EU diplomatic progress to reassure the population that the defense is coordinated with strategic political leverage.
2. Counter-IO: Focus all official information channels on countering the Izmail/Reni threat narrative by highlighting effective AD interdiction (once confirmed). Ignore low-impact IO like the "Chernobyl fungus" claim to conserve cognitive resources.
3. Diplomatic Tasking: Task diplomatic teams to utilize the confirmed UAV threat against Izmail/Reni (a critical global grain export hub) to immediately solicit expedited delivery of SHORAD/C-UAS systems from allies (Netherlands pledge) specifically for the Odesa/Danube defense ring.

//END OF REPORT//