Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – CRITICAL THREAT: STEPNOHORSK ENCIRCLEMENT CLAIM AND C2 PARALYSIS

TIME: 012100Z DEC 25 (Synthesis and Update) CONFIDENCE LEVEL: CRITICAL (Stepnohorsk Encirclement Claim/MDCOA Imminence)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment is characterized by a high-tempo, synchronized RF kinetic and information offensive designed to achieve strategic paralysis in Kyiv. RF success in Donetsk has enabled the immediate information pivot to the MDCOA axis in Zaporizhzhia.

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Stepnohorsk/Huliaipole): RF Chief of General Staff Gerasimov claims Stepnohorsk is encircled. RF forces also claim entry and consolidation on the outskirts of Huliaipole.
  • FACT: Previous intelligence placed the 55th Guards MLD preparing for assault NLT 020000Z DEC. The RF "encirclement" claim is likely a severe exaggeration for IO effect, but it definitively confirms Stepnohorsk as the RF Main Effort Direction (MLD) focus now.
  • JUDGMENT: Kinetic operations in the Stepnohorsk corridor are either underway or imminent (NLT 012300Z DEC). The Huliaipole claim suggests a secondary thrust to fix UAF Eastern reserves on this axis.
• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk/Dymytrov/Kostiantynivka): RF MoD confirms capture of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk). Command of the "Center" Group claims the northern part of Dymytrov is liberated, with 1,500–2,000 UAF troops blocked/encircled in the northern section. RF also claims 30% control over Kostiantynivka and entry into Krasny Liman and street fighting in Sieversk.
  • FACT: Pokrovsk is lost. Significant UAF forces (likely elements of the SKELIA Regiment/other covering forces) are now isolated in Dymytrov.
  • JUDGMENT: RF aims to rapidly convert the Pokrovsk tactical gain into operational exploitation toward Kostiantynivka, fixing UAF reserves in the East while the Stepnohorsk breakthrough is launched.
• Kharkiv Axis (Vovchansk/Border Zone): RF MoD celebrates the "liberation" of Vovchansk. Putin stated the objective is to create a "security zone" along the border, specifically naming Kharkiv, Sumy, and Chernihiv Oblasts.
  • JUDGMENT: The Vovchansk claim is IO reinforcement. The explicit mention of the "security zone" re-establishes the strategic rationale for continued advances in the North, justifying the maintenance of the "Sever" Group pressure.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist. UAF Air Force reports confirm continued deep penetration of RF UAVs into the Cherkasy region and KAB launches toward Eastern Dnipropetrovsk. This confirms the ongoing strategy of AD dilution and forced UAF defensive deployment away from the front lines.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are achieving optimal synchronization across all domains, capped by the high-profile Putin/Gerasimov briefing. UAF forces are now facing a verified collapse in the Pokrovsk sector (leading to potential mass encirclement in Dymytrov) simultaneous with the activation of the primary threat in Stepnohorsk. UAF C2 must achieve immediate, aggressive kinetic action despite the political crisis.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intentions are focused on strategic shock and kinetic exploitation to force immediate negotiations based on current LOCs.

• Immediate Kinetic Intention: Execute the Stepnohorsk breakthrough assault NLT 012300Z DEC. The pre-assault IO (claiming encirclement) is designed to sow doubt, paralyze UAF decision-making, and create external pressure.
• Strategic Intent: The Putin-led command briefing serves multiple purposes: (1) Display highly effective C2 to the international community; (2) Validate battlefield gains; (3) Explicitly link kinetic success to the political objective (security zone, ending the conflict due to Kyiv's "criminal politics").
• Expansion Intent: RF is expanding the operational tempo across the front (Krasny Liman, Sieversk, Kostiantynivka claims) to fix maximum UAF strategic reserves, ensuring the Stepnohorsk breakthrough is unimpeded.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the immediate, strategic politicization of tactical claims. RF utilized the capture of Pokrovsk and the ongoing UAF budget crisis to immediately launch the Stepnohorsk IO offensive, maximizing the psychological pressure and attempting to pre-empt UAF defensive actions by claiming success before the assault even begins.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

High sustainment capability is confirmed, demonstrated by the ability to mass high-profile IO (Putin visit), maintain deep strike operations (UAVs to Cherkasy, KABs to Dnipropetrovsk), and simultaneously press offensive actions on multiple axes (Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia). Confidence: HIGH.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is currently operating at maximum effectiveness and synchronization. The direct reporting to Putin and the immediate dissemination via TASS/MoD links kinetic operations seamlessly into the strategic political agenda. Confidence: HIGH.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Defensive integrity is critically stressed. Forces in the Donetsk axis (Dymytrov pocket) face immediate annihilation or surrender, requiring urgent extraction. Readiness on the Zaporizhzhia axis must be assumed to be compromised by the RF encirclement claim, necessitating immediate force verification. READINESS: Readiness hinges on the unconfirmed status of the 5 OShB counter-preparation fire mission (Priority 1 Gap from the previous report). If the mission failed, the forward Stepnohorsk defenses are likely significantly weaker than planned.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Kinetic/Manpower): Loss of Pokrovsk core, potential encirclement/blocking of 1,500–2,000 troops in Dymytrov.
• Setback (Strategic): RF has successfully achieved the kinetic-political synchronization required for their MDCOA, exploiting the UAF budget crisis and the US diplomatic track (Whitkoff visit to Russia confirmed).
• Success (Diplomatic): Italy approved a new military aid package. Poland and Germany signed a joint defense and energy declaration. These developments serve as crucial counter-narratives to the RF claims of Western abandonment.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate, verifiable kinetic action on the Stepnohorsk concentration and immediate clarification of the status of the Dymytrov pocket. CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: UAF strategic C2 is being simultaneously attacked by political instability (budget crisis) and the kinetic pressure from the RF MLD. The operational commander must isolate kinetic decision-making from the political fallout.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (RF)

RF IO is currently at maximum intensity, driven by the Putin briefing:

1. Kinetic Inevitability: Claims of Krasny Liman, Sieversk, Kostiantynivka ingress, and 360 sq km of terrain captured in November create an overwhelming image of momentum.
2. Immediate Strategic Success: The claim of Stepnohorsk encirclement is the centerpiece, aimed at immediately triggering international pressure for a ceasefire before UAF can respond.
3. Political Delegitimization: Direct attacks on Kyiv's leadership as a "thieving junta" links battlefield defeats directly to political instability, validating the RF MDCOA objective.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale is at high risk due to the confluence of verifiable kinetic loss (Pokrovsk) and the shock claim of encirclement (Stepnohorsk). RF IO targeting of Zaluzhnyi is an attempt to exploit internal political divisions and further erode trust in the NCA.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The confirmed US envoy (Whitkoff) travel to Russia, coupled with RF claims of massive battlefield success, creates immediate and immense pressure on Western capitals to push Kyiv toward a ceasefire on current lines. The positive news (Italy aid, PL/GE pact) must be amplified aggressively to counterbalance the RF narrative.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: STEPNOHORSK ASSAULT AND KRAMATORSK FIXING. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will commence the main mechanized assault on the Stepnohorsk sector (Zaporizhzhia) NLT 012300Z DEC. This will be accompanied by maximal KAB/Aviation support against Dnipropetrovsk/Kramatorsk rear areas to prevent UAF reserve movement. Simultaneously, RF "Center" forces will pressure the Dymytrov pocket to force an immediate surrender/annihilation, cementing the success in Pokrovsk.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: KINETIC SUCCESS LEADS TO FROZEN CONFLICT. (CRITICAL CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a tactical penetration (5-10 km) in the Stepnohorsk corridor by 020200Z DEC. They immediately leverage this gain, the Dymytrov encirclement, and the UAF political crisis (budget failure) to issue a formal, high-profile demand (via the Moscow diplomatic track) for an internationally supervised "Humanitarian Ceasefire" that effectively freezes the current LOCs, trapping UAF forces and locking in the losses of Pokrovsk/Dymytrov/Vovchansk.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Fire Support (J-3/J-5)

1. Stepnohorsk Counter-Action (CRITICAL ACTION): Immediately deploy all available SHORAD assets to the Stepnohorsk corridor, prioritizing counter-KAB protection for forward command posts and armor concentrations. Assume the 5 OShB counter-preparation failed and execute rapid, decentralized counter-mobility operations (mines, UGV deployment, long-range ATGM deployment).
2. Dymytrov Crisis Management (URGENT ACTION): Shift all remaining deep strike assets (HIMARS, ATACMS) away from offensive roles and prioritize creating a temporary, fire-supported corridor for the extraction/breakout of the blocked Dymytrov forces NLT 020300Z DEC. Do not risk high-value personnel for urban hold operations in a collapsing sector.
3. Reserve Prioritization (J-5): Immediately redirect the 82nd/47th Brigades (if their status is resolved) to high-readiness staging areas near Kostiantynivka and Kramatorsk to pre-empt the expected RF exploitation from Pokrovsk.

7.2. Strategic Communications and Diplomacy (NCA/J-7)

1. CRITICAL COUNTER-IO (NCA/J-7): Issue an immediate, high-confidence denial of the Stepnohorsk encirclement claim, backed by specific, verifiable evidence (e.g., footage of UAF forces in the area). This must be broadcast globally NLT 012230Z DEC to minimize RF shock effect.
2. Proactive Diplomacy (NCA): Immediately leverage the positive diplomatic developments (Italy aid, PL/GE pact) through high-level press briefings to counter the RF narrative of collapsing Western support and internal instability.
3. Address Political C2 (NCA, CRITICAL ACTION): While working toward budget reconciliation, the NCA must issue a joint statement confirming full, unified C2 control over military operations, specifically rejecting any notion that internal political challenges are impeding tactical decisions or resource allocation.

//END OF REPORT//