Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 301600Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: STEPNOHORSK CULMINATION PHASE // UAF AD TECHNOLOGY LEAP // RF STRATEGIC COGNITIVE PRESSURE PEAK

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE)

The operational environment remains defined by the culmination of RF kinetic effort at Stepnohorsk (Zaporizhzhia sector) coinciding with a peak in multi-domain cognitive shock operations. The immediate strategic context has shifted due to confirmed UAF technological advancements in air defense and severe diplomatic pressure narratives targeting the National Command Authority (NCA).

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Stepnohorsk - Decisive Point): Heavy fighting persists. UAF 3rd Assault Brigade maintains blocking positions against confirmed elements of RF Vostok Group (including 37th GMRB). RF efforts aim to achieve an operational breakthrough, leveraging previous UAF 33 OShP retreat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Zaporizhzhia/Polohy Axis (Huliaipole): RF Military Information Channels (MICs) claim significant advances, asserting control over Dobropillya and approaching Varvarivka/Pryluky. The stated RF objective is securing territory East of the Haychur River. This is currently assessed as an RF IO attempt to confirm forward movement and mask the primary breach attempt at Stepnohorsk. UAF ground truth verification is required. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Donetsk Axis (Krasny Lyman): RF MICs claim proximity ("We are close"). This indicates active engagement or preparation for an assault designed to fix UAF northern reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Kharkiv Axis (Vovchans'k): Confirmed continued fighting around factory areas ("Заводы 2-е"). The situation remains a costly fixation battle for both sides. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Sub-freezing conditions persist. Thermal denial strikes (targeting heating networks) continue to degrade civilian resilience and strain UAF rear area stabilization resources. Low-level UAV operations (e.g., Mykolaiv, East Zaporizhzhia) are favored by low-wind, cold-air stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• Ground Forces: UAF 3 ABde holding critical line at Stepnohorsk. Strategic reserves remain stationary (pending NCA resolution).
• Air Defense (AD): UAF AD successfully neutralized 104 targets (83.8% kill ratio) during the massed strike.
• New Adversary Activity: UAV activity confirmed in Mykolaiv region (near Kulbakino) and East of Zaporizhzhia (during air raid alert). This confirms persistent low-level kinetic threat despite the high overall AD kill rate. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent remains achieving the Stepnohorsk operational breach and forcing UAF political paralysis.

• New Technological Counter: The RF Drone Systems Troops (BPS) and their A2A UAVs ("Geran-fighters") remain a critical threat intended to establish localized tactical air superiority over the decisive axis.
• Special Operations: RF state media is highlighting operations by the "Akhmat" Spetsnaz, specifically the "Aida" detachment, suggesting intent to apply high-value, highly publicized SOF operations to pressure UAF C2 or disrupt rear areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Hybrid War Escalation: RF continues to treat UAF deep strikes (e.g., Novorossiysk CPC terminal) as acts of terrorism, utilizing state media (TASS/Zakharova) to delegitimize UAF actions and reinforce domestic mobilization narratives.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the immediate and aggressive use of Information Operations (IO) to exploit perceived divisions or external pressure against the NCA (Section 4.1). Tactically, RF is confirming elements of the new BPS doctrine in combat, utilizing UAVs for reconnaissance and low-altitude persistence (Mykolaiv/Zaporizhzhia reports).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics resilience remains a concern. While deep strikes (CPC) have been initiated, the confirmed activation of alternative Kazakh rail transshipment hubs (per previous report) continues to sustain Vostok Group's high-tempo assault forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF strategic C2 is highly effective in synchronizing kinetic strikes with sophisticated IO campaigns, confirming centralized control over the Hybrid Shock strategy. Tactical C2 for Vostok Group appears robust enough to manage the aggressive ground assault at Stepnohorsk and simultaneously publish wide-ranging, optimistic MIC claims (Huliaipole/Lyman).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Technological Readiness (CRITICAL SUCCESS): UAF forces successfully used Ukrainian-produced Sting interceptor drones to shoot down reactive Shahed (jet) UAVs for the first time. This capability is a significant technological leap, counteracting the primary RF long-range strike method and providing a high-value propaganda counter-narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• EW Capability: UAF 47th Mechanized Brigade claims 373 FPV drones downed in November, confirming high tactical effectiveness of localized EW/C-UAS efforts despite the overall A2A threat.
• Deep ISR/SOF: GUR operation near Berdiansk confirms continued UAF ability to conduct sophisticated reconnaissance and liquidation missions in deep RF-occupied territory, disrupting local RF logistics and control measures (e.g., 'Kadyrovites' illegal business). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Tactical Successes: Sting drone intercepts, 47th Brigade EW performance, GUR Berdiansk operation.
• Strategic Setbacks: The failure of the NCA to resolve the strategic reserve commitment and the public friction caused by the previous high-ranking official's 'freeze' statement (per previous report) continues to undermine strategic stability.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The most critical constraint is the NCA decision timeline regarding the strategic reserve deployment to Stepnohorsk (NLT 301400Z, now overdue). Resource requirements remain urgent allocation of EW assets to the 3 ABde sector to counter RF A2A/EW efforts.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO has reached a critical peak, directly targeting NCA unity and international support:

1. Peace Pressure Narrative: Multiple high-visibility channels (including pro-Ukrainian channels amplifying Western reports) are pushing the narrative that the US will exert strong pressure on President Zelensky next week for a war cessation agreement. This directly supports the MDCOA by suggesting UAF strategic retreat is inevitable and freezing operational decisions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
2. Military Disintegration: RF MICs disseminate disinformation regarding the purported death of Col. Kovalyov at the hands of his own troops, an attempt to sow discord and undermine unit cohesion.
3. Allied Fissures: RF state media promotes narratives of European geopolitical weakness against the US/Trump and amplifies images of Poland displaying maps of Ukraine without Crimea, aiming to fracture international coalition support.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is subjected to high stress due to the kinetic pressure and the perceived NCA decision paralysis. The technological success of the Sting interceptors and the Norway defense agreement are vital morale boosters that must be immediately and effectively broadcasted to counter the strategic narrative friction. Recruiting efforts (e.g., DSHV center anniversary) signal institutional resilience.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The confirmed strategic agreement with Norway for joint drone production is a cornerstone for future technological sustainment. However, the diplomatic context is immediately complicated by the Washington Post claims of impending US pressure, which risks providing RF leverage in international forums.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

The situation at Stepnohorsk has entered a critically fragile phase, amplified by external political pressure. The failure to commit strategic reserves by the critical deadline (301400Z) increases the risk of MLCOA success and MDCOA activation.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Operational Breakthrough into UAF Rear Areas (301600Z - 302000Z) (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF Vostok Group will exploit the now-expired critical window for UAF reserve commitment. Utilizing confirmed tactical fixation at Pokrovsk and IO narratives of success in Huliaipole to deceive UAF C2, RF motorized rifle battalions (37th GMRB) will apply maximum kinetic pressure to breach the thinning UAF defensive line south of Stepnohorsk, pushing to secure the T0408 highway access point. RF BPS (A2A UAVs) will maintain ISR denial to prevent UAF fire correction.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: Strategic Operational Rout Enabled by Political Paralysis (301600Z - 302400Z) (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF successfully exploits the amplified narrative of US pressure for a peace deal, leading to a complete freeze in NCA strategic decision-making regarding reserve deployment. Concurrently, a localized C2 failure (caused by RF EW/A2A action) at Stepnohorsk results in the disintegration of UAF 3 ABde's defense. RF units exploit this rout rapidly toward high-value infrastructure or C2 nodes, amplified by high-tempo RF IO confirming the political leadership's fractured state, leading to a widespread confidence collapse in the UAF strategic rear.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations focus on immediate operational risk mitigation at Stepnohorsk and neutralizing the synchronous strategic cognitive attack.

1. OPERATIONAL RISK MITIGATION (J3/C-in-C):

   • ACTION (CATASTROPHIC URGENCY): Immediately release and confirm the deployment of strategic reserves towards the Stepnohorsk axis. This action must be visible and rapid to prevent the MLCOA from succeeding and to neutralize the MDCOA precondition.
   • RATIONALE: The failure to act by the 301400Z deadline has created an unacceptable risk of operational rupture at the decisive point.

2. STRATEGIC NARRATIVE COUNTER-BLOW (NCA/J7):

   • ACTION (CATASTROPHIC URGENCY): The NCA must issue a robust, unified, and highly publicized statement rejecting external pressure for unfavorable negotiations and confirming the national objective of total liberation, directly addressing and dismissing the Washington Post claims as enemy-amplified distraction.
   • RATIONALE: This counters the primary cognitive domain threat that aims to paralyze the NCA during the kinetic crisis.

3. TECHNOLOGICAL EXPLOITATION AND FORCE PROTECTION (J6/J2):

   • ACTION (CRITICAL): Simultaneously launch two focused IO campaigns: 1) Highlighting the strategic impact of the Sting Interceptor success against jet UAVs. 2) Promoting the long-term sustainability guaranteed by the Norway joint drone production deal.
   • RATIONALE: Capitalizes on UAF technological superiority to restore domestic confidence and reaffirm international backing.

4. DEEP STRIKE LOGISTICS INTERDICTION (J3/SOF):

   • ACTION (URGENT): Re-prioritize deep strike targeting packages (UAV/SOF) against the alternative Kazakh-RF rail transshipment hubs (per previous report CR P2.0) to degrade Vostok Group's ability to maintain high-tempo assault operations beyond 48 hours.
   • RATIONALE: Must disrupt the logistical pipeline that sustains the current RF kinetic surge.

//END OF REPORT//