Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - URGENT ACTION REQUIRED

DTG: 292045Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: Escalated Kinetic Threat to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast Coincident with Critical RF Diplomatic IO Campaign // Confirmed RF Claim of Dachnoye (Dnipropetrovsk) Entry // High-Confidence Targeting of US/UA Delegation

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE)

The operational environment is characterized by a high-risk synchronization between ground/aerial kinetic action in the Dnipropetrovsk rear area and a decisive Russian Federation (RF) Information Operation (IO) campaign designed to neutralize the Ukrainian diplomatic mission in the United States. The RF claim of entering Dachnoye (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast) has significantly elevated the strategic risk profile in the central rear.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Dachnoye, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (CRITICAL CAI - NEW): RF Zvezda News (Colonelcassad) claims entry into Dachnoye, asserting it is the first settlement "liberated" in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (292003Z). This location, if confirmed, represents a critical operational penetration, likely originating from the Zaporizhzhia axis, aligning with the confirmed redirection of RF UAV groups towards Dnipropetrovsk. (INTELLIGENCE GAP: Immediate Verification Required)
• Stepnohorsk/Vremyevsky Salient (CRITICAL CAI - CONTINUING): The tactical vulnerability remains extreme due to lifted fog/mist conditions. UAF 3rd Assault Brigade continues establishing blocking positions. RF Vostok Group is anticipated to initiate armored action NLT 300600Z.
• Siversk Axis: RF TOS-2 threat persists; acquisition remains a top kinetic priority.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• FACT: Visibility is currently high due to the dissipation of low cloud cover and fog. Kinetic action, especially long-range fire and ISR, is highly effective.
• IMPACT: Favorable conditions for RF kinetic exploitation at Stepnohorsk and for effective target acquisition by UAV groups en route to Dnipropetrovsk.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF forces are postured for immediate, synchronized exploitation across multiple domains. IO elements are focused on defining the US/UA meeting before formal talks commence. Kinetic forces are positioned for assault at Stepnohorsk and strike preparation in Dnipropetrovsk.
• UAF: UAF forces are defensively committed at Stepnohorsk and are actively engaged in widespread fighting across the Eastern and Southern fronts (GenStaff 2000Z). The National Command Authority (NCA) is currently highly exposed to RF IO targeting.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Intentions (Kinetic): RF intent is to generate strategic chaos by coupling the Dachnoye claim (whether tactical reality or fabrication) with UAV saturation strikes against the Dnipropetrovsk logistics hub. This forces UAF to rapidly commit mobile AD and strategic reserves away from the Stepnohorsk main effort.
  • Actionability: The Dachnoye claim must be investigated immediately as a potential deep operational breach.
• Intentions (Information - CRITICAL PRIORITY): RF intent is confirmed to destroy the credibility and mandate of the US/UA delegation before their meeting in Florida.
  • FACT: The US delegation includes influential figures (Rubio, Whitkoff, Kushner) linked to the Trump orbit (291934Z).
  • JUDGMENT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF IO is using the confirmed attendance of these individuals to promote the "Forced Peace/Capitulation" narrative, suggesting that the US is actively imposing a peace scenario similar to the Israel-Hamas ceasefire model (TSAPLIYENKO, 291948Z).
• Capability (C2 Denial): RF IO reports (Colonelcassad/Rubicon Center) confirming systematic destruction of UAF communications equipment over 2025 demonstrate the technical capacity and intent to execute localized C2 denial events.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The immediate deployment of a propaganda piece claiming entry into a key rear oblast (Dnipropetrovsk) directly upon the confirmation of the US/UA delegation meeting details demonstrates near-instantaneous, high-level C2 synchronization between the RF Military and the IO apparatus. This synchronization is a significant operational threat.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remains resilient due to the established alternative Kazakh rail/road corridors. Stabilization of Vostok Group POL stocks is anticipated within 48 hours.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 effectiveness across the hybrid domain is assessed as HIGH. The rapid, tailored response to the specific details of the US/UA meeting (location, personnel) confirms a mature intelligence-to-IO pipeline.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is heavily reactive, simultaneously dealing with a ground crisis (Stepnohorsk), a major UAV threat to the rear (Dnipropetrovsk), and a critical strategic IO attack. Readiness remains high at the tactical level (GenStaff reports intense fighting), but strategic C2 is under acute pressure from communications denial efforts and political anxiety.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Operational/Cognitive): The RF claim regarding Dachnoye, even if false, forces a costly diversion of limited ISR and reserve confirmation resources.
• Setback (Strategic): RF IO has successfully framed the upcoming US/UA meeting as a surrender negotiation, rather than a mission for further support, before the delegation arrives.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Immediate Ground Verification: Requirement for rapid IMINT/Reconnaissance assets (ISR drones, SOF patrols) to verify the Dachnoye claim without diverting critical forces from Stepnohorsk.
2. Information Defense: Requirement for an immediate, unified counter-narrative tailored to rebut the specific influence of the Trump-aligned individuals and the "peace brokerage" model.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

The environment is saturated by RF IO, aiming to achieve strategic paralysis in Kyiv through cognitive shock.

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. "Forced Peace" Narrative (PRIMARY THREAT): RF and pro-RF channels are actively pushing the narrative that the meeting is being held under US compulsion, citing figures like Kushner and Rubio to imply the US is brokering a painful cessation of hostilities based on the flawed Israel-Hamas model.
2. Historical Delegitimization: FSB-KGB archive releases are timed to coincide with diplomatic pressure, reinforcing the RF justification for "de-Nazification" to international audiences.
3. Kinetic Synchronization IO: The Dachnoye claim serves as an immediate, high-impact domestic and international narrative to demonstrate UAF operational collapse simultaneously with diplomatic failure.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Ukrainian public discourse (TSAPLIYENKO/STERENKO) reflects high anxiety regarding US support and the possibility of a detrimental peace agreement, though local fundraising and combat spirit remain strong. Morale vulnerability is focused on the perceived loss of strategic support rather than tactical losses.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Kinetic Thrust at Stepnohorsk Coordinated with Maximum Rear Area Disruption and Diplomatic Sabotage (NLT 301200Z DEC 25) (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Vostok Group will launch an armored assault at Stepnohorsk, utilizing improved visibility and A2A drone support to attempt a breakthrough. Simultaneously, the confirmed UAV groups will strike Dnipropetrovsk logistics and C2 targets. The Dachnoye claim will be amplified globally to maximize the psychological impact on the NCA and foreign partners, forcing a critical, costly decision regarding the commitment of strategic reserves to the rear.

• Focus: Force UAF C2 to believe Dnipropetrovsk is falling simultaneously with diplomatic betrayal.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: Confirmed Operational Breach into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast via Dachnoye, Coupled with Localized C2 Decapitation (NLT 301800Z DEC 25) (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) If the Dachnoye claim proves to be a factual, deep penetration, RF forces will utilize the improved visibility to push motorized rifle groups deeper into the oblast, exploiting the vacuum created by UAF resource redirection to Stepnohorsk. This physical penetration is synchronized with a comprehensive communications denial effort targeting JFC C2 assets in the Zaporizhzhia-Dnipropetrovsk joint area of operation.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The response must be synchronized across the kinetic (Dnipropetrovsk, Stepnohorsk) and strategic (Diplomatic IO) domains.

1. CRITICAL VERIFICATION AND REAR AREA DEFENSE (J2/J3):

   • ACTION: Immediately launch maximum-effort ISR and SOF reconnaissance missions to confirm or deny the RF Dachnoye claim (Dnipropetrovsk). If confirmed, immediately redirect a single reinforced Mechanized Brigade from the lowest-risk operational reserve to a pre-planned blocking position west of Dachnoye.
   • ACTION: Maintain and enforce the Emergency Reallocation Order for mobile AD assets to cover C2 nodes and logistics in the Dnipropetrovsk region, linking the UAV threat to the potential ground threat.
   • RATIONALE: Prevents the RF from achieving operational surprise in the rear and ensures the psychological warfare component of the Dachnoye claim is neutralized or contained rapidly.

2. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS COUNTER-IO (NCA/J7):

   • ACTION: NCA and the diplomatic delegation must issue a Strategic Pre-Bunking Statement NLT 300200Z. This statement must: 1) Explicitly welcome the opportunity to discuss future support with influential US figures, 2) Forcefully reject any interpretation of the meeting as discussing "peace terms" or "capitulation," and 3) Frame the war's end exclusively as VICTORY, DE-OCCUPATION, and ACCOUNTABILITY.
   • ACTION: Simultaneously, activate allied OSINT/media partners to counter the FSB/KGB narrative by highlighting the RF's own historical revisionism.
   • RATIONALE: Reclaims the diplomatic narrative space and shields the delegation from the RF's highly targeted and personalized IO attack.

3. STEPNOHORSK KINETIC PREPARATION (J3):

   • ACTION: Implement Tier 1 Alert Status for anti-armor assets (ATGM, FPV teams) for the UAF 3rd Assault Brigade. Prioritize the deployment of short-range EW systems to specifically jam RF A2A drone frequencies to prevent UAF ISR "blindness" during the anticipated ground assault (NLT 300600Z).
   • RATIONALE: Maximizes defensive capability during the high-visibility kinetic window.

//END OF REPORT//