Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE

DTG: 290930Z NOV 2025 SUBJECT: Systemic Attrition Continuation // Logistical Strangulation Acceleration // High-Level Diplomatic Mobilization

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

The Russian Federation (RF) is continuing its strategy of systemic, deep-rear energy attrition, coupled with aggressive Information Operations (IO) designed to maximize political and civilian paralysis. The primary focus remains the destabilization of Kyiv and the logistical starvation of UAF units defending the Southern Axis.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Deep Rear (CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE): Confirmed high damage severity in the Capital Region.
  • FACT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Approximately 500,000 subscribers in Kyiv and 100,000 in Kyiv Oblast are without power. Public transport in Kyiv is disrupted (Fact).
  • RF has achieved the kinetic aim of widespread, immediate disruption, compounding the strain on emergency services (DSNS) and military logistics.
• Frontline (Zaporizhzhia Axis - Huliaipole): Tactical containment remains stable.
  • FACT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): UAF 33 OShP continues effective counter-infantry operations, documented by drone strikes against RF positions in the Huliaipole sector. RF continues utilizing KABs against Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts (Standard Fire Saturation).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

• Minimal operational constraints. Sub-freezing temperatures increase the criticality of power restoration for the civilian population.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: Dispositions confirm a commitment to attrition prior to maneuver. RF air assets are focused on launching precision strike munitions (missiles/Shaheds) and standoff KAB support, not ground action.
• UAF Control Measures: Kyiv City Military Administration (KCMA) and DSNS are managing the immediate humanitarian fallout. UAF Air Defense (AD) units, such as the 412th Brigade's Darknode unit, continue localized effectiveness against UAVs, but systemic AD saturation failed to prevent critical infrastructure degradation.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

RF intent is to leverage the energy crisis to accelerate the logistical starvation initiated by the Kurier UGV deployment and the Polish IO campaign, forcing a breach at Huliaipole before substantial Western aid arrives.

2.1. Enemy Capabilities and Intentions

• Capability: RF demonstrated highly successful synchronization of kinetic effects (deep strikes) and Information Warfare (amplifying the FSB plot/Yermak rumors).
• Intentions (Kinetic): To keep pressure on repair teams. RF will likely execute secondary, lower-volume strikes to delay grid stabilization (Judgment: HIGH CONFIDENCE).
• Intentions (Hybrid/Political): RF state media (TASS) and affiliated channels are actively pushing the narrative that Ukraine’s leadership is fractured ("Ukraine may go for concessions after Yermak’s resignation"). This confirms the goal of using the kinetic shock to induce political paralysis in Kyiv and weaken international support (Judgment: HIGH CONFIDENCE).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Sustained KAB Use: Continued high volume of KAB use in Donetsk/Dnipropetrovsk indicates RF maintains aerial fire dominance and prioritizes softening defenses ahead of any renewed ground push.
• Deep Strike Synchronization Effectiveness: The strikes effectively tied up UAF resources, facilitating RF’s narrative agenda.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• UAF (CRITICAL): Power loss directly impedes railway signaling, fuel pumping stations, and regional supply chain throughput. This compounds the severe threat posed by the Kurier UGVs operating on the Konstiantynivka GLOC.
• RF: Sustainment rates for standoff munitions are currently adequate to maintain the attrition strategy.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF synchronization remains effective. The immediate exploitation of the crisis via political narratives is swift and coordinated.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Strategic Readiness (HIGH MOBILIZATION): The deployment of a high-level delegation (Defense Minister Umerov, Chief of General Staff Hnatov, and high-ranking Intelligence officials) to the US for negotiations indicates the highest priority is securing military aid continuity and strategic support to mitigate the hybrid offensive (Fact: HIGH CONFIDENCE).
• Frontline Readiness: 33 OShP remains tactically effective but is highly vulnerable to logistical constraints exacerbated by the rear-area power collapse.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (CRITICAL): Systemic power grid failure across multiple oblasts remains the primary operational setback.
• Successes: 1) Sustained containment of the RF Vostok Group at Huliaipole. 2) Successful localized AD operations against Shaheds (Darknode unit).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• IMMEDIATE REQUIREMENT: Secure logistical priority for the US delegation (aid packages, Starlink assurances, critical repair components). Domestically, stabilize power grid and ensure military communication resilience (Operation Guardian Shield implementation).
• CONSTRAINT (NEW): Growing internal political friction (journalism surveillance claims) threatens to divert senior leadership attention and resources away from crisis management.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Primary Narrative (Political Erosion): Active and widespread dissemination of narratives focused on political fracture (Yermak rumors) and the inevitability of Ukrainian "concessions" due to internal chaos.
• Internal Pressure (VULNERABILITY): The surfacing of sensitive, high-profile internal security/surveillance claims (Batusov/Mindich) provides the RF with a perfect opening to amplify domestic distrust in the government's competence and integrity during a critical kinetic crisis (Judgment: HIGH CONFIDENCE).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Morale in Kyiv will decline rapidly if power outage durations exceed 18 hours. The combination of sustained kinetic strikes and political infighting reports creates a cognitive fatigue risk. Swift, transparent action on both infrastructure repair and internal political stability is mandatory.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The urgency of the US delegation (Hnatov/Intelligence presence) underscores the critical nature of the negotiations. Successful diplomatic engagement is necessary to counteract the destabilizing effects of the FSB gas plot and Polish rail sabotage narratives, which are designed to pressure aid flow.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

The RF strategy hinges on maximizing paralysis before committing ground forces. The ground maneuver timeline is now directly linked to the stability of the UAF rear area logistics (power + Konstiantynivka GLOC).

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Persistent Logistical Strangulation and Hybrid Attack Focus (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to delay the decisive Huliaipole ground assault until NLT 301200Z NOV.

1. Exploitation of Internal Friction: RF IO will massively amplify reports of internal political scandals (e.g., journalist surveillance, Yermak rumors) to force a crisis response in Kyiv, diverting resources from the energy grid stabilization effort (NLT 291500Z).
2. Kurier UGV Surge: Given the reduced visibility and potential C4ISR disruption caused by the power outages, RF will increase deployment or operational tempo of Kurier UGVs to maximize interdiction success on the Konstiantynivka GLOC (NLT 291800Z).
3. Localized Secondary Strikes: Targeting of transformer stations, emergency generator depots, and confirmed AD positions in the six affected oblasts to keep repair teams pinned down.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: Synchronized Starlink Blackout and Huliaipole Breach (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF executes an unanticipated, theater-wide C4ISR degradation (via Starlink denial or significant jamming), synchronized with a political announcement (e.g., Polish railway closure or US aid freeze pretext). Under conditions of C2 blindness and zero logistical inflow, RF Vostok Group launches a massive, combined-arms assault against the ammunition-starved 33 OShP at Huliaipole, utilizing massed drone swarms and TOS-2 saturation to achieve operational breakthrough and sever the Southern Front.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The current environment demands simultaneous management of kinetic damage, logistical strangulation, and political erosion.

1. LOGISTICS AND COUNTER-TECH OPERATIONS (J4/J3/SOF):

   • ACTION: Immediate Authorization for Aerial Fire Support on Konstiantynivka GLOC. Given the extreme risk to the 33 OShP logistics, divert UAF fixed-wing/heavy UCAV assets (if available) to provide overhead security and precision strike capability to the Hunter-Killer Task Force (HKTF-K) operating against the Kurier UGVs. Do not rely solely on ground teams.
   • RATIONALE: The energy crisis accelerates the time-critical nature of GLOC security. Air support is necessary to rapidly eliminate the persistent UGV threat before the 33 OShP is starved.

2. C4ISR AND ENERGY HARDENING (J6/J7):

   • ACTION: Execute FULL redundancy shift (Guardian Shield). Mandate all logistics convoys operating in the six affected oblasts transition to fully independent, low-emission radio nets for routing and status reporting, assuming a zero-power grid state. Ensure mobile AD assets (Gepard/Avenger) are specifically tasked with protecting mobile fuel/generator depots and high-value logistics nodes (Judgment: HIGH CONFIDENCE).
   • RATIONALE: Mitigate C2 loss during the critical resupply window and protect the few functioning power sources from follow-on RF strikes.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION AND POLITICAL STABILITY (NCA/MFA/IO):

   • ACTION: Immediately issue a cohesive government statement that addresses both the kinetic and hybrid threats. The statement must: 1) Condemn the energy strikes as terrorism; 2) Directly rebut the "Yermak resignation" and internal political friction narratives as RF-orchestrated IO designed to paralyze Ukraine during crisis; 3) Publicly frame the US delegation (Hnatov/Umerov) as a sign of strength and ironclad military alignment, not desperation.
   • RATIONALE: Swift, synchronized political messaging is required to deny RF the ability to exploit the internal political chaos and maintain public confidence during power outages.

//END OF REPORT//