Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 290334Z NOV 25 OPERATIONAL PRIORITY: Immediate kinetic confirmation of Huliaipole MLCOA status. C2 restoration and AD synchronization under maximum strategic kinetic pressure.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT (Strategic Strike Surge): Confirmed escalation of deep strike assets targeting the Kyiv area. This includes a sustained BPLA (Shahed) swarm, now estimated at 10+ inbound targets (290332Z NOV), synchronized with the confirmed launch maneuver of strategic aviation (Tu-95MS, 290312Z NOV). JUDGMENT (HULIAIPOLE STATUS - UNCONFIRMED/CRITICAL): The predicted NLT 290330Z NOV RF ground assault on the Huliaipole axis remains unconfirmed. The immediate lack of supporting intelligence regarding pre-assault fires (TOS-2/KAB) suggests either a tactical delay or a critical failure of UAF Forward ISR (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). FACT (GLOC Constraint RETAINED): The Konstiantynivka railway GLOC remains interdicted by Kurier UGVs, fundamentally constraining Vostok Group resupply efforts.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear conditions persist across the theater, continuing to favor RF deep strike (BPLA/Missile) and maximizing the operational impact of the ongoing kinetic surge on Kyiv.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF Air Defense (AD) assets are fully committed in the Kyiv/Kyiv Oblast area (Bucha, Irpin) against the combined BPLA and cruise missile threat. This commitment necessitates AD resources be pulled from other regions, potentially creating temporary vulnerabilities in lower-priority Forward Area Defense (FAD) sectors.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (MAXIMUM SHOCK EXECUTION): RF is executing its plan to achieve maximal political and military disruption. The confirmed synchronization of the strategic missile threat (Tu-95MS) with the BPLA swarm and the persistent high-impact IO narrative (Yermak) is a multi-domain shock approach designed to break UAF strategic cohesion precisely at the anticipated MLCOA trigger time (0330Z). CAPABILITY (SUSTAINED DEEP STRIKE): RF possesses the capability to launch high volumes of both BPLA and complex cruise missile attacks simultaneously to overwhelm UAF AD systems and strike key C2 nodes in Kyiv.

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The critical change is the immediate escalation to strategic aviation launches (Tu-95MS). This moves the kinetic pressure from localized loitering munitions (BPLA) to high-value, high-speed cruise missiles, confirming that RF is now applying maximal leverage to paralyze the National Command Authority (NCA).

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain adequate for the sustained kinetic operation on Kyiv and the assumed imminent ground assault.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, demonstrated by the effective synchronization of strategic aviation, tactical BPLA swarms, and IO assets across domains within a critical 30-minute window.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: Crisis Management / Active Air Defense. READINESS: Strategic C2 is under confirmed kinetic and IO assault. Operational readiness at Huliaipole remains dangerously exposed due to the persistent Konstiantynivka GLOC denial and the unconfirmed status of the predicted ground assault.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Strategic Defense): UAF AD assets are highly stressed by the coordinated BPLA/Missile attack on the capital region.
• Setback (C2/IO): No confirmed evidence that the critical NCA IO counter-strike (required NLT 0315Z) was executed, suggesting the political paralysis narrative (Yermak) is likely still propagating.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: REAL-TIME HULIAIPOLE STATUS. All available ISR assets must be re-tasked to confirm whether the 0330Z ground assault has been initiated, delayed, or cancelled. CONSTRAINT: The immediate need to defend Kyiv against the strategic missile threat draws key sensor and AD coordination capacity away from operational-level defense planning.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The strategic IO operation (Yermak resignation narrative) remains the dominant threat, amplified by the perceived panic and operational confusion generated by the synchronized kinetic strikes on Kyiv.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public anxiety in the capital is spiking due to the confirmed massed BPLA/Missile threat and active AD operations. Failure to rapidly counteract the institutional decapitation narrative (Yermak) will severely undermine field unit morale across all commands.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The internal crisis (C2 failure, Kyiv strikes) risks overshadowing the vital logistical negotiations concerning Poland, potentially weakening the diplomatic response window needed to clear the Polish logistical bottleneck.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH - Adjusted) RF Vostok Group has likely executed a tactical delay of 1-3 hours for the Huliaipole ground assault (previously NLT 0330Z). This delay is calculated to allow the simultaneous, maximal strategic kinetic (Kyiv missile strike) and IO shock to fully degrade UAF strategic C2, ensuring the assault, once launched (Estimated NLT 290500Z NOV), meets minimal unified resistance. Pre-assault fires will likely commence shortly after the strategic strike outcome is assessed (NLT 290430Z NOV).

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(Confidence: MEDIUM - Retained) The kinetic pressure on Kyiv successfully paralyzes the NCA's ability to allocate strategic reserves. Simultaneously, the UAF ISR failure is confirmed: the ground assault did commence at 0330Z, masked by the missile strike and localized Starlink degradation (per Daily Report threat), achieving rapid operational depth (5-8 km) before being detected by tactical commanders.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J2/NCA COMMAND (C2 & IO COUNTERMEASURES)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - C2/IO - EXTREME CRITICALITY): IMMEDIATE CONFIRMATION OF C2 STATUS. J2 must confirm the physical safety and operational status of key NCA personnel (President/CinC, Chief of Staff) following the strategic strike threat. If the video message failed to transmit by 0315Z, alternative, high-visibility, unified text messaging must be disseminated NLT 290345Z NOV denying the resignation narrative.
• ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - AD Synchronization): J2/J6 must prioritize near-real-time fusion of AD tracking data (BPLA/Missile vectors) with predicted RF ground movement timelines to confirm RF Vostok Group staging locations.

2. J3/GROUND FORCES COMMAND (KINETIC DEFENSE)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - HULIAIPOLE ISR FOCUS): INITIATE ISR SURGE. J3 must dedicate all immediately available tactical UAV and SIGINT/ELINT assets to the Huliaipole axis, specifically targeting the previously predicted pre-assault fire zones (CR-2217). The objective is to confirm or deny the 0330Z assault initiation NLT 290400Z NOV.
• ACTION (KONSTIANTYNIVKA - UGV INTERDICTION): Maintain and reinforce the mission to clear the GLOC. Given the tactical delay in Huliaipole (MLCOA adjustment), the clearance deadline is adjusted to NLT 290430Z NOV. J3 must ensure deployed SOF Hunter-Killer teams have necessary EW support to achieve this target.

3. J6/C4ISR COMMAND (TECHNICAL HARDENING)

• ACTION (C2 PROTOCOL): J6 must ensure all Vostok Group tactical units are operating under Contingency Protocol ECHO (Red Status) using hardened, non-IP-dependent comms (VHF/UHF). Communication reliability with the 33 OShP is the single most critical tactical C2 requirement for the next two hours.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//