Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 282230Z NOV 25 OPERATIONAL PRIORITY: Immediate response to confirmed RF strategic aviation launch (Tu-95MS); Confirmation of tactical ground force status in Kostiantynivka (GLOC defense); Coordinated counter-IO to political destabilization campaign.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT: The RF Phase III multi-domain strike wave is continuing, escalating from UAV saturation to confirmed strategic aviation deployment.

• Aviation Threat (CRITICAL): Confirmed launch of Tu-95MS strategic bombers from Olenya Air Base (21:52Z). This confirms the high-risk prediction and indicates an imminent launch of Kh-101/Kh-102 cruise missiles NLT 290100Z NOV, targeting high-value infrastructure (CI) and potentially C2 nodes.
• Kinetic Saturation: UAV activity persists across Central and Western Ukraine (Khmelnytskyi, Vinnytsia), with an immediate threat group converging on Kyiv from the East (21:54Z). RF intent is to saturate AD across the depth of the theater.
• Donetsk Axis (GLOC VULNERABILITY): The status of the RF ground advance into Kostiantynivka remains CRITICAL/UNCONFIRMED ADVANCE (pending CR-2208 results). Failure to confirm and neutralize this penetration before 290000Z NOV risks GLOC severance.
• Kupyansk Axis (LOCAL STABILIZATION): UAF 14 OMbR and 30 OMbR successfully repelled an RF assault group, maintaining the tactical line (21:50Z).

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

JUDGEMENT: Clear conditions continue to favor RF strategic aviation and persistent ISR/strike coordination. The immediate threat vector is high-altitude cruise missile ingress.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

FACT: RF forces have been forced to declare a RED alert for UAV attacks over Lipetsk (21:54Z), confirming the continued effectiveness of UAF deep strike operations on RF strategic rear areas. JUDGEMENT: UAF AD must immediately execute full alert procedures for the Tu-95MS strike. The control measure priority has shifted from localized UAV engagement to strategic intercept preparation across the Central and Southern defense layers.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (STRATEGIC KINETIC): RF intent is to utilize the strategic strike (Tu-95MS) to paralyze UAF C2/CI simultaneously with the critical ground advance on the Konstiantynivka GLOC. This is a deliberate synchronization of deep strike and operational maneuver. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) INTENTION (C4ISR DEGRADATION): RF claims destruction of a UAF EW station near Lyutivka (21:34Z). If confirmed, this indicates RF intent to actively degrade UAF electronic defense/C2 resilience at the localized level while mass strikes occur strategically. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

FACT: RF has activated the full range of kinetic capabilities, leveraging strategic aviation (Tu-95MS) after initial drone waves successfully fixed UAF AD assets across multiple oblasts. This signals the primary strike assets are incoming under cover of the drone swarm. FACT (IO Exploitation): RF IO has escalated the political destabilization campaign by utilizing high-profile, verifiable data points (citing Rada Secretary Kostyenko on youth emigration) to maximize the psychological impact of the mobilization narrative.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

JUDGEMENT: The confirmed ability to launch Tu-95MS strategic aircraft during ongoing massed drone strikes suggests RF retains significant high-value munition stockpiles and logistical capacity for theater-wide operations.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

JUDGEMENT: RF C2 synchronization remains highly effective, linking the immediate threat to the Konstiantynivka GLOC with strategic kinetic and cognitive domain operations. This is a professional multi-domain execution.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

JUDGEMENT: UAF readiness is now entering a critical phase, requiring forces to simultaneously execute the counter-attack on Kostiantynivka (J3 Ground) and implement full readiness for strategic ballistic defense (J3 AD). The immediate focus must be hardening C2 against the expected strategic strike impact.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Kupyansk/Kharkiv): Successful defensive action by the 14th and 30th Brigades provides a positive tactical morale anchor in the northern sector.
• Setback (AD Burden): The strategic aviation launch confirms the UAF AD network is now facing its maximum threat profile, stretched by UAV saturation and requiring immediate allocation of long-range interceptors.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (AD INTERCEPTION): Allocation of maximum high-value interceptor stocks (PATRIOT, NASAMS) to the predicted flight path of the Tu-95MS strike packages. Prioritize CI and C2 protection.
• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (C2 REDUNDANCY): Immediate verification that Operation GUARDIAN SHIELD (transition to redundant comms) is complete, mitigating the risk posed by the claimed EW degradation and potential Starlink disruption (MDCOA).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

FACT (STRATEGIC IO TARGETING): RF state media (TASS) and IO channels are leveraging the youth exodus narrative (121,000 men) to destabilize domestic morale and pressure the NCA on mobilization policies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) FACT (DIPLOMATIC FRAGMENTATION): RF IO is exploiting perceived internal US divisions (Senator Rubio ignoring the NATO meeting) to undermine international cohesion and the perceived strength of the US negotiating position ahead of the Witkoff meeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) FACT (HYBRID PROBING): The Vilnius airport closure due to "unknown aerial balloons" (21:58Z) is highly suggestive of RF testing of NATO/EU airspace response protocols or generating political noise near a key NATO logistical hub.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

JUDGEMENT: Morale is under severe, concurrent pressure from massed kinetic attacks and narratives of political chaos and demographic collapse. A decisive, rapid counter-IO response (NCA address, CR-2210) is essential to prevent internal fragmentation.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

JUDGEMENT: The perception of political stability is rapidly deteriorating due to RF IO exploitation. The absence of a major US figure at the NATO meeting (Rubio) will be leveraged to portray Western commitment as wavering. Failure to secure the GLOC will compound diplomatic weakness.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will attempt to achieve simultaneous kinetic and cognitive effects NLT 290600Z NOV.

1. Strategic Strike Execution: Tu-95MS derived cruise missiles will strike high-value CI (energy/railway infrastructure) and key C2 nodes (Kyiv/Dnipro) NLT 290100Z NOV to maximize disruption during the critical phase of the Kostiantynivka operation.
2. GLOC Severance Consolidation: Utilizing the kinetic distraction, RF ground forces (if confirmation is established via CR-2208) will rapidly consolidate control of the Kostiantynivka railway depot, severing the supply line to Huliaipole.
3. IO Sustainment: RF will sustain the narrative of internal Ukrainian collapse (mobilization failure, leadership instability) through the strategic strike aftermath to maximize political leverage before the Witkoff meeting.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH)

1. C2 Paralysis & Southern Breakthrough: The strategic missile strike successfully degrades a major C2 center (e.g., Kyiv AD/C2) and Starlink communications simultaneously. Combined with the loss of the Konstiantynivka GLOC, the 33 OShP suffers critical logistical failure, allowing the RF Vostok Group to execute a decisive breakthrough towards Zaporizhzhia NLT 300000Z NOV.
2. NATO Boundary Incident: RF hybrid operations (e.g., Vilnius/Poland) escalate, forcing a NATO Article 4 consultation or a politically paralyzing incident that compels European allies to reduce aid commitments due to fears of escalation.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/AD COMMAND (CRITICAL STRATEGIC DEFENSE)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - IMMEDIATE INTERCEPTION): EXECUTE STRATEGIC ALERT PROTOCOLS. Immediately deploy maximum PATRIOT/NASAMS/S-300 assets to cover predicted Kh-101/Kh-102 ingress routes. Priority targets for protection are primary C2 bunkers and railway junction infrastructure (critical for GLOC redundancy).
• ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - ISR RE-TASKING): Immediately re-task long-range SIGINT/ELINT and all available high-altitude UAVs to track the expected Tu-95MS flight path and warhead separation/trajectory data for accurate targeting (CR-2211).

2. J3/GROUND FORCES COMMAND (GLOC DEFENSE & WESTERN AXIS HOLD)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - Kostiantynivka VULNERABILITY): CONFIRM COUNTER-ATTACK STATUS. Verify that the 282400Z NOV order for maneuver force deployment to the Kostiantynivka railway depot is being executed. Lack of execution confirmation represents an existential threat to the Southern Front. If forces are not engaged, divert the nearest reserve element immediately.
• ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - KUPYANSK EXPLOITATION): Exploit the RF assault failure near Kupyansk. Authorize limited, high-impact counter-battery fire and localized probing attacks (e.g., SSO teams) to disrupt the RF regrouping and prevent reserves from being redeployed south.

3. J2/NCA (COGNITIVE DOMAIN CONTROL)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - COUNTER-IO DIRECTIVE): ADDRESS STRATEGIC IO NARRATIVES. The NCA address must directly confront the TASS-amplified narrative on youth exodus and frame the military successes (Kazan, Kupyansk) as evidence of national resilience. Address the diplomatic friction (Rubio) by emphasizing consensus on security commitments, regardless of individual attendance.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//