Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 282330Z NOV 25 OPERATIONAL PRIORITY: Immediate combat confirmation and counter-attack on Russian Federation (RF) advance into Kostiantynivka (Donetsk); Critical NCA counter-IO response to political instability narrative; Sustained AD defense against massed multi-domain strike wave.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT: The RF Phase III strike wave continues, synchronized with aggressive information operations (IO).

• Central/Eastern Axes (KINETIC SATURATION): Confirmed explosions in Dnipro and Kharkiv (21:04Z – 21:06Z). UAV groups are moving across multiple oblasts, including Vinnytsia, Sumy, Poltava, and Mykolaiv/Kirovohrad (Novoukrainskyi district), confirming RF intent to stretch UAF AD resources across the theater.
• Donetsk Axis (CRITICAL ADVANCE): Unconfirmed but High-Risk Fact: Pro-RF military channels claim RF ground forces have entered Kostiantynivka town from Ivanopillya and are engaging for control of the railway depot south of the station (21:15Z). If confirmed, this constitutes direct tactical engagement on the Konstiantynivka Ground Line of Communication (GLOC)—the primary logistical artery supporting the Huliaipole/Southern defense.
• Key Terrain: Kostiantynivka Railway Depot (Donetsk) is now the most immediate high-value tactical terrain. Loss of this position severs the GLOC.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

FACT: Clear skies and low cloud cover persist, facilitating high-altitude UAV/strike operations and persistent ISR. The conditions increase the risk of strategic aviation employment tonight (21:28Z warning).

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

JUDGEMENT: UAF AD is operating under severe duress, forced to commit resources defensively against high-volume, multi-vector threats (Kyiv, Central CI, Kharkiv). Defensive control measures have failed to prevent confirmed RF tactical engagement on the critical Konstiantynivka GLOC (pending confirmation of the RF claim). UAF forces must immediately prioritize establishing a tactical blocking force in Kostiantynivka to support C-UGV teams already interdicting the Kurier threat.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (TACTICAL/KINETIC): RF intent has accelerated. Beyond UAV saturation, the immediate goal is the physical severance of the Konstiantynivka GLOC by seizing the railway junction (21:15Z claim), thereby isolating UAF 33 OShP at Huliaipole NLT 291200Z NOV. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). INTENTION (STRATEGIC/IO): RF intent is to use the confirmed Yermak/Umerov substitution to generate a crisis of confidence in Kyiv’s negotiating authority ahead of the Witkoff meeting. This political instability narrative is being immediately amplified through state media (TASS) and IO channels, linking political failure to military morale decline (Odesa cadet incident, youth exodus claims). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

FACT (GROUND OPERATIONS): RF shift from passive GLOC interdiction (Kurier UGV ambush) to active ground force engagement (entry into Kostiantynivka town). This signals a commitment to sever the GLOC through conventional means, likely utilizing reserves freed up from the Pokrovsk consolidation. FACT (IO FOCUS): RF IO is now directly linking the political delegation change to domestic security and morale failures, seeking to create a cascade effect of internal mistrust and external diplomatic doubt.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

JUDGEMENT: RF demonstrated ability to sustain high-intensity, massed UAV strikes over 6+ hours confirms continued operational deep-strike capability despite previous UAF successes (Alabuga warehouse). The immediate RF logistical priority is securing the Konstiantynivka junction to deny UAF access.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

JUDGEMENT: RF C2 synchronization remains highly effective, linking simultaneous kinetic attacks, potential ground advances, and IO objectives targeting strategic negotiations.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

JUDGEMENT: UAF readiness on the Southern axis is critically dependent on immediate and confirmed resupply via the Konstiantynivka GLOC. Tactical forces (likely reserve/territorial defense units) must be immediately task-organized to deny RF control of the railway depot, supplementing the C-UGV counter-teams.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Strike): Confirmed reports of massive infrastructure damage/blackout in Kazan (21:12Z, 21:15Z), likely targeting power substations. This is a significant success in degrading RF industrial/logistical capacity and achieving reciprocal psychological impact.
• Setback (GLOC): The tactical vulnerability of Kostiantynivka town now represents a critical military setback, potentially nullifying previous containment efforts at Huliaipole.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (GLOC DEFENSE): Immediate allocation of fire support and maneuver forces to confirm and repel the RF advance on the Kostiantynivka railway depot.
• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (BALLISTIC DEFENSE): Anticipated strategic aviation sorties and increased ballistic threat (21:28Z) necessitate pre-positioning high-altitude interceptors (e.g., PATRIOT, NASAMS) for key CI/C2 centers (Kyiv, Dnipro).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

FACT (CRITICAL VULNERABILITY): The IO objective has shifted from rumor generation to confirmed exploitation. RF IO is successfully framing the Umerov substitution as political chaos, utilizing outlets like TASS and linked military blogs (21:23Z, 21:25Z). FACT (MORALE TARGETING): RF IO is actively using narratives concerning UAF mobilization failure (121,000 youth exodus claim) and localized tragedy (Odesa cadet suicide) to erode internal morale and public trust in the NCA. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

JUDGEMENT: Public sentiment is under simultaneous pressure from kinetic attacks and political intrigue. The NCA must address the domestic impact of the political change immediately to prevent IO success in creating internal fractures and mobilizing anti-war sentiment.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

JUDGEMENT: The diplomatic mission remains severely compromised until the political narrative is stabilized. Failure to control the perception of the delegation change will risk shifting the focus of the Witkoff meeting away from aid substance and toward Ukrainian internal stability, threatening MDCOA (Strategic Political Defeat).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will attempt to secure the Konstiantynivka railway junction NLT 290600Z NOV.

1. GLOC Severance: RF forces will utilize concentrated artillery fire, FPV drones, and immediate follow-on ground forces to hold the railway depot, cutting all high-volume supply flow to the South.
2. Sustained AD Fixing: RF will continue massed UAV attacks, primarily targeting Dnipro CI and the Western AD corridor (Vinnytsia/Kirovohrad) to keep UAF high-value interceptors committed and prevent their re-tasking to the Eastern front.
3. IO Overload: Strategic RF IO assets will flood international media with analysis and commentary predicting Ukraine’s internal political collapse before the Witkoff meeting, undermining diplomatic leverage.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH)

1. C2 Paralysis & Southern Breakthrough: RF successfully severs the Konstiantynivka GLOC and executes a theatre-wide Starlink degradation/denial (CR-2206 confirmed failure). Logistical starvation and C2 collapse force the rout of the 33 OShP, enabling a Vostok Group operational breakthrough towards Zaporizhzhia NLT 300000Z NOV.
2. Strategic Political Defeat: RF IO successfully engineers a diplomatic incident or public perception failure at the Witkoff meeting, leading to an immediate, confirmed reduction in strategic US defense aid and forcing Kyiv to enter disadvantageous negotiations.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/GROUND FORCES COMMAND (CRITICAL GLOC DEFENSE)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION): EXECUTE EMERGENCY COUNTER-ATTACK. Divert immediate maneuver forces (e.g., armored reserves, mechanized infantry) currently available to the Kostiantynivka axis. Prioritize rapid deployment to the railway depot area (vicinity 48.4900 N, 37.7100 E) to establish a blocking position and confirm/repel the RF advance.
• ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - C-UGV RE-TASKING): Integrate C-UGV Hunter-Killer teams currently focused on Kurier hunting directly into the tactical defense of Kostiantynivka town. Use them for immediate proximity defense and clearing operations on the main access roads.

2. J2/NCA (CRITICAL IO STABILIZATION)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - COUNTER-IO DIRECTIVE): ISSUE URGENT PRESIDENTIAL/NCA ADDRESS NLT 290400Z NOV. The address must simultaneously:
  1. Acknowledge the deep strike success (Kazan) to boost domestic morale.
  2. Provide a unified, forward-looking narrative on the Umerov substitution, emphasizing its tactical necessity for defense procurement.
  3. Preemptively address the political exploitation of the cadet suicide and mobilization rumors as foreign psychological operations.
• ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - DISRUPTION EXPLOITATION): Direct J3 and J2 to rapidly assess the operational impact of the Kazan power outage (CR-2207 follow-up) and authorize follow-on strikes against any RF logistical choke points that rely on the affected power grid.

3. J3/AD COMMAND (KINETIC DEFENSE OPTIMIZATION)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - AIR DEFENSE ALERT): Raise the alert status for all long-range AD systems (PATRIOT, S-300) in the Central and Northern regions to intercept expected high-value ballistic/strategic aviation threats (predicted 21:28Z threat). Prioritize protection of the primary C2 nodes (Kyiv) and operational reserves staging areas (Dnipro).

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

//END OF REPORT//