Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) – OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE

TIME: 280745Z NOV 25

---

SUBJECT: Multi-Domain Update: Huliaipole Front Stabilized (Tactical Success) Concurrently with Escalated Strategic C2 Crisis (IO Apex).

SUMMARY: The immediate kinetic threat predicted for 280730Z at Huliaipole (Zaporizhzhia Axis) has been effectively countered. The 33rd Separate Assault Regiment reports the Russian Federation (RF) assault was contained and the front stabilized as of 07:28Z. This crucial tactical success provides a temporary window for reinforcement. However, the concurrent strategic C2 attack (NABU/SAP investigation targeting the Head of the Presidential Office) has reached its IO Apex, with RF media leveraging the event to suggest systemic collapse and US retaliation. The priority shifts from emergency kinetic response to C2 Crisis Management and reinforcement of the stabilized line.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

1. Huliaipole Axis (Zaporizhzhia): The primary defensive line remains intact. UAF forces (33rd Assault Regiment and adjacent units) have successfully stabilized the front following the RF Vostok Group's assault attempt (07:28Z). RF forces are confirmed to be pausing or reorganizing following the repulse.
2. Konstiantynivka (GLOC): RF MoD claims an ATGM strike on an "enemy dugout" in this direction (07:05Z). This confirms ongoing tactical interdiction efforts designed to attrit and delay UAF reserves attempting to support the Eastern/Southern sectors.
3. Sumy Region (North-East): New threat vector confirmed: RF tactical aviation launched Guided Aerial Bombs (KAB) against targets in Sumshchyna (07:33Z). This is likely an opportunistic strike capitalizing on perceived UAF resource reallocation or a diversionary effort.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Conditions remain clear and stable, favoring RF ISR and fixed-wing strike platforms (KAB delivery) in both the Zaporizhzhia and now the Sumy regions.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

1. UAF (Blue Force): Forces at Huliaipole are in a defensive consolidation phase. Air Defense maintained a high rate of effectiveness overnight, neutralizing 63/72 UAVs and 0/1 Iskander-M (87.5% success rate). The focus remains on maintaining communication and coordinating C2 between the tactical commanders (J3 South) and the distracted National Command Authority (NCA).
2. RF (Red Force): RF Vostok Group has failed its immediate H-Hour objective. This is assessed as a temporary operational pause. RF is likely leveraging heavy indirect fire (KAB/Artillery) to maintain pressure while re-staging for a subsequent attempt or shifting effort elsewhere. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA)

Primary Intent Update: Maintain strategic pressure via C2/IO paralysis while forcing UAF attrition at the stabilized Huliaipole line.

• Kinetic: RF forces demonstrated the capacity for rapid synchronization of the ground attack with the IO strike, but lacked sufficient force projection or surprise to breach well-prepared UAF defenses immediately. The Vostok Group's combat effectiveness remains high, but its immediate momentum is broken.
• Hybrid Warfare: The information environment has reached the projected apex. RF IO channels (e.g., Voenkor Kotsnews, RVvoenkor) are now framing the Yermak investigation as direct US retaliation for rejecting the "Trump plan" (07:23Z, 07:13Z). This deepens the intended strategic distraction and sows distrust in UAF relationships with Western partners.
• Diplomatic Conditioning: The confirmation of Putin’s state visit to India (Dec 4-5) serves to reinforce the RF narrative of global diplomatic relevance and offset isolation (07:07Z, 07:17Z).

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Logistical flow for RF Vostok Group is sufficient for immediate, sustained artillery/air attrition, but a rapid, large-scale ground assault rebound may be delayed by the need to reposition fire support assets following the failed push. Tactical interdiction efforts against the Konstiantynivka GLOC continue to be a priority.

C. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust in its ability to synchronize IO/Political events globally. Tactical C2 for the Vostok Group appears functional, capable of executing a coordinated H-Hour, but the tactical objective was not achieved.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Tactical morale is assessed as boosted by the successful repulse at Huliaipole. Operational readiness remains compromised by the ongoing NCA crisis. The key challenge is isolating the operational military C2 from political friction while maintaining the unified national front.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• CRITICAL SUCCESS: Containment and stabilization of the Huliaipole assault front by 07:28Z. This is a critical defensive victory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Success: Effective anti-air defense against massed overnight strike (63 confirmed kills).
• CRITICAL SETBACK (Strategic): The full activation and aggressive leveraging of the Yermak investigation by RF IO creates severe strategic instability at the NCA level, undermining decision-making speed and international credibility.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is shifting from time to H-Hour to C2 integrity and political messaging. The QRF commitment, while still necessary for follow-on defensive lines, can now be executed deliberately rather than reactively, provided the lull holds.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Core Narrative: Systemic Ukrainian corruption linked to foreign interference (US/FBI involvement in NABU/SAP creation), leading to the isolation of the Ukrainian leadership for resisting Western peace demands. The goal is to delegitimize the NCA (07:13Z, 07:23Z).
• UAF Counter-Narrative Requirement: Must rapidly pivot the public narrative to highlight the Huliaipole success as evidence of military competence and stability, contrasting this with the manufactured political chaos. The NABU/SAP action must be explicitly framed as evidence of democracy/institutional strength (as per previous guidance), not state fracture.

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment risks shifting from unified resolve to internal doubt and suspicion due to the scandal's severity and timing. The UAF must rapidly confirm the Huliaipole victory to offset the strategic shock.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF push for non-Western alignment (India trip) requires a rapid counter-IO effort to ensure key partners (EU/US) view the Yermak crisis as a domestic anti-corruption mechanism, not a sign of state collapse or US political machinations.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Attrition and C2 Targeting (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Huliaipole Attrition: RF Vostok Group refrains from a second immediate mechanized thrust but increases sustained, heavy indirect fire (artillery, TOS, KAB saturation) against the stabilized UAF lines to maximize casualties and test points of failure.
2. IO Sustainment: RF IO sustains peak output on the Yermak scandal for the next 48 hours, linking it to the alleged collapse of the Pokrovsk pocket and humanitarian crisis narratives.
3. Sumy/Northern Pressure: RF increases KAB/drone strikes in the Sumy or Kharkiv axis (as observed 07:33Z) to force UAF Air Defense and reserve reallocation away from the Zaporizhzhia front.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: Flanking Exploitation and Deep Penetration (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1. Vostok Group Re-Attack: RF Vostok Group utilizes the period of UAF NCA distraction (0800Z-1200Z) to execute a swift, coordinated mechanized flanking maneuver, potentially utilizing uncommitted reserves (P-1 GAP remains on reserve status/location).
2. Infrastructure Interdiction: RF utilizes deep strike (missiles/UAVs) to target confirmed regional C2 nodes or key logistics chokepoints that survived the overnight strike, directly paralyzing the J3's ability to reinforce the stabilized Huliaipole sector.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. C2 AND STRATEGIC STABILITY (NCA/J2/J3)

• ACTION (CRITICAL - C2 INTEGRITY): The NCA must issue the mandated statement NLT 280900Z. This statement must lead with the Huliaipole defensive victory and then address the NABU/SAP action by framing it as a demonstration of institutional health and accountability, confirming that military operations are unaffected by the investigation.
  • Confidence: HIGH
• ACTION (IO COUNTER-ATTACK): J2 IO assets must flood domestic and international feeds with imagery and reports detailing the Russian failure at Huliaipole. Contrast the failed kinetic strike with the RF IO reliance on domestic political scandal. Highlight the 87.5% air defense success rate.

2. FORCE MANAGEMENT & DEFENSIVE CONSOLIDATION (J3/FIRE COMMAND)

• ACTION (HULIAIPOLE CONSOLIDATION): Utilize the temporary lull to reinforce the stabilized line with engineering assets and pre-sited heavy fire support. Execute immediate, suppressive counter-battery fire against confirmed RF artillery positions west and south of Huliaipole NLT 281000Z to reduce the anticipated attrition phase.
• ACTION (QRF VECTORING): QRF deployment should now prioritize reinforcement and depth defense rather than a frontal counter-assault. Vector QRF to cover potential flanking routes (North and South of the stabilized line) to pre-empt the MDCOA.
• ACTION (NORTH-EAST THREAT): J3 must monitor the Sumy KAB threat. Prepare to deploy a low-level AD asset to the area if strike intensity increases, potentially pulling limited assets from less threatened Northern or Western sectors.

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS