Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) – OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE (HULIAIPOLE AXIS)

TIME: 280700Z NOV 25

---

SUBJECT: Multi-Domain Crisis Synchronization: RF Huliaipole Assault Coincides with Critical Ukrainian C2/Political Stability Threat.

SUMMARY: The Russian Federation (RF) is executing a complex synchronization strategy. The imminent kinetic assault on the Huliaipole Axis (H-Hour NLT 280730Z), supported by confirmed deep kinetic interdiction (KAB strikes) against the QRF GLOC, is now concurrent with a major domestic political crisis. Anti-corruption bodies (NABU/SAP) have initiated searches targeting the Head of the Presidential Office (Yermak). RF Information Operations (IO) are immediately weaponizing this event alongside the Orban visit to Moscow to induce command paralysis and undermine UAF legitimacy at the critical point of the tactical engagement. Defensive success hinges on immediate stabilization of the political-military C2 structure.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

1. Huliaipole Defensive Belt (Zaporizhzhia): Remains the primary kinetic fire focus. RF Vostok Group is confirmed in final staging for mechanized assault NLT 280730Z.
2. QRF GLOC Corridor (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast): Status remains Active Kinetic Interdiction Zone. Previous KAB strikes confirm RF intent to attrite or delay the operational reserve.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, stable conditions persist, favoring RF fixed-wing KAB/FAB delivery, ISR, and precision targeting. No constraints on planned mechanized movement.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

1. UAF (Blue Force): Forward defenses are bracing for the main thrust. QRF deployment is underway, critically exposed to deep strike.
2. RF (Red Force): Forces are committed to the assault timeline. Synchronization between conventional (Vostok Group), deep kinetic (KAB platforms), and hybrid (IO/Diplomatic) domains is assessed as optimal.
3. Peripheral Actions: RF sources report minor operational activity in the Sumy direction, likely intended to fix UAF forces in the Northern Operational Zone. UAF sources confirm successful deep strikes (UAVs) on military targets in the Saratov region (supporting previous reports of sustained deep asymmetric operations).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA)

Intent: RF seeks immediate tactical success at Huliaipole while forcing strategic paralysis within Kyiv's C2 structure through hybrid synchronization.

• Tactical Robotics Integration (LOW CONFIDENCE, HIGH IMPACT): Confirmed deployment of the NTRK Kurier Ground Robotic Complex by RF forces. This system (likely configured with a heavy machine gun) indicates RF is introducing new, specialized assets to breach fortified UAF positions, potentially to reduce casualties in the immediate assault phase.
• Full Spectrum IO Synchronization (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The timing of the aggressive weaponization of the Yermak search (confirmed 280615Z - 280628Z) demonstrates highly effective RF intelligence targeting of UAF political vulnerability, deliberately timed for the highest operational tempo (H-Hour - 280730Z) and diplomatic pressure (Orban visit).
• Strategic Communications (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF is projecting new strategic technological capabilities (announcement of the "Starlink analog" deployment in December), intended to counter UAF communications superiority and reinforce the narrative of long-term Russian technological resilience.

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics for the Huliaipole assault remain robust (confirmed KAB/FAB usage). RF AD capability is highly engaged; Colonelcassad reports 136 UAF UAVs intercepted overnight, confirming sustained UAF deep strike attempts but also demonstrating the volume of RF AD coverage.

C. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 effectiveness is assessed as HIGH. The ability to synchronize kinetic (Huliaipole), counter-reserve (KAB), diplomatic (Orban), and internal political attack (Yermak IO) simultaneously demonstrates a sophisticated and centralized strategic command.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains high at the tactical level, but the operational posture is severely strained by the simultaneous kinetic and political attacks. Immediate C2 integrity is the primary constraint.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: UAF deep strike operations are sustained and penetrating (Confirmed strikes on targets in Saratov). This maintains psychological pressure on the RF rear.
• CRITICAL SETBACK: The confirmed anti-corruption raids targeting the Head of the Presidential Office represent the most significant immediate setback, creating profound political uncertainty and immediately degrading the credibility of the strategic C2 apparatus under fire.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The CRITICAL DEFICIENCY remains mobile C-UAS/EW/SHORAD protection for the QRF GLOC against KAB/UAV attack. An equally critical constraint is the necessity to rapidly stabilize the strategic C2 structure against the IO weaponization of the Yermak searches.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• CRITICAL DECEPTION/DEGRADATION: The confirmed NABU/SAP searches targeting Yermak are being utilized as a foundational narrative by RF IO (e.g., "Zelensky's puppet master under investigation"). This immediately transitions from disinformation to weaponized truth, aiming to convince domestic and international audiences that Kyiv's leadership is corrupt, distracted, and unable to govern during wartime.
• Narrative Reinforcement: RF IO continues to amplify statements regarding NATO/EU preparing for war, justifying preemptive action, and using domestic disasters (Sakhalin) to absorb attention away from war reporting within Russia.

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic morale is facing a critical challenge, simultaneously absorbing the high kinetic threat (Huliaipole, KAB strikes) and the profound internal political instability signaled by the Yermak searches. Transparency and rapid, authoritative messaging are required to prevent widespread confidence erosion.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The Orban meeting combined with the sudden C2 crisis (Yermak) maximizes the RF's leverage, enabling Moscow to present Ukraine as unstable and ungovernable, potentially influencing undecided allies or exacerbating EU/US friction.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Full Synchronization and Tactical/Cognitive Overmatch (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Huliaipole Assault: RF Vostok Group commences mechanized assault 280730Z, aiming for a 5-8 km penetration, utilizing saturation fires and possibly specialized assets (Kurier robotics) to breach hardpoints.
2. Kinetic Interdiction: RF continues KAB strikes on the QRF GLOC, maximizing delay and attrition until at least 281000Z.
3. IO Escalation: RF media leverages the Yermak investigation status NLT 280900Z, likely predicting further arrests or linking the scandal to military procurement fraud, aiming to reduce international confidence ahead of the Orban-Putin statement (NLT 281200Z).

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: C2 Paralysis Leading to Operational Collapse (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. The Yermak investigation escalates rapidly (e.g., formal arrest or immediate resignation), leading to a perception of fractured authority within the Presidency and military chain of command.
2. This C2 paralysis inhibits the decisive, timely release and maneuvering of the UAF operational QRF, allowing the RF Vostok Group to achieve a critical operational breakthrough (10+ km) at Huliaipole by 281000Z.
3. The combined tactical defeat and political chaos force key Western allies (Germany/France) to publicly call for an immediate, conditional ceasefire, effectively neutralizing the Ukrainian strategic position.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. C2 AND STRATEGIC STABILITY (NCA/J2/J3)

• ACTION (CRITICAL - C2 STABILIZATION): The National Command Authority (NCA) must issue an immediate, highly visible statement (NLT 280800Z) explicitly confirming that operational military command remains centralized under the Commander-in-Chief and unaffected by ongoing domestic legal proceedings. Frame the NABU/SAP action as evidence of democratic strength, not weakness, to neutralize RF IO.
  • Confidence: HIGH
• ACTION (IO COUNTER-ATTACK): Immediately direct IO assets to leverage the confirmed UAF deep strikes (e.g., Saratov target damage) to shift the domestic and international narrative away from the Yermak incident and toward continued UAF offensive capability.

2. FORCE PROTECTION & COUNTER-INTERDICTION (J3/Fire Command)

• ACTION (QRF SURVIVABILITY): Reiterate the CRITICAL requirement for dynamic routing, EMCON, and deployment of EW/SHORAD assets to the QRF GLOC. Given the persistent KAB threat, commanders must prioritize survival and delay over speed if kinetic resistance is encountered.
• ACTION (COUNTER-ROBOTICS TTP): Disseminate tactical intelligence on the confirmed deployment of the NTRK Kurier Ground Robotic Complex. Forward units at Huliaipole must immediately integrate specialized ATGM or heavy machine gun fire TTPs against small, armored mobile platforms.
  • Collection Requirement: P2 (Kurier performance data)

3. DIPLOMATIC COUNTER-MEASURES (MFA/NCA)

• ACTION (DIPLOMATIC TRIAGE): Reiterate the necessity of the pre-planned joint diplomatic response with Poland/UK NLT 281300Z to preemptively delegitimize any joint statements arising from the Orban-Putin meeting. Ensure messaging directly addresses and rejects the concept of "unilateral mediation" or "conditional aid."

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS