Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) – OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE (HULIAIPOLE AXIS)

TIME: 280600Z NOV 25

---

SUBJECT: Confirmation of Enhanced RF Counter-Reserve Targeting Protocols and Strategic Communications Response.

SUMMARY: The Russian Federation (RF) main assault on the Huliaipole Axis remains imminent (NLT 280800Z). New intelligence confirms RF Information Operations (IO) are actively weaponizing the movement of Ukrainian Quick Reaction Forces (QRFs) from Dnipropetrovsk by selectively identifying and characterizing these units. This operationalized propaganda provides legal and psychological cover for increased RF kinetic interdiction efforts against UAF reserves, notably by the newly deployed "Mangas" heavy hexacopters. UAF strategic communications are actively countering diplomatic IO regarding territorial concessions.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain The kinetic center of gravity remains the Huliaipole Defensive Belt (Zaporizhzhia Axis). RF Vostok Group is in final assembly. Operations are geographically constrained by RF deep interdiction efforts targeting the Konstantynivka GLOC and the reserve staging areas in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. A new, slow-moving UAV threat has been detected approaching Odesa/Hrybivka from the Black Sea, indicating sustained RF pressure on Southern C2 and logistics nodes.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations No change; conditions remain optimal for RF mechanized maneuver, kinetic preparation, and persistent UAV operations.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

1. UAF: Defenses are manned (Condition 1). QRF deployment from Dnipropetrovsk is underway, despite confirmed enemy interdiction, now amplified by focused RF IO (TASS, 04:17Z) naming specific units ('Aidar') to justify higher-intensity kinetic targeting of these reserve columns.
2. RF: Forces are postured for the main assault. Tactical air and ISR assets, including the "Mangas" heavy hexacopter, are integrated into assault elements. RF AD posture remains heightened (SAR Score 13.88).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA)

RF intent is an operational breakthrough at Huliaipole NLT 0800Z, synchronized with effective counter-reserve operations.

• Counter-Reserve Protocol (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has activated a new, targeted IO campaign (TASS, 04:17Z) to stigmatize UAF QRF units moving through Dnipropetrovsk. This indicates enhanced RF ISR capability to track and identify these formations and signals RF intent to utilize maximum available kinetic force (precision strike, heavy UAV, Spetsnaz) against these convoys, justifying potential high civilian/infrastructure collateral damage as targeting "extremist" units.
• Deep Strike Capability (NEW): The observed slow UAV ingress near Hrybivka (04:09Z) indicates continued stress testing of UAF SHORAD and potential targeting of port infrastructure or Southern C2/logistics hubs.
• RF Internal Control (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is increasing internal security measures (terrorism arrest in Altai, film censorship legislation NLT 01 MAR 26). This confirms RF C2 prioritizes domestic control and IO narrative shaping, utilizing significant state resources that could otherwise be allocated to the front line.

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status RF Vostok Group sustainment remains robust for the immediate assault. Deployment of new, specialized hardware ("Mangas") suggests a functional, prioritized logistics channel to support high-priority operations.

C. Command and Control Effectiveness RF C2 remains effective, demonstrated by the synchronization between tactical deployment (Mangas), kinetic preparation (KAB/TOS-2), and the strategic IO targeting of UAF reserve movement.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness Defensive posture is critical. QRF readiness is constrained by confirmed deep interdiction threats and the new, specific risk posed by the "Mangas" heavy drone (confirmed in previous SITREP).

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Strategic Communication): Head of Presidential Office, Yermak, explicitly stated that President Zelensky will not sign away territory for peace (04:30Z). This is a critical, timely strategic counter-narrative that directly neutralizes the RF IO exploitation of the previous US peace plan leak (LOW CONFIDENCE in diplomatic fracture risk, but HIGH CONFIDENCE in successful counter-IO).
• Setback (QRF Vulnerability): The naming of specific units in Dnipropetrovsk by TASS (04:17Z) confirms RF ISR has achieved actionable identification of UAF reserve movements, significantly increasing the probability of precision strikes against QRF GLOCs and staging areas.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints The P1 requirement for Counter-Mangas EW updates and TOS-2 BDA remains critical and time-sensitive. The primary constraint is the limited availability of dedicated mobile SHORAD/EW platforms to escort all QRF movements now under confirmed, specific enemy targeting.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns RF IO is executing a highly focused hybrid campaign:

1. Kinetic Justification (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The TASS report targeting the QRF movement (04:17Z) serves a dual purpose: discouraging QRF movement through psychological pressure and pre-justifying aggressive kinetic strikes on these targets to domestic and international audiences.
2. Strategic Narrative Stabilization (MITIGATED): Yermak's explicit denial of territorial concessions (04:30Z) provides a necessary, stabilizing counter-narrative against the RF-exploited diplomatic friction.

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors The UAF loss reported near the White House (04:20Z) will require appropriate sensitivity and official acknowledgement to prevent RF manipulation of the domestic morale narrative. The previous RF suicide narrative targeting Sumy requires continued, aggressive neutralization.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments The prompt high-level Ukrainian counter-statement (04:30Z) is mitigating the strategic threat of Western alliance fracture, but diplomatic coordination must continue to reaffirm unity ahead of the critical Huliaipole assault.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) MLCOA: Full Huliaipole Assault and High-Intensity QRF Interdiction (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Assault Execution: RF Vostok Group executes the full mechanized assault (NLT 0800Z).
2. Reserve Denial: RF utilizes the newly confirmed ISR advantage and targeted IO (04:17Z) to commit high-precision assets (missiles, Mangas heavy drones, enhanced Spetsnaz teams) against the identified UAF QRF movement corridors from Dnipropetrovsk, aiming to achieve kinetic effects and delay deployment by NLT 8 hours.
3. IO Amplification: RF releases tactical footage of the assault and successful interdiction/damage to QRF convoys NLT 281000Z.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) MDCOA: Precision Strike Neutralization of QRF Staging Area (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF leverages real-time intelligence gained from tracking QRF movement to execute a preemptive, synchronized deep strike (e.g., Iskander or high-volume Lancet/Mangas attack) on the confirmed QRF staging area prior to convoy dispersal. This would neutralize the primary UAF operational reserve, resulting in catastrophic tactical consequences for the Huliaipole defense.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. FORCE PROTECTION & COUNTER-INTERDICTION (J3/J2)

• ACTION (CRITICAL - QRF DISPERSION): Immediate De-Confliction and Dispersal. QRF commanders in Dnipropetrovsk must immediately cease using centralized staging areas identified in previous planning. Implement immediate tactical dispersal and utilize redundant, tertiary GLOCs for movement, minimizing concentration in high-risk zones subject to RF precision strike.
• ACTION (MANDATE EW/AD): Reinforce AD/EW Integration. Utilize dedicated mobile SHORAD/EW assets (as previously recommended) as screening elements 5-10 km ahead of the QRF main body to provide early warning and disruption against Mangas and other deep-strike UAVs.
• ACTION (TARGETING PRIORITY SHIFT): Add high-probability RF Spetsnaz/UAV C2 relay teams positioned along the Dnipropetrovsk GLOC to the P1/P2 dynamic targeting list, prioritizing them over static logistics targets due to the confirmed time-critical QRF movement.

2. FIRE SUPPORT & TARGETING (J3/Fire Command)

• ACTION (P1 BDA): Reaffirm BDA Deadline. All ISR assets must prioritize TOS-2 BDA NLT 280800Z. This is the last window for effective counter-battery fire before the assault climaxes.
• ACTION (Southern Air Defense): Increase vigilance and dedicate SHORAD assets to protect critical infrastructure around Odesa/Mykolaiv in response to the slow UAV track reported (04:09Z).

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION & COUNTER-IO (NCA/MFA)

• ACTION (IO COUNTER-PROTOCOL): Neutralize Stigmatization Narrative. The UAF General Staff (UGS) must issue a strong, rapid statement clarifying that all forces deploying to the front, regardless of unit history, are integrated UAF professional units. Explicitly denounce RF characterizations (e.g., 'Aidar' labeling) as war crimes propaganda intended to justify indiscriminate attacks on moving personnel.
• ACTION (Diplomatic Strategy): Leverage Yermak's statement (04:30Z) in immediate diplomatic outreach to EU/US partners, reinforcing Ukrainian resolve against territorial concessions to stabilize political risk and secure sustained aid commitment ahead of the Huliaipole battle.

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS