Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) – OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE (ZAPORIZHZHIA AXIS)

TIME: 280200Z NOV 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain The operational center of gravity (CoG) remains fixed on the Zaporizhzhia Axis (Huliaipole). RF forces are postured for an imminent mechanized assault designed to achieve a rapid operational breakthrough. Key terrain control pivots on preventing RF penetration past the current Forward Line of Troops (FLOT) and securing the main Ground Lines of Communication (GLOCs) feeding the sector. The Pokrovsk Axis is confirmed as an operational loss (Presumed Total Encirclement).

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations Current conditions (pre-dawn, limited visibility) continue to favor RF small-unit infiltration and persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) via UAVs. Confirmed UAF sighting of a RF UAV in the Southern Mykolaiv region (01:06Z) moving westward validates the RF strategy of exploiting low-light conditions for final tactical targeting and probing the Western flank.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

1. Huliaipole: UAF assets are engaged in Pre-Emptive Counter-Preparation (PCP) fires. The core RF kinetic threat is the 35th Army (Vostok Group).
2. Pokrovsk: Fragmented Defense Protocols (FDP) remain authorized, shifting command structure toward decentralized breakout operations towards Myrnograd.
3. Northern Axis (Kharkiv): RF "Sever" Group confirmed execution of a guided aerial bomb (KAB) strike on a UAF concentration area in Vilcha (01:31Z). This activity fixes UAF reserves in the North and prevents reallocation south. (FACT)
4. Rear Area Security: RF Spetsnaz teams maintain interdiction pressure on the Konstiantynivka GLOC.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action RF primary intention is to achieve a decisive tactical breakthrough at Huliaipole NLT 280600Z, simultaneously maximizing the diplomatic exploitation of the Pokrovsk loss.

• Capabilities: RF maintains high kinetic capability, focused on the use of Thermobaric systems (TOS-2) for breach and sustained KAB saturation. RF has demonstrated the capability to conduct coordinated kinetic operations across multiple domains (Ground Assault + Northern Fixing + Deep Rear Area Interdiction).
• Recent Tactical Adaptations: RF AD activity remains elevated (1488th Regt SAR spike), indicating proactive defense of high-value C2/logistics supporting the Huliaipole thrust. This adaptation mitigates UAF deep strike effectiveness.

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status RF sustainment ability remains robust enough to support the Huliaipole assault package. The necessity to reposition AD assets to counter UAF deep strikes (confirmed by SAR spike) confirms a vulnerability that UAF kinetic operations are successfully exploiting, albeit at a high opportunity cost for RF.

C. Command and Control Effectiveness RF C2 remains effective, particularly in the Information Environment (IE), utilizing state media (TASS) and official organs (Presidential statements) to coordinate military action with strategic diplomatic messaging (e.g., maximizing the friction caused by the US peace proposal leak). (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Readiness: High alert status in Zaporizhzhia. PCP fires are in progress. The UAF capability for deep strike operations is confirmed by the successful penetration of UAVs into Moscow air space (01:27Z), despite the subsequent interception. (FACT)
• Resource Strain: Resources are critically strained due to the need to concurrently: (1) Defend Huliaipole, (2) Manage the Pokrovsk extraction, and (3) Dedicate QRFs to clear the Konstiantynivka GLOC against RF Spetsnaz. The confirmed RF strike on UAF concentration in Vilcha (Kharkiv) further pressures Northern axis defense requirements.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: UAF maintains the initiative in the deep strike domain, forcing RF to commit AD resources to rear areas.
• Setback: The imminent threat of the Huliaipole assault is compounded by the necessity to defend Mykolaiv (UAV sighting), diverting crucial Southern AD assets that are required for frontline protection against KAB/Air support. (JUDGMENT - MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Critical Requirement: Immediate ISR confirmation and targeting of RF TOS-2 systems.
• Constraint: Limited operational reserves are currently fixed by RF interdiction (Konstiantynivka) and Northern pressure (Vilcha strike).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns RF Information Operations (IO) have intensified, focusing on three vectors:

1. War Crimes Allegations: RF affiliated organizations ("International Public Tribunal") are amplifying video testimonies alleging UAF "Neonazi" crimes.
2. Western Disillusionment: RF state media is actively promoting narratives of Westerners (e.g., ex-US LE officers) moving to Russia, framing Russia as a superior moral and political destination.
3. NATO Paranoia: RF state media is reporting (via sources like Der Spiegel) about numerous suspicious drone flights over German military sites, attempting to sow distrust within the alliance regarding internal security. (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE)

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors Morale is severely tested by the Pokrovsk loss. RF IO is poised to weaponize expected visual evidence (POWs/Equipment) within the next 12 hours. UAF FDP execution is critical for stabilizing unit cohesion by maximizing force preservation.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments The critical alliance fissure identified in the previous report is being actively widened by Moscow.

• NEW DEVELOPMENT (FACT): The report of a secretive meeting between Putin and Hungarian PM Orbán (01:30Z) directly attempts to bypass EU consensus and exploit the rift created by the US peace plan leak.
• Analysis: Dempster-Shafer analysis confirms a growing belief mass dedicated to the hypothesis of "Disagreement on Policy towards Russia between Hungary and EU/NATO allies" (0.0728). This signifies that diplomatic isolation attempts are highly active and immediately threatening logistical stability (MDCOA). (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) MLCOA: Coordinated Kinetic Breakthrough & Strategic Diplomatic Isolation (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Assault Execution: RF initiates the Huliaipole mechanized assault (utilizing TOS-2 and KAB saturation) NLT 280600Z.
2. Tactical Objective: RF achieves a penetration of 5-10 km, requiring immediate commitment of local UAF reserves.
3. Strategic Objective: RF utilizes the Putin-Orbán meeting and the Pokrovsk visual evidence release (NLT 281400Z) to amplify diplomatic pressure during the subsequent NATO/EU debates, aiming to slow or freeze key logistical support decisions.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) MDCOA: Southern Collapse and Logistical Paralysis (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a rapid, deep breakthrough at Huliaipole (15+ km penetration) due to successful saturation and the effective fixing of UAF reserves (Konstiantynivka/Vilcha). This collapse forces a broad operational withdrawal in the Southern Donbas. Simultaneously, the diplomatic maneuver (Orbán meeting) successfully precipitates a temporary logistical freeze (e.g., fuel or high-caliber ammunition shipments) NLT 281800Z, crippling UAF ability to stabilize the new defensive line.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. FIRE SUPPORT & TARGETING (J3/Fire Command)

• ACTION: Priority 1 Intelligence Gap remains the location of TOS-2 systems west of Huliaipole. Re-task all available ISR assets to the designated sectors NLT 280400Z. Failure to suppress these assets significantly increases the probability of a deep RF breakthrough.
• ACTION: Maintain continuous monitoring and targeting readiness for RF concentration areas in the Northern Axis (e.g., Vilcha area) to disrupt the RF fixing strategy and prevent further resource diversion from the South.

2. FORCE PROTECTION & LOGISTICS SECURITY (J3/J4)

• ACTION: Immediately prioritize the allocation of limited QRFs and anti-infiltration teams to aggressively sweep and neutralize RF Spetsnaz along the Konstiantynivka GLOC. Goal: Restore operational freedom of movement for UAF reserves NLT 280800Z.
• ACTION: Enhance local air defense (AD) readiness specifically against low-altitude threats (UAVs) in the Mykolaiv/Western Kherson axis to prevent RF ISR from fixing Western flank resources or conducting further tactical targeting.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION & DIPLOMACY (NCA/MFA)

• ACTION: IMMEDIATE STRATEGIC COUNTERMEASURE REQUIRED. Leverage PM Shmyhal’s NATO visit to coordinate a high-level, unified statement (with Germany/France/US) that explicitly addresses the threat of "uncoordinated diplomatic maneuvers" and affirms long-term, unconditional support for Kyiv, directly neutralizing the effect of the Putin-Orbán meeting.
• IMPACT: Directly targets the MDCOA pathway of logistical paralysis caused by diplomatic fissure.

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS