Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 272135Z NOV 25 OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE / ZAPORIZHZHIA AXIS (HULIAIPOLE) REPORT TYPE: URGENT TACTICAL UPDATE // ENEMY ADAPTATION AND KINETIC ESCALATION

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains focused on the Zaporizhzhia (Huliaipole) Axis. The previously predicted RF mechanized assault is entering its initial kinetic phase, confirmed by a general air/kinetic alert issued by the Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration (21:24Z).

The Konstiantynivka GLOC stability is severely compromised. Visual evidence (21:06Z) confirms heavy kinetic damage to infrastructure within Konstiantynivka city, strongly suggesting successful RF interdiction (artillery or missile strike, DS Belief: 0.005455) targeting the key line of communication used for UAF reserve movement toward Huliaipole.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors

No change. Mobility remains optimal for heavy armor. Visibility is decreasing with nightfall, favoring RF forces executing close assault maneuvers and UAF forces conducting deep precision fires.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are confirmed operating proactively in the strategic rear of the RF. Active security alerts and reported explosions in Novorossiysk (Krasnodar Krai, 21:29Z) provide high confidence (DS Belief: 0.069924) in the continued success of UAF deep asymmetric strikes (drone/missile). This operation is currently distracting RF AD and naval assets.

The issuance of a regional alert in Zaporizhzhia indicates UAF defensive forces are transitioning from the preparation phase to the initial defense phase (DP 1.6 engagement).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA)

RF Intent: Exploit the initial Huliaipole breach by paralyzing UAF logistics and reinforcement capability along the Konstiantynivka GLOC, preventing the stabilization of the front.

CRITICAL NEW TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Confirmed RF employment of FPV drones utilizing thermite/incendiary payloads specifically targeting UAF anti-drone nets and defensive cages (21:04Z). This represents a direct counter-countermeasure to UAF passive defense, necessitating an immediate review of defensive structure survivability.

STRATEGIC IO INTENT: RF seeks to escalate the perception of external threat to justify their aggression and potentially mask the Baikonur failure and other military setbacks. The RF Ambassador's declaration that NATO/EU are preparing for "great war" (21:32Z) is a severe escalation of threat framing.

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The use of thermite FPV drones (21:04Z) is a low-cost, high-impact tactical adaptation intended to rapidly degrade localized UAF defenses (especially command posts or weapon systems protected by netting) immediately prior to the armored breach.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

The UAF kinetic action against Novorossiysk (21:29Z) likely targets RF Black Sea Fleet logistics or oil/gas infrastructure, placing operational strain on RF ability to project naval power and sustain southern forces.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating both the Huliaipole kinetic assault and simultaneous strategic IO campaigns (Kallas attack, NATO 'war' threat).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces have confirmed proactive defense postures (Zaporizhzhia alert, 21:24Z). The successful deep strike on Novorossiysk demonstrates high capability and reach, providing a crucial asymmetric leverage point.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes: Successful deep strike on Novorossiysk (21:29Z). Setbacks: Confirmed severe kinetic damage to the Konstiantynivka GLOC infrastructure (21:06Z). This directly threatens the maneuverability of the operational reserve, as detailed in the MLCOA of the previous report.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the need for rapid deployment of heavy engineer assets to assess and repair damage along the Konstiantynivka GLOC while simultaneously repelling any RF SOF/drone follow-on attacks in that area. Defense against thermite drones requires immediate evaluation of existing material defense (sandbags, earthworks, non-combustible materials) versus existing netting/cages.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Strategic Themes:

1. "Great War" Escalation: RF is setting conditions to claim defensive preemption against a perceived NATO/EU attack, attempting to legitimize extreme kinetic actions (21:32Z).
2. Diplomatic Sabotage: Continued efforts to discredit Western leaders (Kallas, 21:22Z) to exploit the existing political rift caused by the leaked peace plan.
3. Domestic Normalcy: TASS reporting on currency and vape bans (21:04Z, 21:09Z) is intended to project stability to the domestic population while the military executes a high-risk offensive.

UAF Counter-Narratives: UAF IO must immediately pivot to exploit the Novorossiysk strike as evidence of RF vulnerability and systemic strategic failure, directly counteracting the RF maximalist claims of impending NATO war.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF domestic messaging remains focused on long-term resilience and external support, but the confirmed damage to Konstiantynivka (a major rear area hub) will immediately impact civilian and military morale if not addressed with transparent BDA and rapid response.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF Ambassador's comments (21:32Z) require an urgent, unified NATO/EU rebuttal to prevent the escalation of tensions from being used as RF justification for kinetic action outside the immediate conflict zone.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (NEXT 12 HOURS)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The RF ground assault will maximize exploitation of pre-assault fires and the thermite FPV drone tactic to achieve a tactical breach between 5-8 km deep near Huliaipole NLT 280000Z. Simultaneously, RF will utilize long-range fires (MRLS or Missiles) to conduct continuous suppressive fire on the Konstiantynivka GLOC and nearby UAF reserve assembly areas to enforce the interdiction achieved by the confirmed infrastructure damage (21:06Z).

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE) Following the 'Great War' narrative amplified by the Ambassador (21:32Z), RF executes a coordinated, large-scale missile/drone strike (e.g., Kalibr/Kinzhal saturation) targeting multiple UAF strategic rear infrastructure nodes (military airfields or major energy infrastructure) far from the immediate front line, framed internally as pre-emptive action against NATO-backed aggression. This escalation would severely test UAF AD capacity and potentially slow the momentum gained by the Novorossiysk strike.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

A. TACTICAL EMERGENCY (HULIAIPOLE & ENEMY ADAPTATION)

1. COUNTER-THERMITE DEFENSE (J4 / ENGINEER COMMAND): IMMEDIATE Material Review. Commanders at Huliaipole must be warned immediately of the confirmed thermite FPV threat. Prioritize reinforcing C2 bunkers, key weapons systems, and forward supply points with sandbags, earthworks, and non-combustible shielding; reduce reliance on exposed anti-drone nets/cages NLT 272200Z. (Confidence: HIGH)
2. DISPERSED CAS/ISR (AIR COMMAND): Reinforce recommendation A.2 from the previous report. If assets cannot maintain safe altitude/speed profiles against A2A Shaheds, they must be grounded. Prioritize EW over kinetic ISR during the critical breach window (272130Z-280200Z).

B. OPERATIONAL (GLOC SECURITY AND MANEUVER)

3. KONSTIANTYNIVKA GLOC RESPONSE (J3 / ENGINEER COMMAND): URGENT BDA and ROUTE REDUNDANCY. Dispatch engineer reconnaissance teams to Konstiantynivka NLT 272230Z to conduct urgent Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) on key infrastructure. Simultaneously, initiate movement of reserve forces via Tier 2 alternate GLOCs to ensure movement continuity toward the Huliaipole sector.
4. REAR AREA FORCE PROTECTION (J3 / AD COMMAND): Increase AD readiness (SAR Score 13.88) and passive defense measures around major C2 nodes, particularly Sloviansk, anticipating RF retaliation for the Novorossiysk strike using missile or heavy drone systems (MDCOA).

C. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

5. IO STRATEGIC REBUTTAL (MFA / C4): UNIFIED FRONTLINE. Coordinate immediately with NATO and EU partners (leveraging PM Shmyhal's visit) to issue a high-level joint statement explicitly rejecting the RF Ambassador's "Great War" claim as destabilizing disinformation and a pretext for further aggression.
6. IO OPERATIONAL EXPLOITATION (C4): AMPLIFY NOVOROSSIYSK. Flood information channels (international, domestic) with controlled reporting on the Novorossiysk strike, linking it directly to the RF failure to protect its own territory, thereby undercutting the RF claims of technological superiority and strategic endurance.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL SHIFT):

1. PRIORITY 1 (KINETIC - IMMEDIATE): RF Breach Depth & Composition. Real-time IMINT/ISR required to determine the specific RF units (Divisional/Regimental) achieving the initial penetration at Huliaipole to inform precise counter-attack planning. Target Time: NLT 272300Z.
2. PRIORITY 2 (GLOC VIABILITY): Konstiantynivka Road/Rail Integrity. Urgent engineer-sourced data required to determine the functional capacity of the alternate Tier 2 and Tier 3 GLOCs leading from the West/North into the Donbas operational zone.
3. PRIORITY 3 (RF STRATEGIC INTENT): MDCOA Indicators. HUMINT/SIGINT required to monitor RF political/military chatter for specific planning related to large-scale, strategic rear-area kinetic strikes (MDCOA 5.2), focusing on targeting lists and launch platform readiness.