Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 272106Z NOV 25 OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE / ZAPORIZHZHIA AXIS (HULIAIPOLE) REPORT TYPE: URGENT TACTICAL UPDATE // ASSAULT IMMINENT

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains dominated by the confirmed imminent Russian Federation (RF) mechanized assault on the Zaporizhzhia (Huliaipole) Axis, expected NLT 272200Z. No significant positional change is confirmed in the immediate vicinity of the impending breach within the last hour.

Positional fighting near Krasny Liman (20:38Z) and continued heavy RF pressure in Vovchansk (20:57Z) confirm RF strategy is maintaining attrition and fixing UAF forces across secondary sectors, preventing maneuver reinforcement to the Huliaipole main effort.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors

No change. Ground mobility remains optimal for heavy RF mechanized forces.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are confirmed to be executing deep strike operations in RF territory (Dempster-Shafer belief: 0.35 for strikes on Crimea/Sevastopol airfields), supported by wide-area drone security advisories (20:41Z). This demonstrates a proportional response to the Huliaipole threat, utilizing asymmetric means to create disruption deep behind enemy lines.

The threat from RF use of Shahed/Geran drones in an Air-to-Air (A2A) hunting role is now fully confirmed and amplified by RF military commentators (20:48Z), indicating this is a deliberate, propagandized tactic to achieve local air denial during the assault phase.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA)

RF Intent: Achieve operational rupture at Huliaipole and deny UAF air reconnaissance/Close Air Support (CAS) critical to managing the breach.

KEY CAPABILITY REINFORCEMENT (AERIAL): RF media confirmation (20:48Z) of the Shahed/Geran A2A hunting tactic validates the previous assessment that UAF aircraft are now operating under significantly escalated risk near the front line. This tactic is specifically intended to enable the Huliaipole ground assault by blinding UAF ISR.

STRATEGIC IO SHIFT: RF milbloggers are testing a new narrative positioning Russia as the party willing to negotiate peace, but legally constrained by Kyiv ("Russia wants to agree... but legally it is currently impossible" - 20:46Z). This is a transparent attempt to pressure international mediators and exploit the recent US peace plan leak.

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation is the integration of A2A UAV hunting into the pre-assault kinetic shaping phase, underscoring RF commitment to achieving localized air superiority over the Huliaipole breach sector.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

A significant, non-kinetic strategic setback for RF was reported (20:52Z): a major technical failure at the Baikonur Cosmodrome, resulting in the loss of crewed spaceflight capability. While not kinetic, this degrades RF's projection of technological and strategic endurance, providing UAF an immediate Information Operations (IO) opportunity.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 appears centralized, with milbloggers deferring to the "Commander-in-Chief" (20:40Z) for strategic messaging, confirming tight control over the information domain simultaneous with the imminent kinetic assault.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains high, with evidence of localized offensive success:

• Artan GUR Unit (20:35Z): Confirmed capture of an enemy position and two prisoners. This provides a needed morale boost and reaffirms UAF special operations capability, offsetting the gravity of the Huliaipole situation.
• Deep Strike Operations: High belief mass for drone strikes on strategic RF assets (Crimea/Energy) suggests proactive military strategy to create disruption in the RF rear.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes: GUR position capture (20:35Z). Maintaining deep strike capability (20:41Z advisories). Setbacks: The operational window for Huliaipole stabilization is closing, and the critical threat (TOS-2 systems, A2A Shaheds) remains unmitigated by successful counter-preparation fires.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint remains the need for rapid adaptation of flight profiles and EW coverage to protect UAF air assets from the A2A Shahed threat, which is now kinetically validated.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Themes:

1. Negotiation Blame Shifting: RF attempts to appear diplomatic while blaming Kyiv for legal inflexibility (20:46Z).
2. Maximalist Victory: KPRF event promotes "complete and unconditional victory" (20:50Z), reinforcing the RF war aims.

UAF Counter-Narratives:

1. Localized Success and Resilience: GUR video showcasing captures (20:35Z).
2. RF Strategic Failure: Immediate reporting on the Baikonur failure (20:52Z) to undermine the technological superiority claim.
3. Internal Challenges: The high-profile release of a corruption suspect on bail (20:45Z) risks undermining public faith and resource mobilization efforts if not immediately managed by strategic communications.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF government focusing on long-term veterans planning (20:37Z) attempts to project post-war stability. This requires protection from RF IO attacks leveraging domestic issues like the "Midas" corruption case.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The immediate focus remains on managing the political fallout from the leaked peace plan (previous report). RF attempts to leverage this diplomatic friction are continuous.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (NEXT 12 HOURS)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The RF Vostok Group initiates the mechanized assault on the Huliaipole axis NLT 272200Z, preceded by heavy thermobaric/saturation fires. RF air defense and A2A Shahed platforms will execute coordinated suppression of UAF air assets (ISR/CAS) in the sector (Decision Point 2, NLT 272100Z). Simultaneously, RF IO will amplify images or drone footage of the Huliaipole breach to achieve maximum demoralization and tactical paralyzation in the immediate aftermath (NLT 280001Z).

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) A successful RF breakthrough at Huliaipole (5+ km deep) coincides with a strategic kinetic or interdiction strike (e.g., Kalibr/Shahed) targeting UAF logistic nodes in the Odesa region or along the Konstiantynivka GLOC, leveraging the perceived increase in UAF deep strike activity (Crimea/Energy) as pretext for escalation (21:00Z partisan commentary suggests this concern is active). This would decouple the eastern and southern fronts from critical resupply and reinforcement.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

A. TACTICAL EMERGENCY (HULIAIPOLE & AIR DEFENSE)

1. AIR DENIAL & FORCE PROTECTION (J6 / AIR COMMAND): IMMEDIATE Tier 1 EW ACTIVATION. Due to the confirmed and publicized nature of the Shahed A2A threat, EW assets must be redirected immediately (NLT 272115Z) to conduct maximum jamming/spoofing operations against all potential UAV control frequencies within 50km of the Huliaipole axis and the Konstiantynivka GLOC.
2. CAS/ISR PROFILE ADJUSTMENT (AIR COMMAND): All UAF air assets operating in the Zaporizhzhia axis must restrict operations to high-speed ingress/egress profiles and utilize terrain masking or fly above the effective ceiling of standard Shahed operations, or be grounded until effective AD/EW coverage is in place.
3. FORWARD DEFENSE (J3): Reiterate to all commanders at Huliaipole: The priority is Force Preservation through Dispersion (DP 1.6), not holding rigid terrain features against thermobaric saturation. Confirmation of RF armor penetration must trigger synchronized, layered indirect fire responses, not attempts at linear defense.

B. OPERATIONAL (GLOC SECURITY)

4. RESERVE SECURITY (J3 / SSO): Enhance patrol density and thermal/counter-sniper coverage along the Konstiantynivka GLOC between 272100Z and 280600Z, focusing on preventing RF SOF from utilizing the darkness/pre-assault chaos to interdict reserve movement C2 nodes or key bridges.

C. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

5. IO COUNTER-ATTACK (C4/MFA): EXPLOIT BAJKONUR FAILURE. Immediately task military and diplomatic channels to amplify the RF space failure (Baikonur/crewed spaceflight loss) as evidence of systemic technological and institutional decay, directly contrasting RF claims of "inexhaustible strategic superiority" and technological success.
6. INTERNAL NARRATIVE MANAGEMENT (NCA / MOJ): Acknowledge the release of the corruption suspect (20:45Z) transparently, emphasizing that judicial processes are independent, while aggressively promoting the long-term national planning initiatives (veterans' programs, 20:37Z) to reinforce the narrative of long-term state stability and commitment to its citizens.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL SHIFT):

1. PRIORITY 1 (AERIAL KINETIC): SHAHED A2A Operational Envelope. Immediate SIGINT/ELINT required to determine the effective range, altitude ceiling, and control bandwidth of RF Shahed A2A missions to establish safe flight corridors for UAF CAS/ISR.
2. PRIORITY 2 (KINETIC - IMMEDIATE): RF Breach Depth. Real-time ISR required NLT 272230Z to confirm initial RF penetration depth at Huliaipole and identify the specific axes of RF exploitation to direct the maneuver reserve.
3. PRIORITY 3 (RF STRATEGIC INTENT): Black Sea Retaliation Signals. HUMINT/SIGINT required to monitor RF military and political chatter for indications of forthcoming kinetic escalation against Odesa/Black Sea ports, following UAF deep strikes.