Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 271105Z NOV 25

SUBJECT: CRITICAL THREAT ENVIRONMENT: HULIAIPOLE STABILIZATION CONFIRMED; MYRNOGRAD DEFENSE DETERIORATION; HIGH RISK OF STRATEGIC LOGISTICS STRIKE.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is highly dynamic, characterized by defensive success in preventing catastrophic operational penetration on the southern flank, balanced against confirmed territorial losses on the Donbas central axis.

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (HULIAIPOLE - FRAGILE): UAF forces conducted decisive intervention to prevent the immediate loss of Huliaipole, stabilizing the immediate front line (Source: DeepState, 10:41Z). However, RF forces (Vostok Grouping) are confirmed to be conducting active reconnaissance and precision targeting within the city limits via UAVs (tank destruction reported, 11:00Z). This indicates RF is positioned immediately adjacent to the primary defenses.
• Northern Donbas (MYRNOGRAD/DIMYTROV): RF MoD claims the "liberation" of 117 buildings in Dimytrov (Myrnograd) (11:00Z). This confirms that RF forces, having breached the Pokrovsk perimeter, are successfully exploiting the breach westward, threatening the operational isolation of remaining UAF forward positions and pressing the critical defensive lines west of Myrnograd.
• Krasnolymanske Direction: FPV drone activity is confirmed, indicating persistent RF pressure aimed at fixing UAF reserves in the north (11:02Z).

FACT: UAF successfully executed tactical intervention to stabilize Huliaipole. (Source: DeepState, 10:41Z) FACT: RF MoD claims control of 117 buildings in Dimytrov (Myrnograd). (Source: RF MoD, 11:00Z) JUDGMENT: RF intent to create a strategic flanking maneuver via Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has been delayed but not defeated; RF is shifting operational focus to consolidate Myrnograd gains while probing Huliaipole defenses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist. No immediate environmental factors mitigate the kinetic threat. RF C2 hardening continues (local internet control measures, 11:01Z).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The threat of the strategic strike window (NLT 271200Z) continues to constrain UAF C2 asset movement and AD allocation. Forces on the Myrnograd axis are actively executing withdrawal protocols (Fragmented Defense Protocols - FDP, as per previous SITREP recommendations). Priority is now allocated to preventing a rapid collapse of the Huliaipole sector.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF demonstrates robust, multi-domain synchronization across kinetic operations, IO, and strategic signaling.

• Kinetic Capability: RF maintains the capacity for sustained, coordinated ground pressure across two critical axes (Myrnograd exploitation and Huliaipole pressure) while employing precision assets (UAVs, anticipated strategic missiles).
• Strategic Intentions:
  1. Secure and consolidate the operational breakthrough in the Donbas (Myrnograd) to create a defensible forward line.
  2. Maintain high pressure on Huliaipole to force the commitment and attrition of UAF strategic reserves.
  3. Simultaneously execute the planned strategic deep strike (NLT 271200Z) to decapitate UAF logistics/C2 response capability.
• Information Warfare Integration: High-level RF officials (Stepanov, 11:00Z) are articulating long-term, non-negotiable territorial goals (Odesa, Mykolaiv), which, when juxtaposed with reports blaming UA leadership for delaying peace, aims to demonstrate RF confidence in eventual military success and destabilize internal UA political unity.

2.2. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, particularly in synchronizing external diplomatic messaging (EU confrontation threat, 10:47Z) with military actions. The decision to immediately claim Myrnograd gains (11:00Z) is a direct psychological counter to the successful Huliaipole defense stabilization (10:41Z). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Confirmed RF success in establishing long-range precision fires (Tornado-S in previous reports) and sustaining multiple axis offensives indicates adequate logistical throughput, likely supported by the recent GRAU arsenal surge detected yesterday.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains high, evidenced by the successful tactical stabilization near Huliaipole. However, the requirement to manage the Myrnograd withdrawal and simultaneously defend Huliaipole is straining remaining operational reserves and command capacity.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Operational): Prevention of the loss of Huliaipole city center and adjacent GLOCs (10:41Z). Successful counter-battery fire reported in the South (10:47Z).
• Setback (Territorial): Confirmed continued loss of ground in the Myrnograd area (117 buildings claimed).
• Setback (Morale/Hybrid): The reported charges against the TCC official for abuse (11:00Z) fuels the ongoing RF psychological operation ("Mindichgate") aimed at delegitimizing mobilization and military authority.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Reserve Allocation: The critical decision on whether to commit strategic reserves to definitively hold the Huliaipole axis, or reserve them for the deep defense of Dnipropetrovsk, is imminent.
2. Internal Legitimacy: Urgent need for a unified STRATCOM/Legal response to counter the negative impact of TCC misconduct reports on mobilization and troop morale.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF narrative has crystallized into three synchronized themes:

1. Annexation Ambition: Public declaration of intent to seize Odesa and Mykolaiv ("next stage," 11:00Z).
2. Peace Negotiation Sabotage: Amplification of Western media claiming UA leadership is politically motivated to reject peace (10:46Z, 10:55Z).
3. Internal Distrust: Weaponization of genuine internal accountability issues (TCC abuse, 11:00Z) to erode trust in military leadership and mobilization efforts.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal communications efforts (UZ rail expansion, 10:43Z) attempt to project stability, but the successful amplification of TCC misconduct and the severity of the Myrnograd situation pose a significant immediate threat to public support for the war effort. RF diplomatic escalations (Poland consulate closure, 11:02Z) reinforce the perception of escalating conflict.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF is actively framing the conflict as an inevitable confrontation between Russia and the EU (10:47Z). Ukraine's continued diplomatic engagement (US negotiation team, Philippines meeting) is crucial to countering the RF narrative of unilateral aggression. The potential for US political shifts (Finnish 'golf diplomacy,' 10:50Z) introduces uncertainty regarding sustained long-term support.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

RF will utilize combined arms to pressure the Huliaipole sector while ensuring the tactical consolidation of Myrnograd.

• Ground (Focus Shift): RF shifts the tactical center of gravity to securing the Myrnograd/Dimytrov area, establishing operational fire control over remaining UAF extraction routes (MLCOA is completion of Myrnograd control NLT 271600Z). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Ground (Huliaipole): RF will continue high-intensity fires and UAV/FPV operations against Huliaipole to force UAF tactical errors or draw reserves, stopping short of a massed infantry assault until Myrnograd is fully secured. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Kinetics (Decapitation): The planned strategic deep strike against logistics (Poltava/Kremenchuk) remains the highest priority RF action NLT 271200Z. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

A rapid, successful RF assault breaches the stabilized Huliaipole defenses, coinciding precisely with a successful RF precision strike on the UAF General Staff main C2 node or a primary logistics hub.

• Outcome: Fragmentation of the Southern Command while simultaneous logistical collapse prevents timely redeployment or resupply, leading to the rapid advance of RF Mobile Groups (MGs) toward the Dnipro River.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: IMMEDIATE HULIAIPOLE STABILIZATION AND MYRNOGRAD WITHDRAWAL (J3/J2)

1. Huliaipole Counter-Battery Priority: Shift counter-battery efforts from deep Tornado-S hunting to immediate counter-fire against RF artillery targeting Huliaipole defenses, using the stability window (10:41Z) to maximize attrition on the enemy's forward elements.
2. UAV/FPV Interdiction: Immediately deploy tactical EW assets to the Huliaipole sector to disrupt RF Vostok Grouping drone operations (11:00Z), mitigating precision threats against maneuver units and C2 nodes in the defense sector.
3. Myrnograd Extraction: Ensure Fragmented Defense Protocols (FDP) are fully implemented for units west of the Myrnograd claimed control area (11:00Z). Secondary defensive lines must be stocked and manned immediately.

R-2: CRITICAL C2 AND LOGISTICS DEFENSE (AD/LOGISTICS COMMAND)

1. Strategic Strike Contingency: Given the continued high threat NLT 271200Z, all logistics commands must implement emergency redundancy systems, utilizing decentralized smaller transfer points for essential supplies (fuel, high-value munitions) instead of reliance on primary hub facilities (Poltava/Kremenchuk).
2. C2 Dispersal: Ensure all J-staff and General Staff personnel are operating from protected, dispersed, and power-redundant alternate C2 nodes until the 1200Z strike window has clearly passed.

R-3: COUNTER-HYBRID AND MORALE PROTECTION (STRATCOM/LEGAL)

1. TCC Abuse Mitigation (CRITICAL): STRATCOM must immediately circulate the Office of the General Prosecutor's report (11:00Z) internally and externally, framing it as proof of UAF institutional accountability and transparency, directly undermining the RF psychological operation.
2. Counter-Annexation Messaging: Issue a formal statement to international partners condemning the RF official's (Stepanov, 11:00Z) claim on Odesa and Mykolaiv as confirmation of RF maximalist, non-negotiable war goals, reinforcing the need for sustained military support.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS