Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 270700Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: HIGH KINETIC SATURATION CONFIRMED (142 DRONES LAUNCHED). ZAPORIZHZHIA GROUND PRESSURE INTENSIFIES WITH RF C-UAS ADAPTATIONS. CRITICAL RESERVE FORCE ACCOUNTABILITY REMAINS GAP.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is characterized by a high-intensity, widespread RF kinetic strike cycle followed by persistent localized ground pressure, especially on the Southern Axis.

• Deep Strike Vector (KINETIC CYCLE ENDED): UAF Air Force confirmed the Russian Federation (RF) launched 142 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in the recent wave (270636Z), significantly exceeding previous launch estimates. While 92 were neutralized, this scale confirms RF intent to overwhelm UAF Air Defense (AD) across the operational depth. Air threat warnings for ballistic weapons and general air alarms have been lifted in Zaporizhzhia and across central Ukraine (270653Z, 270654Z). The critical deep-flying UAV previously tracked toward Khmelnytskyi Oblast is assessed to have been either neutralized or diverted, given the lifting of general AD alerts. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Southern Front (INTENSE FIXATION): RF forces are confirming tactical efforts in the Zaporizhzhia region, focusing on Dobropillya. RF sources claim successful Counter-UAS (C-UAS) operations to protect advancing ground assault groups (270700Z). This corroborates previous reports of intense pressure on the Huliaipole/Zatishye sector. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Northeastern Fixation: RF continues ground combat operations and kinetic shaping near Volchansk (Kharkiv region) utilizing main battle tanks (T-80BVM), confirming RF intent to maintain multi-axis pressure to fix UAF reserves in the North/Northeast. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist across the front and the operational depth. Conditions favor ground maneuver and continued high-altitude ISR/kinetic operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF AD forces successfully mitigated the majority of the saturation strike (92/142). The immediate focus shifts from terminal defense to post-strike ISR to account for the remaining 50 assets and damage assessment. Control measures must prioritize immediate accounting and deployment of the previously designated CONPLAN DELTA reserve forces to the Zaporizhzhia Axis, as ground threat assessment remains high.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent remains to achieve synchronized tactical breakthroughs on the ground (Zaporizhzhia, Volchansk) while degrading UAF C2/Logistics capacity through massed kinetic attacks (142 UAV launch).

• Kinetic Saturation: RF possesses the capability and logistical capacity to launch massed drone strikes (in excess of 140 assets per wave) aimed at overwhelming layered AD systems. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactical Adaptation (C-UAS): RF forces are actively adapting physical ground tactics to mitigate UAF drone superiority. Video evidence confirms the widespread retrofitting of armored vehicles (BMP/MT-LB) with extensive anti-FPV drone screen/cage armor ("нарядных БМП") prior to deployment on assault axes. This signals an increased priority on protecting mobility and reducing FPV lethality. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Ground Intent: RF is focusing on protecting tactical advance groups on the Zaporizhzhia front (Dobropillya) using dedicated C-UAS/AD units. This confirms offensive intent to exploit gains (e.g., claimed capture of Zatishye). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF maintains a robust pipeline for mass-producing and deploying kinetic assets (drones). However, reliance on non-state fundraising for high-demand tactical gear for the Zaporizhzhia front (270702Z) suggests localized resource strain or a preference for rapid, decentralized procurement of specialized equipment. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, demonstrated by the synchronization of ground operations across multiple axes (Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia) and the coordinated timing of the massed drone strike cycle. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are in a defensive posture, focused on stabilizing the Southern front and maintaining deep defense integrity. Readiness is maintained by effective AD response (92 neutralizations).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: SSU 8th Regiment forces successfully engaged a Russian DRG on the Lyman Axis, capturing two prisoners and seizing valuable documents/equipment (270648Z). This provides immediate tactical intelligence and confirms UAF special operations effectiveness.
• Setback (STRATEGIC CONSTRAINT): The European Council decision to delay the "reparations credit" (financial aid) until December 18th introduces strategic financial uncertainty during a critical operational phase, impacting long-term resource planning. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Constraint 1 (CRITICAL): The status of the CONPLAN DELTA reserve force remains unconfirmed (Gap 1). This vital reserve is urgently required to counter the intensifying pressure on the Zaporizhzhia Axis. Constraint 2: UAF requires updated tactical doctrine to counter the newly observed, widespread RF anti-FPV armor adaptations.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations (IO) are deploying a multi-faceted narrative:

1. Western Instability: Exploiting domestic incidents in Western nations (e.g., US White House security incident involving a migrant) to portray Western society as unstable, justifying the conflict and discouraging US/EU support (270646Z, 270655Z).
2. Peace Pressure: Amplifying reports (NYT cited by RF sources) suggesting US is pressuring European allies toward a quick peace settlement, aiming to create internal doubts about the sustainability of Western support (270636Z).
3. Economic Resilience: Promoting narratives of rapid internal economic growth (returning foreign companies) to project stability and counter Western sanctions effectiveness (270701Z).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF public-facing messages are focused on maintaining high morale through commemoration and tribute (Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia OVA, 270658Z, 270659Z). The massed nature of the recent kinetic strike (142 launched) will temporarily increase anxiety in the operational depth, but the high neutralization rate mitigates severe morale impact.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The delay of the EU "reparations credit" (270648Z) is a strategic setback, demanding immediate diplomatic prioritization to secure alternative or bridging financing. Russian diplomatic signaling remains opaque regarding high-level US contacts (Ryabkov statement, 270650Z), emphasizing that Moscow controls the timeline for dialogue.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

RF forces will focus operational energy on consolidating control over settlements near Huliaipole/Zatishye (Zaporizhzhia Axis), utilizing massed anti-FPV protected armor and localized C-UAS superiority to achieve tactical momentum. This ground push will be supported by continued, albeit non-immediate, massed kinetic strikes (estimated next large strike wave NLT 271800Z) targeting logistics and energy infrastructure further east in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

RF achieves a successful penetration and rapid exploitation on the Zaporizhzhia Axis NLT 271200Z, specifically capturing the junction around Huliaipole due to the failure of UAF to deploy reserve forces (CONPLAN DELTA) rapidly enough. The resulting operational maneuver space forces a disorganized withdrawal of UAF elements toward the Dnipropetrovsk administrative boundary, creating a critical vulnerability in the defense of Central Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: CRITICAL FORCE ACCOUNTABILITY AND REDEPLOYMENT (J3)

1. Prioritize Gap 1 Resolution: J3 must immediately employ all available ISR assets (IMINT, HUMINT, SIGINT) to confirm the physical location and readiness of the CONPLAN DELTA reserve force NLT 270900Z.
2. Expedited Deployment: Once located, the reserve force must be placed on maximum readiness (DEFCON 3) and issued deployment orders targeting key defensive positions (e.g., GLOC intersections, strongpoints) West of the current contact line on the Zaporizhzhia Axis. The goal is to establish a hard defense NLT 271200Z.

R-2: TACTICAL ADAPTATION AND COUNTERMEASURES (J7 / AD COMMAND)

1. Anti-FPV Counter-Doctrine: J7 (Doctrine) must initiate immediate analysis and dissemination of counter-tactics against the widespread RF use of anti-FPV cage armor observed on BMP/MT-LB columns. This includes adjusting FPV delivery profiles, targeting soft points (e.g., tracks, optical sensors), and increasing reliance on artillery/loitering munitions. (Addresses RF tactical adaptation.)
2. Kinetic Strike Damage Assessment: AD Command must conduct an immediate post-strike audit comparing the 142 RF launch count against the 92 confirmed neutralizations. Focus collection efforts on potential impact zones for the 50 unaccounted-for assets to assess the effectiveness of RF decoy/saturation tactics and refine AD filter protocols.

R-3: STRATEGIC ISR FOCUS (J2)

1. Lyman Document Exploitation: Priority 1 tasking for HUMINT and SIGINT teams to immediately exploit the documents and captured personnel from the SSU success on the Lyman Axis (270648Z). Focus on identifying immediate RF operational plans, force structure (units), and high-value RF C2 locations.
2. Dobropillya/Zatishye Ground Truth: Maintain high-fidelity ISR (IMINT/Drone) over the Dobropillya sector to verify RF claims of advancing assault groups and C-UAS operations, ensuring reserve deployment (R-1.2) is optimally targeted.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS