Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261800Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: RF MAIN EFFORT EXPLOITATION SUSTAINED ON SOUTHERN AXIS. UAF C2 PRIORITIZES DOMESTIC AD PRODUCTION AND FORCE REPLENISHMENT RESTRUCTURE.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The overall operational posture remains CRITICAL (DEFCON 2) due to sustained RF exploitation and strategic vulnerability on the southern axis, compounded by acknowledged blue force structural constraints.

• Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk Axis (MAIN EFFORT): RF forces continue high-intensity kinetic action focused on widening the breach toward the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border (Huliaipole, Zatishye, Novopavlivka). RF claims counter-UAV success in the Krasnoarmeysk direction (west of Pokrovsk), confirming the movement of RF maneuver forces into the operational depth created by the Pokrovsk collapse.
• Central/Northern Fixation Axes: Confirmed movement of RF UAV groups (Shahed type, suspected) over the Poltava region (near Zinkiv), moving south (17:51Z). This activity fixes UAF AD assets needed for frontline support and keeps the threat of a deep precision strike (MDCOA) viable, despite the immediate kinetic focus in the South.
• Key Terrain: Defense of the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border remains the highest priority. The need for robust, layered AD, particularly small/medium range, is now officially acknowledged as a critical Stavka priority.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No significant environmental factors degrading offensive or defensive operations are reported. Conditions remain conducive for UAV and mechanized operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are focused on establishing secondary defensive lines along the threatened border and addressing systemic constraints via the Stavka (Supreme Command). Ukrainian drone units (e.g., 225th Separate Assault Detachment) continue to achieve localized tactical successes against RF personnel.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is to achieve operational maneuver freedom on the southern axis, capitalizing on the current UAF strain.

• Tactical Adaptation: RF is actively deploying and utilizing counter-UAS/EW assets (confirmed use by 30th Motorised Rifle Brigade, Tsentr Group) to protect advancing columns in the operational depth (Krasnoarmeysk direction). (HIGH CONFIDENCE). This is a crucial adaptation designed to neutralize the UAF's primary asymmetric advantage (FPV/ISR drones).
• Coercive Operations: RF continues to target civilian infrastructure and population centers (Zaporizhzhia district attack, 17:41Z) to degrade morale and compel UAF expenditure of resources on defense of non-military targets.
• Military Propaganda: RF MoD is highly effective at immediately reporting counter-UAS success to bolster internal morale and deflate UAF technological narratives.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift toward dedicated, synchronized counter-UAS operations in the deep battle area marks a critical adaptation by RF forces, directly challenging the UAF's primary method of attrition and reconnaissance.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Sufficient to support the current high operational tempo. The persistent UAV threat in the Central regions (Poltava) suggests RF strike and reconnaissance capabilities remain fully functional.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, demonstrated by the rapid deployment of counter-UAS assets alongside the kinetic exploitation and the continued synchronization with IO efforts.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture remains STRAINED but focused on strategic correction. The Stavka meeting (17:53Z) highlighted two core strategic vulnerabilities requiring immediate action:

1. Air Defense: Requirement to drastically increase domestic production of small and medium-range AD systems for both the front and energy defense.
2. Manpower: Urgent need to review and restructure the system for replenishing combat brigades, confirming critical force generation friction. (HIGH CONFIDENCE).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS: Confirmed successful drone strikes (225th Assault Detachment and Bytusov FPV footage), demonstrating retained tactical lethality of SBS units.
• SETBACK: The strategic necessity to urgently address systemic manpower and AD production issues confirms the sustained, high attrition rate and current dependence on external supply are unsustainable.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: Time and capacity to implement the Stavka directives regarding AD production and manpower restructuring while simultaneously defending against the southern RF breakthrough. Failure to rapidly address brigade replenishment (Zelenskyy reference) risks catastrophic morale decline (DS belief).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO continues to synchronize political/geopolitical messaging with kinetic successes.

• US/Negotiation Uncertainty: RF channels (Kotsnews, 17:45Z) are actively promoting the narrative of a pending peace proposal by Steven Witkoff, designed to sow distrust between Kyiv and international partners and create paralysis within the NCA regarding the diplomatic reliability of the US. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Discrediting the West: Extensive campaigns mocking the operational readiness of NATO allies (Poland's submarine failure) and promoting anti-Western/anti-aid narratives (Palestine/humanitarian conspiracies) to destabilize international coalition support.
• Domestic Resilience (RF): RF state media is actively counter-messaging internal threats (torture allegations, economic concerns regarding SberBank) to maintain internal cohesion, suggesting a vulnerability RF C2 is attempting to mask.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The Stavka's public acknowledgment of the need to review brigade replenishment, while necessary for long-term health, introduces immediate domestic morale risk if the process is not managed transparently. Counter-IO must focus on the newfound strategic commitment to domestic production and improved efficiency.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

International support remains focused on defense (German aid noted previously). The RF IO push regarding the Witkoff mission necessitates immediate counter-diplomacy to stabilize Western commitments.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF armored/mechanized elements, utilizing synchronized EW/Counter-UAS screens, will continue their aggressive push through the Zatishye–Novopavlivka corridor toward the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border. They will attempt to bypass UAF delay positions using these technological safeguards. UAV strikes will continue to fix AD assets in Central Ukraine (Poltava/Sumy) NLT 270800Z.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves localized air superiority over a defined sector of the Southern Axis through effective deployment of the new counter-UAS umbrella. They exploit this technological advantage to conduct a concentrated air assault or rapid mechanized penetration past established delay lines, targeting a high-value logistics node (e.g., Kryvyi Rih railhead) NLT 271200Z.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: COUNTER-UAS/EW RESPONSE (J2/J3/SBS COMMAND)

1. EW Counter-Tactics Development: Immediately task the Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS) and dedicated SIGINT units (J2) to prioritize intelligence collection (ELINT/IMINT) on the operational signature and capabilities of newly deployed RF counter-UAS systems (e.g., FSTH-LD). Develop and disseminate new drone attack vectors (e.g., saturation attacks, flight path deviations) NLT 270000Z.
2. INTERDICTION REPRIORITIZATION: Shift high-value interdiction fires (HIMARS, ATACMS) to target confirmed or suspected RF EW/Counter-UAS nodes operating forward of the main mechanized columns in the Zatishye–Novopavlivka corridor. Neutralizing the RF counter-UAS shield is now the critical kinetic enabler.

R-2: FORCE GENERATION AND STRATEGIC PRODUCTION (NCA/J1/J4)

1. BRIGADE REPLENISHMENT TASK FORCE: J1 (Personnel) and the Chief of General Staff must immediately establish a dedicated task force to redesign the brigade replenishment system, prioritizing stabilization of existing combat brigades over new formation standing. Provide transparent communication regarding the restructuring process to frontline units.
2. DOMESTIC AD ACCELERATION: J4 (Logistics) must synchronize with the Ministry of Defense to accelerate the financing and production timelines for small and medium-range domestic AD systems, as directed by Stavka. This must be treated as a strategic materiel priority equivalent to deep strike capabilities.

R-3: COGNITIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTER-IO (NCA/J2 IO)

1. NEGATION OF WITKOFF NARRATIVE: NCA must issue a rapid, authoritative statement rejecting the validity and relevance of the alleged "Witkoff peace mission," framing it explicitly as an RF information operation designed to exploit UAF battlefield stress and compromise Western diplomatic unity.
2. NARRATIVE PIVOT: Utilize the Stavka focus on domestic AD production and manpower efficiency as a core counter-narrative, shifting public focus from immediate losses to long-term national resilience and self-reliance, thereby neutralizing the RF IO focus on Western dependence.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS