Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261730Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: RF MAIN EFFORT EXPLOITATION WIDENS ON SOUTHERN AXIS. C2 VULNERABILITY REMAINS CRITICAL.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational posture remains CRITICAL (DEFCON 2) due to the sustained RF exploitation on the southern axis and ongoing internal command constraints.

• Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk Axis (MAIN EFFORT): RF forces are widening the exploitation vector following the Pokrovsk collapse. Intelligence confirms sustained, high-intensity kinetic action focused around Huliaipole and the disputed area of Zatishye, with specific reports highlighting fighting in the vicinity of Novopavlivka (Rybar analysis, 17:29Z). This validates the assessment that RF intends to roll up the southern flank and breach the Dnipropetrovsk administrative boundary.
• Northern Fixation Axes (SUSTAINED PRESSURE): RF kinetic activity continues to fix UAF Air Defense (AD) assets. Confirmed movement of multiple Russian UAV groups (Shahed type, suspected) in the Sumy region (near Bilopillia/Terny) moving southwest (17:04Z). Secondary UAV activity reported in Kharkiv (Izium) moving eastward (17:30Z).
• Key Terrain: The defense of the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border and the protection of logistics hubs in Kryvyi Rih/Poltava remain the highest priorities. The Head of the Kryvyi Rih Defense Council (Vilkul, 17:07Z) confirms high-level regional readiness.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

Current environmental conditions remain conducive for offensive mechanized maneuver and high-intensity kinetic fires, particularly drone operations. No significant weather degradation affecting operations is projected through 270600Z.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are prioritizing the execution of Fragmented Defense Protocols (FDPs) and the rapid stabilization of the southern operational flank. The 10th Separate Mountain Assault Brigade (OGShBr) confirms the successful shoot-down of an RF Granat-4 reconnaissance UAV (17:06Z), indicating localized tactical success against RF ISR capability. UAF strategic C2 continues to operate under heightened security constraints following the identified communications vulnerability.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is to translate the tactical victory at Pokrovsk into operational maneuver through the Zaporizhzhia axis (Zatishye/Novopavlivka).

• Tactical Focus: The concentrated effort on Novopavlivka confirms RF is attempting to widen the breach area significantly, creating operational depth rather than focusing solely on the narrowest route. RF reconnaissance assets (Colonelcassad report in Donbas, 17:20Z) are actively surveying UAF defenses to support this advance. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Coercive Operations: RF continues the synchronization of military operations with attacks on civilian targets (Kostiantynivka apartment block strike, 17:17Z), aimed at degrading morale and compelling UAF resource expenditure on non-military security.
• Logistics/Sustainment: RF logistics appear sufficient to support the offensive thrust. Recruitment efforts remain robust (as per previous report). RF IO platforms are confirming efforts to consolidate domestic support (Dva Mayora and Chicherina’s "ZARYA" video promotion, 17:08Z).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF maintains a multi-domain approach: kinetic exploitation in the South, fixation/AD suppression in the North (Sumy UAVs), and high-tempo information operations targeting UAF command legitimacy and international support.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Sufficient to sustain the current operational tempo. The long-term impact of UAF deep strikes against Russian territory (TASS claim of 12 UAVs shot down, 17:26Z) is assessed as high on RF domestic security perception, but low on immediate front-line sustainment capability.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, demonstrated by the rapid and synchronized shift in the main effort from Pokrovsk consolidation to Zaporizhzhia exploitation.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture remains STRAINED/DEFENSIVE. The immediate priority is the establishment of delay positions and secondary defensive lines on the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border.

• Force Generation: The persistent, high-volume recruitment drive for the Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS) (15,000 positions advertised since late October) highlights the UAF strategic commitment to drone warfare as the primary asymmetric capability against RF mass and attrition tactics. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Local C2 Resilience: Localized defense commands (Kryvyi Rih) are confirming high readiness, which is crucial for managing the immediate threat of penetration.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS: Shootdown of the Granat-4 reconnaissance drone (10th OGShBr).
• SUCCESS: Confirmation of €170M German aid for energy infrastructure (17:14Z), partially neutralizing the strategic objective of RF infrastructure targeting.
• SETBACK: Continued high casualties and loss of territory on the eastern flank.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The critical constraint is the time required to mobilize and deploy sufficient, equipped maneuver forces to the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border before RF achieves operational maneuver space past Zatishye/Novopavlivka.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is leveraging tactical success to amplify strategic uncertainty.

• IO Synchronization: The release and widespread promotion of the pro-war music video "ZARYA" by high-profile Russian military bloggers (17:08Z) serves to solidify domestic support for the conflict narrative precisely when kinetic actions are peaking.
• US Alignment Subversion: Speculation regarding a new, Trump-aligned US negotiation envoy (Dan Driscoll, 17:05Z) is designed to create anxiety and paralysis within Kyiv regarding the long-term reliability of Western support, particularly when combined with the C2 leak narrative. This is a direct attack on strategic decision-making confidence. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Civilian Morale: The Kostiantynivka strike documentation will be weaponized by RF sources to demonstrate UAF inability to protect civilian population centers.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic morale remains fragile following the Pokrovsk loss and under pressure from synchronized RF information operations. Counter-IO narratives must urgently address the perception of political instability and lack of C2 security, currently the greatest vulnerability.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Positive: German commitment of €170M for energy repair.
• Geopolitical Alignment: Polish purchase of three submarines from Sweden (17:23Z) signals increased NATO strategic anxiety and long-term procurement adjustments in response to perceived Russian threat escalation.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF achieves sustained operational momentum, pushing 15–25 km past the Pokrovsk pocket remnants toward the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border by 270600Z. RF forces will prioritize the securing of the Zatishye–Novopavlivka corridor to ensure a wide avenue of approach. RF IO will continue to flood the information space with politically damaging leaks and geopolitical rumors to maximize internal UAF and international friction.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF mechanized forces, having achieved breakthrough conditions, bypass UAF delaying forces and target a critical logistics hub or major C2 center near Kryvyi Rih/Dnipropetrovsk city border by 271200Z. This kinetic action is preceded or accompanied by a high-impact deception operation leveraging the confirmed COTS communication vulnerability (WhatsApp/Witkoff leak) to paralyze UAF strategic responses or misdirect reserves.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT AND INTERDICTION (J3/REGIONAL C2)

1. INTERDICTION FIRE PRIORITY: Prioritize deep strike assets (HIMARS, ATACMS) NLT 261900Z to target known/suspected RF concentration areas between Zatishye and Novopavlivka. Focus on disrupting logistics chains and preventing the massing of combined arms units required for a deep thrust.
2. DELAY FORCE DEPLOYMENT: J3 must confirm the physical presence and combat readiness of delay/screening forces (TF DELTA-SCREEN equivalent) on established defensive lines along the Dnipropetrovsk border NLT 262000Z. Utilize specialized SBS (Drone) units to establish forward observation and attrition zones ahead of these lines.

R-2: CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW (NCA/J2 SIGINT/J6)

1. C2 PLATFORM BLACKOUT: Immediately implement a "Blackout Protocol" for all strategic-level communications (NCA, Diplomatic, and J-staff) utilizing Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) messaging platforms. This must include an emergency review of personal devices for strategic personnel. Assume COTS channels are compromised until proven otherwise. (IMMEDIATE ACTION)
2. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TASKING: J2 SIGINT must accelerate the technical assessment of the suspected interception mechanism (WhatsApp/device exploit) to determine the full scope of RF penetration NLT 270600Z.

R-3: COGNITIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTER-IO (NCA/J2 IO)

1. GEOPOLITICAL COUNTER-NARRATIVE: NCA must issue a strategic communication emphasizing the continuity and bipartisan nature of US support, directly referencing the German aid and Polish strategic procurements as evidence of strong Western resolve. Simultaneously, delegitimize the "Trump Envoy" speculation as RF psychological warfare designed to coincide with battlefield pressure.
2. FOCUS ON RESILIENCE: Utilize the confirmed success against RF ISR (Granat-4 shootdown) and the high morale/recruitment efforts of the SBS (Unmanned Systems Forces) to counter the RF narrative of collapse and highlight UAF tactical adaptation and internal strength.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS