Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261700Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: RF EXPLOITATION PIVOT CONFIRMED ON ZAPORIZHZHIA AXIS. CRITICAL C2 COMMUNICATIONS VULNERABILITY IDENTIFIED (USHAKOV/WITKOFF LEAK).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains CRITICAL (DEFCON 2). The primary operational objective for RF forces has successfully transitioned from the Pokrovsk encirclement to exploiting the resulting vacuum on the southern flank.

• Pokrovsk Axis (HOLDING/ATTRITION): RF forces are consolidating positions and utilizing deep fires to maximize attrition against UAF elements executing Fragmented Defense Protocols (FDPs). The T-05-15 GLOC remains compromised.
• Zaporizhzhia Axis (MAIN EFFORT): Confirmed Russian military correspondent reports (Alex Parker) corroborate previous intelligence regarding sustained offensive pressure around Stepnohirsk and Huliaipole outskirts. This validates the assessment that the RF main effort is now aimed at breaching the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Northern Fixation Axis (Sustained Pressure): Minor kinetic and reconnaissance activities continue in the North. UAF Air Force confirms RF UAV tracking near Huty, Kharkiv Region. Russian claims of minor advances in the Vovchansk sector (Rybar/Warrior of North) serve to fix UAF reserves in the North.
• Key Terrain: The defense of the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative Border remains the most critical requirement to prevent operational depth penetration.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No significant change since 261604Z. Conditions remain conducive for heavy kinetic fire and mechanized movement. Drone surveillance over the Serebryansky Forest (16:04Z) confirms continued high-intensity, attrition-based warfare characterized by severe environmental degradation.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The MDCOA C2 strategic missile strike window (1500Z-1600Z) expired without successful strike confirmation, validating the readiness posture of strategic AD assets during that period. UAF forces are currently engaged in stabilizing the Zaporizhzhia flank while simultaneously executing FDP accountability checks and withdrawal procedures from the Pokrovsk pocket.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is clear: transform the tactical success at Pokrovsk into a strategic breakthrough toward the Dnieper River line via the Zaporizhzhia axis, while paralyzing UAF high command via synchronized IO.

• Logistical Sustainment (Manpower): RF recruitment efforts remain highly aggressive, exemplified by the €4.1M RUB signing bonus offered in the Yugra region (16:26Z). This indicates RF is prepared to continue high-casualty attrition warfare for the foreseeable future, viewing manpower costs as a financial, not strategic, constraint. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactical Focus Confirmation: RF military bloggers and media outlets are reporting successes linking the Pokrovsk victory with aggressive thrusts in the Stepnohirsk/Huliaipole areas, aligning RF information space efforts with actual kinetic operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Adaptation (IO/C2 Interception): The suggestion by Ushakov (16:06Z) that the sensitive Witkoff communication may have been intercepted via WhatsApp introduces a critical intelligence finding: RF has a high-confidence capability to intercept, process, and immediately weaponize private communications involving key Ukrainian/US political actors. This points to a significant SIGINT or Cyber Espionage capability employed against strategic UAF/NCA communications. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE on interception mechanism; HIGH CONFIDENCE on the resultant C2 vulnerability.)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The RF continues its strategy of fixing UAF forces in the North (Vovchansk, UAV track toward Huty) while committing maneuver forces to the decisive point on the Zaporizhzhia flank.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are sufficient to sustain high-intensity operations in the South, supported by significant, aggressively incentivized manpower recruitment drives across the Russian Federation.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, demonstrated by the rapid pivot to exploitation and the synchronization of operational actions with high-impact psychological operations (IO).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture remains CRITICAL/STRAINED. Execution of FDPs from Pokrovsk is ongoing under heavy fire. The immediate focus is preserving combat power and delaying the RF breakthrough on the southern flank.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESSES:
  • Successful execution of AD procedures leading to the expiry of the strategic C2 strike MDCOA window (1600Z).
  • Successful SBU counterintelligence operation in Sumy (16:13Z), neutralizing an FSB espionage attempt, demonstrating resilience in the internal security domain.
• SETBACKS: The critical strategic setback remains the Pokrovsk encirclement. Compounded by the inferred C2 communications breach (Ushakov/WhatsApp), which demands immediate rectification.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Rapid deployment of forces (TF DELTA-SCREEN equivalent) to the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border. CONSTRAINT: The confirmation of a potential hostile SIGINT/Cyber capability against sensitive NCA communications imposes a severe operational constraint on secure coordination with international partners and internal strategic planning.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is operating at peak intensity, leveraging kinetic success and political subversion simultaneously.

• C2/NCA Subversion (PRIORITY): The "Mindichgate" narrative targeting Head of the Office of the President Yermak continues (16:17Z). This is amplified by the political damage of the Witkoff meeting confirmation, which is now tied to a potentially exploited communications channel (WhatsApp) that RF is using to demonstrate its access and impunity.
• Morale Degradation: RF is aggressively utilizing interviews with captured UAF servicemen (38th Marine Brigade, 16:06Z) and mocking UAF command (Colonelcassad quote on Pokrovsk, 16:29Z) to maximize the psychological impact of the Pokrovsk loss and inhibit effective defense preparation.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic morale is highly susceptible to the synchronized defeatist narratives being pushed by RF. The successful SBU operation and the confirmation of Ukrainian resilience (Serebryansky Forest resistance imagery) must be utilized immediately as counter-IO talking points.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The primary diplomatic concern is the political fallout and perception of US/Kyiv instability resulting from the Witkoff leak. The Moldovan drone incident (16:32Z) is a secondary distraction, confirming continued disregard for neighbor sovereignty but lacking immediate operational impact.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF achieves limited to moderate operational depth (10-20km) on the Zaporizhzhia Axis by 270000Z, concentrating firepower near Zatishye/Stepnohirsk. This pressure is intended to draw strategic UAF reserves into a delaying action away from prepared lines. RF IO maintains extreme pressure on Kyiv and Washington by continually highlighting the C2/ComSec vulnerability exploited in the Witkoff case to compel strategic concession discussions.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF mechanized forces (reinforced by heavy FAB support) achieve a breakthrough toward major logistics hubs or C2 nodes behind the Dnipropetrovsk border by 270600Z. Concurrently, RF leverages the confirmed communications breach to execute a targeted deception operation, feeding false or contradictory orders into key UAF communication channels, leading to tactical paralysis on the southern front.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT AND SOUTHERN RESPONSE (J3/Regional C2)

1. EXPEDITED DEPLOYMENT: J3 must execute the deployment of TF DELTA-SCREEN or equivalent delay force (as recommended in previous SITREP) to established defensive positions along the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border NLT 262000Z. Utilize all available long-range fire assets (ATACMS/HIMARS) to interdict RF logistics and concentration areas near Zatishye/Huliaipole.
2. Drone Massing: Prioritize the massing of available FPV/Drone units to the Stepnohirsk/Zatishye approach to provide low-cost attrition and immediate delay capability, compensating for the lack of mechanized reserves.

R-2: CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW (NCA/J2 SIGINT/J6)

1. C2 VULNERABILITY MITIGATION (IMMEDIATE): Based on the Ushakov message, J2 SIGINT and J6 must immediately investigate potential RF interception/exploitation of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) used by senior NCA personnel for sensitive communications.
2. PROTOCOL LOCKDOWN: All strategic communications involving diplomatic or operational planning details must immediately transition to verified, military-grade encrypted communication systems, effective NLT 261800Z. Assume all COTS platforms are compromised for strategic use.

R-3: COGNITIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTER-IO (NCA/J2 IO)

1. HARDLINE COUNTER-NARRATIVE (URGENT): The NCA counter-IO response (previously R-3) must be refined to specifically address the mechanism of the Witkoff leak, framing it as an RF cyber/espionage attack designed to sow doubt and distract from RF atrocities. The messaging should emphasize that RF must resort to espionage because diplomacy is not serving their war aims.
2. INTERNAL RESILIENCE HIGHLIGHT: Immediately disseminate information regarding the SBU counterintelligence success in Sumy (neutralizing FSB spy) to domestic audiences, contrasting it sharply with the RF MoD propaganda using captured UAF service members (38th Marine Brigade). This demonstrates internal stability and counter-subversion capability.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS