Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261304Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL MOMENT: RFB STATUS UNCONFIRMED (DEADLINE PASSED). FRAGMENTED DEFENSE CONTINGENCY REQUIRED. RF EXPANDING KINETIC SHAPING OPERATIONS (KRASNOLYMANSKE). PAVLOHRAD UAS THREAT REMAINS.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is marked by highly synchronized kinetic shaping operations preceding the anticipated main assault on the Pokrovsk axis.

• Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka Axis (CRITICAL): RF offensive pressure is sustained. Pro-RF sources confirm a successful high-value strike against a UAF vehicle (Humvee) by DPR Special Forces near Kostiantynivka (12:59Z). This confirms RF intent to degrade mobile UAF reserves near the critical defensive lines.
• Krasnolymanske Direction (ESCALATION): Pro-RF sources claim significant advance by the RF 144th Motor Rifle Division, approaching Koroviy Yar and reaching the line Stavky – Yarovaya (12:56Z).
  • Assessment (JUDGMENT): While likely exaggerated, this claim indicates expanded RF effort to fix or divert UAF reserves away from the Pokrovsk sector. If verified, this flank movement threatens Siverskyi Donets defenses.
• Zaporizhzhia: Confirmed low-level VDV engagement near Primorskoye (12:43Z), reinforcing the persistence of the Vostok Grouping's fixation mission.
• Deep Strike BDA: RF IO confirms widespread damage to Naftogaz energy infrastructure (12:57Z), confirming the effectiveness of the preceding massed strike and continued RF information exploitation.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

Current conditions (favorable for maneuver) continue to support high-tempo mechanized and UAS operations across all fronts.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The operational vulnerability identified in the previous SITREP (261234Z NOV 25) is now fully manifested.

• Reserve Force Bravo (RFB) Status: The critical confirmation deadline (NLT 261245Z) for the physical movement of RFB has PASSED WITHOUT CONFIRMATION (CRITICAL GAP).
• Control Measure Shift: The primary control measure must now shift from waiting for RFB to IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OF THE FRAGMENTED DEFENSE CONTINGENCY PLAN (CONPLAN DELTA), utilizing local and regional tactical reserves.
• Immediate Air Threat (Pavlohrad): The confirmed enemy UAS group approaching the critical logistics node of Pavlohrad (12:17Z) remains unaddressed and represents an immediate precursor to the MDCOA.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is to achieve kinetic breakthrough on the Pokrovsk axis while simultaneously leveraging multi-domain pressure.

• Kinetic Intent: RF is expanding the geographic scope of its kinetic shaping operations (Krasnolymanske) to maximize the diffusion of UAF reserves ahead of the main Pokrovsk assault.
• IO Intent: Use synchronized IO to manage the strategic embarrassment of the Taganrog/Cheboksary strikes by pushing premature peace proposals (Minsk) and exploiting confirmed kinetic BDA (Naftogaz).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF adaptation is focused on achieving operational tempo in sectors where UAF reserves are weakest:

1. Distributed Pressure: The introduction of claims regarding advances in the Krasnolymanske sector suggests RF is testing secondary defensive lines to find a point of least resistance or to force UAF General Staff (GS) to commit resources away from the primary Pokrovsk objective.
2. High-Value Targeting: The confirmed SpN strike near Kostiantynivka confirms RF prioritization of destroying UAF mobility and tactical C2 near the front line.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment remains focused on forward deployment necessary for the imminent assault. RF IO is exploiting BDA of UAF energy infrastructure (Naftogaz) to amplify the perceived impact of their deep strikes, compensating for the strategic blow dealt by UAF strikes on Cheboksary/Taganrog.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

C2 remains effectively synchronized across kinetic and informational domains. The immediate priority for RF tactical C2 appears to be establishing resilient field communications (NRTK "Kurier") to ensure control during the anticipated mechanized maneuver.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture is CRITICAL/DEFCON 2. Failure to confirm RFB movement requires an immediate shift to contingency defense. Tactical readiness remains high (confirmed operational status of Mirage-2000 aircraft/crews; effective counter-IO operations).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Tactical Setback (IMPLIED): The successful RF strike near Kostiantynivka (Humvee) indicates successful counter-infiltration or targeting of UAF frontline tactical movements.
• Counter-Hybrid Success: Effective IO efforts include the release of a captured RF soldier confession detailing morale issues and internal unit abuse (12:54Z), directly countering the RF narrative of low UAF morale (Pokrovsk POW, 12:55Z).
• Internal Resilience: UAF authorities (Prosecutor General's Office, Ministry of Veteran Affairs) are effectively demonstrating functionality and governance through legal victories and service development (12:46Z, 12:59Z).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The failure of RFB to confirm deployment status. This mandates the immediate release of pre-designated regional reserves (e.g., Territorial Defense or third-echelon brigades) to stabilize the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka corridor NLT 261400Z.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO continues its synchronized three-pronged attack:

1. Internal Undermining: Distributing video of an alleged UAF POW from Pokrovsk claiming high casualties and low morale (12:55Z).
2. External Diversion: Amplifying damage to critical infrastructure (Naftogaz BDA) to distract from UAF deep strike successes.
3. Political Polarization: Russian sources are pushing narratives that the U.S. "war party" is attacking peace initiatives (12:55Z), intended to fracture Western unity.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF pilot morale appears high regarding the integration of advanced Western platforms (Mirage-2000). The focus on veteran care (12:46Z) and environmental protection (12:59Z) provides key domestic stability indicators, countering RF narratives of collapsing UAF governance.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The US-Belarus discussions regarding political prisoners (12:40Z) create diplomatic leverage, potentially destabilizing the Moscow-Minsk axis ahead of a major RF kinetic commitment. RF IO attempts to delegitimize Western economic support through propaganda concerning Finland (12:57Z).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will launch the main mechanized assault along the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka axis NLT 261800Z. This assault will be preceded or accompanied by verified kinetic escalation on the Krasnolymanske/Siverskyi Donets axis aimed at fixing UAF forces in the north, maximizing the efficacy of the main effort.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) In direct coordination with the ground assault, RF will execute a coordinated high-precision missile strike against critical logistics and C2 targets, focusing on Pavlohrad (logistics hub) and Poltava/Vinnytsia (backup C2 nodes), NLT 261500Z. The UAS detected over Pavlohrad (12:17Z) is assessed to be finalizing targeting data for this MDCOA.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL RESPONSE (J3)

1. CONTINGENCY EXECUTION (IMMEDIATE ACTION): Due to the failure to confirm Reserve Force Bravo movement by the 1245Z deadline, J3 must immediately declare RFB non-viable for the current operation and authorize the FULL EXECUTION of CONPLAN DELTA (Fragmented Defense) utilizing pre-designated regional tactical reserves to reinforce the Pokrovsk sector NLT 261400Z.
2. KRASNOLYMANSKE VERIFICATION: Task aerial and SIGINT ISR assets immediately to verify the scope and veracity of the 144th Motor Rifle Division's claimed advance on Koroviy Yar. If confirmed, divert adequate firepower (Artillery/MLRS) to interdict RF advance NLT 261500Z.
3. KOSITANTYNIVKA COUNTER-INFILTRATION: Increase the employment of FPV drones and counter-sniper teams in the Kostiantynivka sector to neutralize DPR SpN elements confirmed active in the area (12:59Z).

R-2: AIR DEFENSE AND STRATEGIC HARDENING (AD Command/J2)

1. PAVLOHRAD DEFENSE PRIORITY: Divert all available mobile SHORAD/MRAD assets to Pavlohrad immediately to counter the confirmed UAS threat (12:17Z) and establish hardened defense against the MDCOA NLT 261330Z.
2. C2 AD POSTURE: Maintain maximum alert level (DEFCON 2) for MRAD assets protecting Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 backup nodes through 261600Z to mitigate the high risk of a retaliatory decapitation strike.

R-3: INFORMATION WARFARE & COGNITIVE DEFENSE (NCA/J2 IO)

1. POW COUNTER-NARRATIVE: Amplify the captured RF serviceman's confession (12:54Z) across all channels, contrasting the high morale of UAF forces (Mirage-2000 pilots) with the systemic abuse within RF units.
2. EXPOSE RF DIVERSION: Immediately issue statements linking the fabricated Pokrovsk POW video and the Minsk negotiation push directly to the incoming mechanized assault, framing the RF IO as a desperate act to mask kinetic failure.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS