Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261234Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL MOMENT: RESERVE MOVEMENT (RFB) AT T-ZERO. RF INFILTRATION PROBES FAILED. UAF STRATEGIC STRIKE CONFIRMED (TAGANROG). ENEMY C2 VULNERABILITY EXPOSED.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains focused on the containment of RF breakthrough attempts along the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka corridor and the Vostok Grouping's pressure in Zaporizhzhia Oblast.

• Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka Axis (CRITICAL): UAF Special Operations Forces (SSO) confirmed successful raid operations on the northern outskirts of Pokrovsk (12:14Z), indicating active forward defense and infiltration capabilities. A direct RF reconnaissance probe toward Kostiantynivka (motorcycle equipped with heavy EW) was interdicted and destroyed (12:24Z). This confirms RF attempts to penetrate deep behind the main line of defense (MLD).
• Southern Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia: RF Vostok Grouping continues offensive operations (12:05Z). The deployment of the RF NRTK "Kurier" mobile communications/relay system is confirmed in Southern Donbas (12:20Z), suggesting an immediate intent to secure field Command and Control (C2) during major maneuver operations.
• Deep Strike Operations (STRATEGIC SUCCESS): Confirmation that the drone attack on Taganrog (Rostov region) on 25 NOV resulted in sufficient casualties and infrastructure damage to prompt the declaration of a day of mourning (27 NOV, 12:05Z). This confirms sustained UAF deep strike capacity following the confirmed Cheboksary MIC hit.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No change. Conditions continue to support high-tempo ground maneuver and UAS/strike sorties across the entire front line.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The status of Reserve Force Bravo (RFB) remains the critical control measure. The activation was designated T-zero (261200Z). Lack of immediate confirmation of physical movement presents an acute operational vulnerability, despite tactical successes achieved by SSO and frontline units.

• Immediate Air Threat: An enemy UAS group is confirmed approaching Pavlohrad from the East (12:17Z). Pavlohrad is a critical logistics node; this UAS threat requires immediate Air Defense (AD) response.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intentions are fully synchronized: Achieve kinetic breakthroughs while leveraging the diplomatic offensive to paralyze UAF and international decision-making.

• Diplomatic Weaponization: The repeated pushing of the Lukashenko/Minsk negotiation proposal (12:09Z, 12:11Z) aims to create political friction immediately following UAF strategic success (Cheboksary/Taganrog strikes).
• C2 Resiliency vs. Vulnerability:
  • Resilience: RF deployment of the NRTK "Kurier" mobile communications system (12:20Z) indicates a proactive measure to harden field C2 against UAF EW/SIGINT during the anticipated offensive push. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Vulnerability (CRITICAL): Intelligence confirms high-level RF diplomatic communications (Yuri Ushakov/US counterpart) were conducted via unsecured commercial channels (WhatsApp) and subsequently intercepted/leaked (12:31Z). Assessment: This represents a massive, systemic failure in RF high-level SIGINT/Comms Security. While tactical C2 is being hardened (Kurier), strategic C2 remains severely vulnerable. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF is relying on highly specialized, dispersed infiltration units (motorcycles with EW) to probe weak points in the Kostiantynivka defense. This indicates an attempt to find paths for main mechanized forces to follow if the frontal assault fails.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF operational sustainment remains adequate for the current push. The long-term impact of the Cheboksary and Taganrog strikes (MIC/logistic hubs) is significant but will take weeks to manifest at the front line. RF domestic IO is attempting to manage internal discontent (corruption arrests, food safety assurance).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

Assessment: STRESSED, HIGH SYNCHRONIZATION. RF C2 remains effective at coordinating the kinetic, informational, and diplomatic domains simultaneously. However, the catastrophic SIGINT vulnerability exposed at the strategic level (WhatsApp leak) suggests critical operational security failures that UAF intelligence must immediately exploit.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Posture remains CRITICAL due to the unconfirmed status of RFB movement, but tactical engagement capacity is HIGH (confirmed successful SSO raids near Pokrovsk, successful interdiction of EW-equipped recce unit).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Strategic Success: Confirmed UAF strategic strike capacity demonstrated by attacks on the Cheboksary MIC facility and the Taganrog military/logistics hub.
• Tactical Successes: Successful engagement of Russian reconnaissance and personnel on the Pokrovsk and Siverskyi directions (12:11Z, 12:24Z).
• Internal Setbacks (IO Vulnerability): RF IO is exploiting confirmed internal friction (Rada budget difficulties, 12:30Z) and localized corruption cases (Donetsk heating graft, 12:31Z) to undermine the UAF narrative of unity and efficient governance.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL Constraint: The non-confirmation of RFB deployment. New Requirement: Immediate allocation of SHORAD/MRAD to Pavlohrad to protect key logistics nodes from the confirmed UAS threat (12:17Z).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF is running a two-track IO:

1. External: Push the Minsk negotiation proposal (peace frame) to mitigate the strategic success of UAF deep strikes.
2. Internal/Targeted: Amplify UAF internal dysfunction (Rada budget, corruption) to erode domestic morale and international confidence in Kyiv's stability.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is boosted by confirmed strategic strikes. However, the risk of cognitive paralysis at the NCA level remains high due to the synchronized IO/diplomatic pressure. Ukraine's public clarification of "red lines" for peace talks (12:13Z) is an effective preemptive measure against the RF peace proposal.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

International support remains strong (EU frozen asset loan confirmation from previous report). Counter-intelligence success in France (arrests of RF spies, 12:28Z) reinforces Western counter-hybrid operations. US discussion with Belarus regarding political prisoners (12:29Z) introduces a complex diplomatic vector aimed at loosening the Minsk-Moscow alignment.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will launch the mechanized assault along the Pokrovsk axis NLT 261800Z, simultaneously leveraging the deployment of the NRTK Kurier system to maintain resilient field C2. The synchronized Minsk diplomatic proposal will be amplified NLT 261500Z to force an NCA reaction, masking the kinetic commitment.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) In direct retaliation for the highly effective Cheboksary and Taganrog strikes, RF will execute a coordinated high-precision missile strike against multiple logistics and C2 targets, focusing on Pavlohrad (logistics hub) and Poltava/Vinnytsia (backup C2 nodes), NLT 261500Z. The UAS detected over Pavlohrad (12:17Z) is highly likely a reconnaissance or diversionary element preceding the MDCOA.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT AND CONTAINMENT OPERATIONS (J3)

1. RESERVE FORCE BRAVO STATUS (IMMEDIATE ACTION): J3 must confirm physical, documented movement of RFB NLT 261245Z. If confirmation fails, immediately authorize execution of the fragmented defense contingency plan using regional tactical reserves.
2. KOSITANTYNIVKA DEFENSE: Alert frontline units in the Kostiantynivka sector to increased RF reliance on specialized EW/recce units (following the motorcycle strike). Increase FPV/ISR coverage along potential infiltration routes.

R-2: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND COGNITIVE DEFENSE (NCA/J2 IO)

1. DIPLOMATIC REFUTATION: NCA must issue a robust statement NLT 261400Z rejecting the Minsk proposal as a cynical RF maneuver designed to gain time following UAF strategic strikes. The statement must reference Ukraine’s pre-defined "red lines" (12:13Z).
2. EXPLOIT RF C2 FAILURE: J2 IO must immediately incorporate the RF WhatsApp SIGINT failure into its narrative, framing Russia's diplomatic efforts as incompetent and insecure, thereby undermining the credibility of the Minsk proposal.

R-3: AIR DEFENSE AND MDCOA MITIGATION (AD Command/J2)

1. PAVLOHRAD LOGISTICS DEFENSE (IMMEDIATE): Divert the closest mobile SHORAD/MRAD assets to intercept the confirmed UAS group targeting Pavlohrad NLT 261315Z.
2. STRATEGIC C2 HARDENING: Maintain maximum AD readiness over Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 backup nodes NLT 261400Z to mitigate the high risk of retaliatory strike (MDCOA).

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS