Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261100Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: PENETRATION CONTAINMENT PRIORITY. RF IO PIVOTS TO "OBSTRUCTIONIST" NARRATIVE. MDCOA RISK REMAINS EXTREME.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains dominated by the RF penetration into the Pokrovsk urban center (confirmed 261030Z at the Railway Station).

• Pokrovsk Status: UAF elements are engaged in immediate counter-penetration operations. The operational priority is shifting to preventing RF consolidation beyond the immediate railway area and securing secondary evacuation routes (west toward Kostiantynivka).
• Southern Fixation (Confirmed): RF continues kinetic pressure on the Zaporizhzhia sector. New reports confirm RF maneuvering to bypass Stepnohirsk from the west (via garden plots/suburbs), indicating an intent to threaten the town's rear and tie down UAF SOF/holding forces. Air Force reports confirm continued KAB launches on the sector.
• Northern Penetration Vector (New): Multiple groups of RF UAVs (assessed Shahed 136/131) are tracked inbound toward Krolevets, Sumy Oblast. This indicates a new deep strike effort targeting Northern logistics or AD sites, likely to prevent reinforcement movement south.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No change. Weather remains permissive for high-tempo operations and continued RF use of fixed-wing/UAS assets.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are under extreme stress on the Pokrovsk Axis. The delay in activating Reserve Force Bravo (pending NCA decision) is the critical control failure point.

• RF Confirmation of BDA: RF sources (Colonelcassad) are amplifying footage of the damaged gas infrastructure, explicitly stating Kyiv is "understating the damage" to deter follow-up strikes. This confirms RF intent to leverage infrastructure destruction for strategic effect.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent is now clearly two-fold: Kinetic Control (Pokrovsk) + Cognitive Rationalization (Peace Talks).

• Intent Refinement (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The primary RF intention is to solidify the Pokrovsk breakthrough NLT 261300Z to demonstrate operational momentum, which is then used to validate the specific IO narrative currently being deployed.
• Capability: Deep Strike Planning (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF propaganda targeting Ukrainian C2 ("The top needs to be taken down...") directly correlates with the prior MDCOA assessment (Poltava/Vinnytsia strike). The detection of new UAV groups toward Krolevets confirms sustained deep strike capacity and active reconnaissance.
• Front Fixation: Active combat confirmed on the Krasnolimansky Front (RF operational updates) and continued pressure around Stepnohirsk/Novopavlovka confirms RF’s ability to conduct simultaneous, fixing operations across multiple axes.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF is exhibiting high tactical synchronization by immediately leveraging the Pokrovsk penetration with a shift in the information operation. There are no major changes to maneuver doctrine, only escalation in intensity and focus on C2/infrastructure targeting.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics appear adequate to support the current high-tempo offensive, evidenced by sustained KAB usage in Zaporizhzhia and simultaneous UAS strikes in the Sumy region. RF domestic messaging (TASS reporting on budget approval) suggests internal stability regarding military financing for 2026-2028.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in synchronizing strategic communication (Peskov) with kinetic timing (Pokrovsk breakthrough). This operational-level synchronization is currently superior to UAF C2 adaptation speed.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: CRITICAL, AWAITING AUTHORIZATION. Frontline units on the Pokrovsk axis are committed to urban close-quarters battle (CQB) to prevent RF consolidation. The lack of authorized reserve movement NLT 261100Z leaves the current containment efforts vulnerable to RF exploitation.

• Southern Response: UAF South Defense Forces are managing the informational threat, explicitly calling out the RF "zrada" (betrayal/panic) campaign concerning Huliaipole, indicating high awareness but continued vulnerability to psychological warfare.
• Tactical Successes: Confirmed UAF drone strike effectiveness in Kharkiv Oblast (Kruhliakivka), demonstrating localized technical superiority despite strategic pressure.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (CRITICAL): Continued paralysis at NCA level concerning reserve deployment (R-2 from previous report not confirmed executed).
• Setback (STRATEGIC/IO): Failure to issue a definitive NCA counter-statement has allowed the RF IO narrative to pivot and gain traction (R-1 failure).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate resource constraint is maneuver time and reserve deployment. Every hour of delay in activating Reserve Force Bravo increases the force requirement needed to dislodge RF elements from the Pokrovsk center.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (CRITICAL THREAT)

RF IO has executed a successful pivot, moving into Phase 2: The Obstructionist Narrative.

• New Narrative (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Peskov (TASS, 10:07Z, 10:26Z) is denying imminent peace while simultaneously utilizing proxy channels (НгП раZVедка, 10:19Z) to plant specific, false claims: Ukraine accepts the US plan but rejects three key points (Army size, NATO, Territory).
  • Goal: This frames Kyiv as the unreasonable party and the key obstacle to peace, rationalizing continued escalation (Pokrovsk penetration, infrastructure strikes) as necessary punitive action to achieve compliance.
• Weaponizing Ambiguity: Peskov maintains ambiguity on the Witkoff visit date, ensuring diplomatic uncertainty continues to suppress Western political support for Kyiv.
• Fixation IO: Active "zrada" campaigns are confirmed targeting UAF morale in the Southern sector.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is likely deteriorating due to the compounding effect of the infrastructure attack, the confirmed loss of key urban ground in Pokrovsk, and the persistent, refined RF IO narrative blaming Kyiv for the lack of peace.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Negative Signal: Confirmed reports of Hungarian PM Viktor Orban visiting Moscow this Friday amplify the risk of internal EU fracture and delay of aid packages. This confirms a negative macro-signal predicted previously.
• Internal RF Focus: RF domestic news emphasizes non-military stability (TASS on budget, cultural events), projecting an image of normality and long-term endurance.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces will dedicate resources to repel immediate UAF counter-penetration efforts and solidify control over the Pokrovsk Railway Station and the T-05-15 GLOC corridor NLT 261300Z. Concurrently, RF deep strike assets (UAS/Cruise Missiles) will execute targeting runs on confirmed UAF AD/Logistics nodes in the Sumy region (Krolevets) to dilute the UAF AD coverage over key C2 nodes in Central Ukraine. The IO campaign will continue its obstructionist narrative to prevent UAF reserve release.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF intelligence and kinetic units, having successfully pressured Kyiv and confirmed infrastructure vulnerability (gas), execute a coordinated high-precision ballistic or cruise missile strike targeting the Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 backup nodes NLT 261500Z. This strike would aim for command decapitation precisely as UAF attempts to rally reserves for the Pokrovsk containment, ensuring catastrophic operational C2 failure.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND COGNITIVE DEFENSE (NCA/J2 IO)

1. REFINE COUNTER-IO (261130Z): The NCA must issue a targeted response that explicitly addresses the RF's new "obstructionist" narrative. The statement must:
   • a) Label the specific claim (800k troop limit, NATO rejection) as a fabricated RF requirement intended to sow panic.
   • b) Frame the simultaneous Pokrovsk attack and the energy strikes as the true RF peace proposal—violence and coercion—which Ukraine will decisively reject.
2. TARGETED MORALE BOOST: Utilize UAF success footage (e.g., Kharkiv drone strikes, southern defense resilience) to counter the domestic "zrada" narrative, focusing output on channels known to be targeted by RF IO (South, Central Ukraine).

R-2: FORCE MANAGEMENT AND CONTAINMENT OPERATIONS (J3)

1. IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT OF RESERVE BRAVO: If not yet executed, authorize and expedite the movement of Reserve Force Bravo NLT 261200Z. Prioritize air defense and electronic warfare (EW) support for the movement column to mitigate RF drone and glide bomb threats.
2. POKROVSK FIRE SUPPORT: Immediately task available artillery and MRLS assets to suppress RF logistical and staging areas west and south of the established Pokrovsk penetration point, specifically targeting anticipated reinforcement paths from the T-05-15 road toward the center.

R-3: CRITICAL ASSET HARDENING AND MDCOA MITIGATION (AD Command)

1. C2 AD DEPLOYMENT (TIME CRITICAL): Reinforce the requirement for PAC-3/SAMP-T or equivalent AD assets to achieve operational status over the Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 nodes NLT 261400Z. This is the highest priority kinetic defense task.
2. KROLEVETS UAV MITIGATION: Immediately dispatch mobile Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) teams (e.g., Gepard, MANPADS teams) to the projected flight path of the Krolevets UAV groups to protect identified logistics hubs and prevent further AD dilution.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS