Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261030Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: RF FORCES PENETRATE CENTRAL POKROVSK (RAILWAY STATION). GAS INFRASTRUCTURE DEGRADATION CONFIRMED. RF IO CAMPAIGN ACHIEVES OPERATIONAL PARALYSIS.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The RF ground assault on the Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast) has achieved a critical tactical breakthrough.

• Pokrovsk Center Penetration (CRITICAL FACT, HIGH CONFIDENCE): Verified open-source reports (DeepState, Tsapliyenko) confirm RF element presence near the Pokrovsk Railway Station (Zaliznychnyy Vokzal). This represents penetration into the central district, bypassing or overrunning immediate UAF defensive lines.
• T-05-15 GLOC Status: The primary Ground Line of Communication (GLOC) remains functionally severed or under direct fire control of RF forces operating from the newly established positions. Immediate UAF priority shifts from preventing penetration to establishing containment and protecting secondary lines of retreat/resupply (e.g., roads to Myrnohrad and Kostiantynivka).
• Southern Fixation: RF aviation continues airstrikes in Zaporizhzhia (Huliaipole, Orikhiv), effectively pinning UAF elements and preventing reinforcement movement to the Donetsk axis (GSZSU data).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No significant change. Conditions remain conducive to high-tempo kinetic operations and RF use of deep fires and UAS assets.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The targeted destruction of critical infrastructure is confirmed and ongoing.

• Confirmed Gas Infrastructure Strike (CRITICAL FACT, HIGH CONFIDENCE): Visual evidence (AP/Tsapliyenko) confirms catastrophic damage (scorched storage tanks, severe structural compromise) to a critical Naftogaz gas infrastructure site in Central Ukraine. This validates the strategic assessment that RF aims to systematically degrade Ukrainian operational endurance, particularly targeting winter resilience.
• UAF Posture: Forces on the Pokrovsk Axis are engaged in high-intensity urban defense/counter-penetration maneuvers. The rapid penetration to the railway station indicates a critical failure in tactical reserve positioning or maneuver speed.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent remains unchanged: Achieve localized operational success at Pokrovsk and utilize the resulting psychological shock and physical degradation to force strategic negotiations.

• Capability: Operational Synchronization (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is successfully synchronizing the timing of the kinetic breakthrough (Pokrovsk penetration) with the peak amplification of the cognitive assault (US Peace Plan narrative).
• Ground Force Commitment (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The aggressive penetration into the urban center using high-readiness infantry (previously assessed as VDV/Airborne elements) confirms RF willingness to absorb higher tactical losses to achieve the objective of GLOC severance and urban control NLT the assessed timeline.
• Logistics/Sustainment: The "Rubicon" propaganda video, explicitly featuring MoD emblems and drone warfare, indicates sustained RF capacity for combined arms operations supported by modern technical capabilities (drones, EW).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed presence of RF units at the railway station indicates a shift from peripheral pressure to direct urban penetration. This suggests RF successfully breached or bypassed the immediate, layered defense of Rodynske/Pokrovsk microdistricts much faster than anticipated.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF messaging continues to manage the home front narrative, promoting veteran welfare (Lipetsk program) and operational competence ("Rubicon" unit success), suggesting internal confidence in sustained operations.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains adaptive and highly effective in the information domain. Ushakov's public comments (TASS) maintain the critical diplomatic ambiguity: acknowledge high-level US talks while denying formal commitments, forcing Kyiv to react defensively.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: CRITICAL / IMMEDIATE CONTAINMENT REQUIRED. The penetration into Pokrovsk center demands immediate activation of mobile reserves for counter-penetration operations. Continued paralysis at the National Command Authority (NCA) due to the IO campaign has critically delayed necessary force adjustments.

• Technical Readiness: UAF units are seeking technical solutions (EW specialist interview) and anticipating new Western platforms (Mirage 2000), but these efforts do not address the immediate, critical shortage of maneuver reserves on the Pokrovsk axis.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (CRITICAL): Confirmed enemy presence in the Pokrovsk urban center.
• Setback (STRATEGIC): Extensive, confirmed damage to gas infrastructure severely impacts national resilience ahead of winter.
• Success (DIPLOMATIC): Arrival of Latvian FM Baiba Braže signals continued Baltic political support for Kyiv.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PRIORITY REQUIREMENT: The requirement for Reserve Force Bravo is now magnified. Its deployment must be focused on:

1. Immediate containment line establishment south and east of the Pokrovsk center penetration.
2. Protection of evacuation/resupply routes west toward Kostiantynivka/Dnipropetrovsk.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (CRITICAL THREAT)

RF IO has transitioned from setting conditions to operational exploitation.

• Exploitation of Infrastructure Damage (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Pro-Russian channels (Alex Parker Returns) are directly quoting unverified Ukrainian officials (via AP) linking the severe energy/gas infrastructure damage to an increased willingness by Kyiv to enter peace talks. This weaponizes physical damage into cognitive pressure, validating RF kinetic actions.
• Weaponizing US Diplomacy: Ushakov/Peskov's public statements regarding Witkoff's visit maintain pressure on the NCA by ensuring rumors of major concessions continue to circulate, fueling domestic anxiety and providing political cover for Western allies who may wish to press Kyiv toward a ceasefire.
• US Political Fallout: Reports of US Congress demanding Witkoff's dismissal (Tsapliyenko) confirm the IO campaign is achieving its desired effect of internal US friction over Ukraine policy.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic morale is likely plummeting due to the confirmed energy/gas infrastructure damage (Systemic risk) and the simultaneous kinetic breach at Pokrovsk, framed by the IO campaign as a consequence of diplomatic weakness.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Latvian FM arrival (positive micro-signal).
• Potential Orban visit to Moscow (negative macro-signal, potentially signaling EU fracture).
• RF diplomatic efforts (Kyrgyzstan agreement) focus on bolstering non-Western alliances.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces, having established a foothold at the Pokrovsk railway station, will utilize specialized infantry and armored support to solidify control over the main north-south axis through the town center, achieving the functional isolation of the western UAF defense perimeter and securing severance of the T-05-15 GLOC NLT 261300Z. This kinetic success will be immediately paired with high-volume IO claiming the "collapse of the Ukrainian front" and demands for immediate negotiations based on the alleged US plan.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF executes a follow-on high-precision ballistic or cruise missile strike targeting the Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 backup nodes NLT 262000Z. The vulnerability of these centers has dramatically increased due to the confirmed systemic power/gas infrastructure degradation, meaning a successful strike would likely result in catastrophic UAF operational C2 failure precisely when reserves are needed to contain the Pokrovsk breach.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND COGNITIVE DEFENSE (NCA/J2 IO)

1. URGENT, DEFINITIVE DENIAL (261100Z): The NCA must issue a pre-recorded video or live broadcast statement (President/Commander-in-Chief level) NLT 261100Z. This statement must:
   • a) Acknowledge the extreme damage to the gas and electrical grid.
   • b) Explicitly link the current RF penetration into Pokrovsk center directly to the RF diplomatic disinformation campaign (Peace Plan/AP leak). Frame the enemy action as a coordinated hybrid assault that cannot be rewarded by negotiation.
   • c) Reject any suggestion that infrastructure damage will force territorial or sovereignty concessions.

R-2: FORCE MANAGEMENT AND CONTAINMENT OPERATIONS (J3)

1. ACTIVATE & RE-TASK RESERVE FORCE BRAVO: Immediately authorize and expedite the physical movement of Reserve Force Bravo NLT 261130Z.
2. PRIORITY MISSION: Re-task Reserve Force Bravo to conduct counter-penetration and stabilization operations focused on containing the Pokrovsk Railway Station penetration and securing the secondary GLOCs leading west/northwest out of the Pokrovsk area.
3. FIRE SUPPORT: Prioritize long-range precision fires (HIMARS/ATACMS) on RF assembly areas identified by ISR supporting the Pokrovsk penetration elements to disrupt follow-on forces and prevent exploitation beyond the town center.

R-3: CRITICAL ASSET HARDENING AND MDCOA MITIGATION (AD Command/J4 Energy)

1. C2 AD RELOCATION (MDCOA Mitigation): Maintain the immediate tasking to execute the relocation of PAC-3/SAMP-T or equivalent high-tier AD assets to establish protective AD bubbles over the Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 nodes NLT 261400Z. This is a survivability prerequisite.
2. GAS INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY: Deploy military police or territorial defense units to confirmed or suspected high-value gas infrastructure repair sites to protect mobile repair crews and prevent secondary sabotage/reconnaissance (SSO/UAS threats).

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS