Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 261000Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: KINETIC EXPLOITATION IMMINENT. BALLISTIC VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED. RF IO INTENSIFIES COGNITIVE DECAPITATION EFFORT.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational situation remains critically degraded, defined by the RF main effort on the Pokrovsk Axis and coordinated fixation operations across the Southern and Northern operational areas.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk): RF pressure persists on the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC), specifically near the Rodynske sector, consistent with the predicted objective of severing supply lines to Kostiantynivka. Tactical reporting indicates specific, localized RF advances near Dymytriv/Sukhyi Yar (Krasnoarmiisk area), reinforcing the threat of breakthrough. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Fixation): Confirmed use of heavy fire support systems (TOS-1A "Solntsepek") by RF Vostok Grouping units to "clear the way" near Huliaipole. This action validates the assessment that the RF is actively committing resources to fix UAF reserves in the south. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Air Warfare: UAF Air Force confirms continued launch of KAB (Glide Bomb) strikes targeting both Donetsk and Kharkiv oblasts, serving the dual purpose of forward unit suppression and northern reserve fixation.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No significant change since 260930Z. Worsening weather in the north may restrict high-altitude ISR but is not currently constraining mechanized movement on the Pokrovsk axis.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

The threat profile is heavily skewed toward synchronized kinetic and cognitive strikes.

• UAF Deep Strike Efficacy: Russian sources confirm the interruption of oil loading operations at the Novorossiysk terminal (CPC), though operations have reportedly resumed. This demonstrates UAF capability to disrupt strategic RF logistics, offering a limited, temporary operational success in the deep rear. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Air Defense (AD) Status: The failure to intercept the two Iskander-M missiles (0/2) remains the most critical force posture vulnerability, allowing RF to dictate the terms of engagement against strategic C2 and logistics hubs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent: Achieve operational collapse on the Pokrovsk axis by physically severing logistics while simultaneously forcing NCA paralysis through high-value ballistic strikes and overwhelming information warfare.

• Capability: Ballistic Priority: The RF confirmed their ability to bypass current UAF terminal AD. This implies the enemy assesses the MDCOA (Poltava/Vinnytsia C2 strike) as highly feasible and potentially decisive.
• Capability: Electronic Warfare (EW): RF sources are actively reporting on advanced UAF EW systems (e.g., "Graphite" operated by the 69th Electronic Support Center). This indicates RF intelligence has identified specific UAF EW/C2 nodes as high-value targets, likely leading to focused SIGINT and kinetic targeting. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Intent: Cognitive Subversion: The continued and detailed dissemination of fake negotiation terms ("800k troop limit," territorial concessions, NATO rejection) is the core mechanism of cognitive decapitation, designed to fracture the NCA-Military-Civilian relationship at the moment of kinetic crisis. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactics: Subversion/Terror: RF sources are issuing public safety warnings regarding IEDs disguised as abandoned items. This serves a dual purpose: warning their own forces and subtly reinforcing the narrative of Ukrainian terrorism/partisanship in conflict zones, justifying internal security measures. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed use of TOS-1A in the Huliaipole sector confirms the Vostok Grouping's willingness to expend high-value assets for fixation, suggesting the Pokrovsk effort is receiving full support across all axes.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are supporting the high-tempo ground assault and synchronized deep strike. While UAF deep strikes (Novorossiysk) cause temporary disruption, the quick resumption of operations suggests high resilience or redundancy in the RF strategic logistics network.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains synchronized across kinetic, fixation, and cognitive domains. The successful exploitation of the "Witkoff Tapes" IO campaign continues to degrade UAF NCA responsiveness.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: CRITICAL. Forces on the Pokrovsk axis are facing peak attrition and encirclement risk. Strategic readiness is high in the AD domain against UAS but remains critically low against ballistic threats.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed temporary disruption of RF oil loading in Novorossiysk.
• Chief of General Staff Hnatov successfully countered the "troop limit" IO narrative, providing a high-level clarification to stabilize internal information space. Setbacks (CRITICAL):
• Public morale/civilian support (fundraising capacity) is lagging this morning, potentially reflecting the cumulative stress of IO, ballistic strikes, and kinetic losses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• The C2 delay in Reserve Force release remains the primary operational setback, potentially leading to irreversible tactical losses on the Pokrovsk axis.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PRIORITY REQUIREMENT: Immediate release of Reserve Force Bravo. CONSTRAINT: The lag in public fundraising indicates a potential requirement for centralized, direct government funding to maintain critical non-military operational support (e.g., drone procurement, medical logistics) as public resources become strained.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF cognitive strategy is shifting from infiltration (leaks) to exploitation (amplification and pressure).

• Defeatism Narrative (KINETIC LINK): RF sources are circulating fabricated quotes from US officials predicting "inevitable Ukrainian defeat" and arguing that Russia has infinite resources. This narrative is directly timed to coincide with the kinetic assault, aiming to break military resolve. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Negotiation Chaos: RF continues to push detailed, false narratives about ongoing peace negotiations involving territorial compromise and army limitations, directly targeting the legitimacy of the NCA.
• Foreign Legitimacy: Putin's continued diplomatic activities (Kyrgyzstan visit) are used to project stability, competence, and normalization, sharply contrasting with the manufactured chaos in Kyiv.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is demonstrably under stress, evidenced by the observed drop in crowdfunding/fundraising activity (STERNENKO report). This suggests the RF strategy of simultaneous kinetic and cognitive strikes is successfully taxing the resilience of the civil society support structure.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The weaponization of the NATO SG's statement about the war ending by "end of 2025" is intended to introduce temporal uncertainty and encourage the perception that strategic allies have already mentally accepted a negotiated settlement favorable to Russia.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces will achieve definitive control of the T-05-15 GLOC (Rodynske sector) NLT 261200Z, forcing UAF tactical units to transition from defense to emergency disengagement or risk encirclement. This ground success will be immediately followed by a wave of synchronized IO focusing on the fall of the GLOC as a political defeat, further pressing the NCA for concessions. Fixation operations at Huliaipole and KAB strikes will continue to prevent reinforcement.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF executes a follow-up synchronized ballistic strike utilizing Iskander-M or similar platforms targeting the exposed Poltava/Vinnytsia C2 backup nodes NLT 261800Z. This strike aims to capitalize on the confirmed AD vulnerability to achieve command decapitation, potentially forcing an operational pause or large-scale retreat on the Eastern Front, which the RF ground forces would instantly exploit.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT & RESERVE AUTHORIZATION (J3/NCA)

1. EXECUTE RESERVE RELEASE: The political window is closed. The National Command Authority must authorize the immediate deployment of Reserve Force Bravo NLT 261100Z to execute a prepared defensive line or cover the controlled withdrawal (CTW) of forward units on the Pokrovsk axis. (HIGH PRIORITY)
2. RE-TASK EASTERN FIRE SUPPORT: Immediately allocate maximum dedicated deep-strike and Counter-Battery Fire (CBF) assets to suppress RF logistical consolidation points and artillery positions around Rodynske/T-05-15 corridor, buying the few critical hours necessary for Reserve Bravo arrival or CTW execution.

R-2: BALLISTIC DEFENSE REDEPLOYMENT (AD Command)

1. C2 ASSET HARDENING: Assume the MDCOA is executing. Initiate the emergency deployment sequence of PAC-3/SAMP-T or equivalent systems to establish a protected bubble over the Poltava and Vinnytsia C2 backup nodes NLT 261400Z. This is a survivability requirement.
2. EW SITE PROTECTION: Task local SHORAD units to increase protection and deception measures around known high-value UAF EW sites (e.g., 69th Center) now identified by RF intelligence, to mitigate targeted kinetic strikes.

R-3: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND MORALE (NCA/J2 IO)

1. AMPLIFY COUNTER-NARRATIVE: Immediately amplify Vice Admiral Hnatov's statement (debunking the "troop limit" lie) via all government and military channels. Link this official denial directly to the physical attacks (KABs, kinetic assault) to demonstrate coordinated RF lies and violence.
2. CIVIL SUPPORT CALL: NCA must issue a direct, high-level appeal to the public acknowledging the stress (linking it to the drop in fundraising) and requesting immediate civil mobilization/support, framing it as the critical resistance to the enemy's psychological warfare.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS