Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-11-26 06:34:28Z
3 months ago
Previous (2025-11-26 06:13:56Z)

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 260800Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: GLOC SEVERANCE IMMINENT. MULTI-AXIS DEEP STRIKE CONFIRMED. RF IO REACHES CRITICAL THRESHOLD FOR NCA PARALYSIS.


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational window for critical reserve deployment (NLT 260730Z) has lapsed. RF forces are positioned for immediate kinetic exploitation along the Pokrovsk Axis.

  • Pokrovsk Axis: RF maneuver elements are assessed to be within striking distance of the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC) near Rodynske. Units remaining forward of Phase Line Alpha are now at extreme risk of encirclement and high attrition. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Deep Strike Synchronization: The enemy is executing simultaneous, synchronized deep strikes, forcing UAF Air Defense (AD) dispersal:
    • Confirmed hostile UAS ingress targeting Dnipro City (Logistical and C2 hub) remains the primary threat (260626Z confirmation).
    • New hostile UAS vector confirmed targeting Odesa City (260622Z) from the southeast. This requires immediate reallocation of southern AD assets, reducing concentration planned for Dnipro. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No change. Environmental factors continue to favor RF mechanized infiltration and UAS operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

Frontline units on the Pokrovsk axis are assumed to be initiating Controlled Tactical Withdrawal (CTW) based on the previous critical assessment, though confirmation is pending. The sudden expansion of the deep-strike axis (Dnipro and Odesa) dramatically complicates AD resource management, lowering kinetic protection for critical C2 nodes.


2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent remains synchronized destruction: Ground breakthrough coordinated with strategic cognitive paralysis and logistical interdiction.

  • Kinetic Synchronization: The enemy demonstrates the capability to synchronize high-intensity ground assault (Pokrovsk) with multi-axis deep strikes (Dnipro, Odesa). This forces the defense to choose between defending logistics (Dnipro/Odesa) or C2 (Poltava/Vinnytsia). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • IO Intensification (Weaponized Diplomacy): RF has weaponized alleged leaks of back-channel communications (Witkoff tapes, 260615Z) to substantiate claims of imminent surrender and Western abandonment. This is designed to maximize UAF National Command Authority (NCA) paralysis precisely when field commanders require maximum autonomy for CTW execution. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • RF Information Operations (TASS/Rostec): RF media is actively disseminating disinformation attempting to discredit NATO air assets (F-16/Mirage claims, 260626Z), likely anticipating Western jet deployment and aiming to degrade pilot confidence.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation is the confirmation of a dual-axis UAS strike (Dnipro/Odesa), validating the RF ability to pressure multiple strategic logistics and transit hubs simultaneously. This adaptation confirms the effectiveness of feints used in previous targeting cycles. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are adequate. UAF logistics are under direct kinetic threat due to the targeting of Dnipro and Odesa, which serve as crucial transit points for Eastern and Southern Commands.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly synchronized across the kinetic and cognitive domains. UAF C2 remains under extreme pressure. The IO pressure wave (alleged US demands for all Donetsk, troop limits, and NATO denial) has reached a critical intensity point designed to prevent decisive, decentralized command action. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)


3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: CRITICAL/DEGRADING on the Pokrovsk axis. AD posture is dangerously diluted due to the dual-axis deep strike threat. READINESS: AD forces are attempting dynamic reallocation under combat conditions. Failure to confirm CTW status means a high probability of severe attrition within the hour.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: Confirmation of synchronized UAS strikes on two separate, high-value logistics nodes (Dnipro/Odesa), indicating successful RF intelligence preparation and targeting. Setback: RF IO success in leveraging internal Western political narratives (Witkoff leak) to achieve peak psychological effect during the ground assault.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PRIORITY REQUIREMENT: Immediate AD decision on asset allocation between the two concurrent deep-strike threats (Dnipro vs. Odesa). CONSTRAINT: Political paralysis exacerbated by the IO campaign continues to be the primary operational constraint against timely kinetic decisions (R-1).


4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF IO campaign has achieved maximum effect density and synchronization with kinetic action. Key vectors:

  1. Direct Capitulation Demands (260615Z): Alleged "Witkoff tapes" claiming US negotiators demand control of ALL of Donetsk Oblast, validating RF ground offensive objectives as a political inevitability.
  2. External Validation of Surrender Terms (260632Z): CNN coverage confirming UAF refusal of key components of a peace plan (territorial concessions, troop limits, NATO denial) frames Kyiv as the obstacle to peace, fueling internal dissent.
  3. Domestic Normalization (260633Z): Volodin's assertion that Europeans are moving to Russia aims to subtly normalize Russia's global standing and minimize the impact of Western sanctions or diplomatic pressure.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is being tested by the simultaneous tactical failure (Pokrovsk) and strategic political threat (Weaponized Diplomacy). The specificity of the alleged demands (All Donetsk, troop limits) provides clear, demoralizing objectives for the RF.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The international environment is hostile toward UAF operational autonomy. While Montenegro's visa move (260622Z) signals diplomatic tightening against Russia, the immediate and overriding political signal is the alleged US back-channel diplomacy, which directly undercuts UAF resolve.


5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces will achieve operational GLOC severance near Rodynske NLT 260900Z. Simultaneously, the confirmed UAS ingress will precede synchronized high-value missile strikes (Kalibr/Iskander) targeting the Dnipro rail/logistics hub NLT 260830Z and potentially the Odesa port infrastructure NLT 260930Z. The combined effect is to achieve tactical victory at Pokrovsk while crippling immediate UAF reinforcement capabilities.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF achieves decisive rout on the Pokrovsk axis. This tactical success is immediately leveraged by precision strikes targeting Dnipro and Odesa, followed by an effective decapitation strike against the remaining designated backup operational C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia or supporting communications infrastructure), achieving total administrative and logistical paralysis of Eastern/Center Commands and compromising Southern sustainment.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

EventEstimated Timeline (NLT)ConfidenceStatus/Action Required
CTW Execution (Pokrovsk Sector)260815ZCRITICALIMMEDIATE VERIFICATION. Field C2 must confirm all exposed units are executing mandatory withdrawal to Phase Line Alpha.
Dnipro Kinetic Strike260830ZHIGHAD must be fully postured to mitigate this single-axis deep strike.
RF GLOC Secure (Rodynske Sector)260900ZHIGHTactical depth achieved; remaining UAF units are trapped.
Odesa Kinetic Strike260930ZMEDIUMAD assets must be deployed to protect port/rail infrastructure.

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT & CONTINGENCY EXECUTION (J3/Eastern Command)

  1. DECENTRALIZED CTW CONFIRMATION: Eastern Command (J3-East) must utilize alternate/redundant communications (SATCOM, encrypted runners) to confirm the physical withdrawal status of all units exposed near Rodynske NLT 260815Z. Assume communications failure is RF priority.
  2. PRIORITY RELOCATION: If CTW is confirmed, J3 must prioritize the rapid movement of the new defensive line (Phase Line Alpha) towards pre-planned, mutually supporting artillery fire zones to break RF pursuit.

R-2: AIR DEFENSE AND TARGET PROTECTION (AD Command)

  1. DNIPRO vs. ODESA RESOURCE TRADE-OFF: AD Command must immediately execute a priority matrix: DNIPRO (C2/Main Rail) protection must maintain 80% of allocated MRAD/SHORAD resources. Odesa logistics protection receives 20%, relying heavily on local mobile units. Dnipro loss ensures total Eastern front collapse; Odesa loss threatens long-term Southern sustainment.
  2. C2 NODE HARDENING: Reinforce SHORAD coverage over Poltava/Vinnytsia immediately, utilizing fixed-site assets where available, recognizing the severe threat dilution caused by the dual strike.

R-3: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND COUNTER-IO (NCA/J2 IO)

  1. AGGRESSIVE COUNTER-IO (ALL-DOMAIN): NCA must publish an immediate statement (NLT 260815Z) confirming the Pokrovsk assault and the Dnipro/Odesa strikes are occurring simultaneously with the RF IO campaign. Frame the alleged diplomatic pressure (Witkoff/Trump plan) as an explicit declaration of war aims (control of all Donetsk), thereby stiffening resolve against capitulation.
  2. REJECT TROOP LIMITS: Publicly reject the "800,000 troop cap" narrative as a direct violation of sovereignty and a precursor to genocide, maximizing domestic pressure against political compromise.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

PriorityGap/RequirementConfidenceTasking Rationale
1 (CRITICAL)IMINT confirmation of physical penetration depth and control of the T-05-15 GLOC (Rodynske area).CRITICALDefine the new operational Phase Line and fire support requirements (R-1).
2 (CRITICAL)ISR/ELINT validation of specific missile launch indicators/target acquisition on Odesa City.HIGHDetermine the scale and type of strike (Missile vs. UAS saturation) to optimize AD (R-2).
3 (HIGH)SIGINT monitoring of RF C2 channels for success indicators (e.g., confirmation of Witkoff IO success or failure to achieve desired C2 paralysis).CRITICALGauge the effectiveness of R-3 counter-IO efforts.
4 (MEDIUM)HUMINT/OSINT collection to verify the authenticity and full transcript of the alleged "Witkoff tapes" (260615Z).MEDIUMEssential for shaping long-term diplomatic strategy and defining NCA negotiating red lines.
Previous (2025-11-26 06:13:56Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.