Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 260730Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: HIGH PROBABILITY GLOC SEVERANCE IMMINENT. DEEP STRIKE AXIS SHIFTED TO DNIPRO. C2 PARALYSIS EXACERBATED BY HIGH-LEVEL DIPLOMATIC IO.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The situation remains CRITICAL along the Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk Axis. The final window for reserve intervention (NLT 260730Z) has expired without confirmation of ‘Force Echo’ deployment.

• Pokrovsk Axis: RF ground forces are assessed to be in position for the final push to sever the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC) near Rodynske. The kinetic breakthrough is expected within the next 90 minutes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Flanking Fixation: RF forces continue to focus kinetic operations on the southern flank near Otradne/Andriivka, confirmed by recent RF military blogger activity, reinforcing the intent to fix UAF reserves in Dnipropetrovsk region. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Vector SHIFT: Confirmed hostile UAS transit toward Dnipro City (260600Z+). This mandates an immediate shift in AD prioritization, replacing Kremenchuk as the immediate MLCOA target. Dnipro represents a critical logistical hub and potential C2 node. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No change. Low visibility continues to favor RF mechanized infiltration and UAS operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

Frontline units on the Pokrovsk axis are in an EXTREMELY DEGRADED posture, operating without confirmed coverage for withdrawal. Units must be transitioning to Controlled Tactical Withdrawal (CTW) protocols to prevent encirclement. The new threat vector to Dnipro further dilutes AD resources meant to protect C2 and logistics.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is the synchronized tactical destruction of the Pokrovsk defense sector combined with strategic cognitive paralysis.

• Tactical Adaptation (Deep Strike): The shift from Kremenchuk to Dnipro indicates RF prioritizes immediate logistical interdiction and C2 disruption closer to the active front. Dnipro serves as the primary rail/road connection and troop transit point for the Pokrovsk sector.
• Strategic IO Synchronization: RF is actively weaponizing confirmation of high-level US diplomatic activity (Witkoff/Kushner visit to Moscow) and critical Western political warnings (US Army Minister statement advising peace talks) to maximize UAF NCA paralysis precisely when the ground assault peaks. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation is the confirmation of hostile UAS ingress targeting Dnipro City (260600Z), validating the use of the previous threat to Kryvyi Rih as a highly effective feint. This confirms the RF ability to rapidly shift deep-strike targeting based on UAF AD posturing.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are sufficient to sustain the current tempo of operations. The focus on Dnipro suggests an attempt to degrade UAF ability to rapidly move reserves or ammunition forward, ensuring sustainment issues will compound the impending tactical rout.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly effective and synchronized. UAF C2 remains CRITICALLY IMPAIRED due to the confluence of:

1. Failure to confirm critical reserve movement (Force Echo).
2. The maximum intensity of RF IO campaigns targeting NCA decision-making. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: ROUT IMMINENT on the Pokrovsk axis unless CTW is executed effectively. READINESS: AD readiness is strained by the dynamic shift in deep-strike threat axis. Failure to confirm the status of 'Force Echo' means units must be assumed exposed.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: Failure to meet the 260730Z critical reserve confirmation deadline, leaving the T-05-15 GLOC exposed. Setback: RF successfully shifted the deep strike focus to a highly critical, high-value target (Dnipro City).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PRIORITY REQUIREMENT: Immediate AD reallocation to defend Dnipro City against the confirmed kinetic threat. Authorization for pre-planned defensive barriers and demolition protocols must be released along Phase Line Alpha (west of Rodynske). CONSTRAINT: Overriding political constraint and IO-induced paralysis continue to hamper timely, decisive kinetic command decisions.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The RF IO campaign has achieved maximum effect, directly influencing operational timelines. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Key vectors include:

1. Diplomatic Ultimatum: Formal confirmation of the Witkoff-Moscow trip (260609Z) is being used to solidify the narrative that the US is bypassing Kyiv to dictate surrender terms.
2. External Pressure Validation: Dissemination of US Army Minister warnings (260609Z) provides independent, high-level validation of the "inevitable defeat" narrative, severely undermining NCA resolve.
3. C2 Node Vulnerability: RF IO is actively mocking UAF C2 effectiveness (e.g., reports of Yermak being 'sullen' after Trump's posts), aimed at reducing domestic confidence in leadership during the crisis.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale is facing the greatest stress since the start of the current offensive. The confluence of simultaneous tactical failure (Pokrovsk) and strategic political abandonment (US diplomatic signals) risks widespread psychological fatigue. (DSB: Psychological Impact: Morale Decline for Ukraine is present, though small, indicating the IO campaign is impacting the data environment.)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The international support environment is weaponized against UAF operations. While US support mechanisms remain physically in place, the perceived political will to sustain the fight has been severely degraded by the coordinated RF IO campaign.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces will achieve operational depth past the T-05-15 GLOC near Rodynske NLT 260900Z, forcing frontline units into high-risk disengagement or destruction. Simultaneously, the confirmed UAS ingress will precede a synchronized high-value missile strike against the Dnipro rail/logistics hub and associated C2 facilities NLT 260830Z. This action aims to cut off the Pokrovsk defense sector from crucial rear area support.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a decisive rout on the Pokrovsk axis. This tactical success is immediately leveraged by a second wave of precision strikes (Iskander/Kalibr) targeting the previously targeted C2/logistics node in Dnipro, followed by a precision strike on the designated backup operational C2 nodes in Poltava/Vinnytsia (or their critical energy supply), achieving total administrative and logistical paralysis of the Eastern/Center Commands.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT & CONTINGENCY EXECUTION (J3/Eastern Command)

1. IMMEDIATE CTW EXECUTION: Given the elapsed critical deadline (260730Z) and the failure to confirm Force Echo, J3 must issue explicit, decentralized orders for all exposed UAF elements west of Rodynske to initiate pre-planned Controlled Tactical Withdrawal (CTW) to Phase Line Alpha NLT 260745Z. Assume RF maneuver elements are already in flank positions.
2. DEMOLITION PROTOCOLS: Authorize immediate execution of barrier and demolition protocols on key infrastructure along the T-05-15 route to delay RF exploitation.

R-2: AIR DEFENSE AND TARGET PROTECTION (AD Command)

1. DNIPRO AD RE-PRIORITIZATION: IMMEDIATELY re-task all mobile MRAD/SHORAD assets originally earmarked for Kremenchuk to high-value infrastructure defense in Dnipro City (Rail/Logistics/C2 nodes). Assume Dnipro is the immediate kinetic MLCOA.
2. C2 Node Resiliency: Maintain heightened SHORAD coverage over backup C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia) regardless of the Dnipro strike status, anticipating the MDCOA follow-up strike.

R-3: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND COUNTER-IO (NCA/J2 IO)

1. DECENTRALIZED COMMAND SIGNALING (URGENT): NCA must issue a public signal (NLT 260745Z) stating that operational command decisions for CTW and defensive maneuvers are temporarily delegated to field commanders (East/Center) to ensure kinetic speed in crisis conditions. This mitigates the IO narrative of C2 paralysis.
2. COUNTER US OFFICIAL WARNINGS: J2 IO must proactively counter the "inevitable defeat" narrative by immediately highlighting the RF ground assault (Pokrovsk) and deep strike (Dnipro) as proof that negotiations under pressure constitute capitulation, not peace.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS