Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-11-26 05:43:56Z
3 months ago
Previous (2025-11-26 05:13:53Z)

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 260700Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: POKROVSK AXIS: HIGH PROBABILITY OF GLOC SEVERANCE. IO CAMPAIGN ACHIEVES NEAR-TOTAL C2 PARALYSIS. REQUIRE IMMEDIATE CONFIRMATION OF RESERVE FORCE ECHO POSTURE.


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains critically unstable, centered on the Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk Axis. RF forces are exploiting the failure of UAF reserves to materialize NLT 260430Z.

  • Pokrovsk Axis: RF pressure continues to endanger the T-05-15 Ground Line of Communication (GLOC). The window for establishing a linear blocking position has closed (NLT 260630Z). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Southern Flank/Otradne: RF sources confirm active kinetic operations (fixed-wing bombing/KABs) against Andriivka (west of Otradne). This validates the previous assessment of a RF attempt to fix or exploit a tactical breakthrough in the southern Dnipropetrovsk administrative border area, preventing UAF reserve deployment northwards. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Deep Strike Vector:
    • Kryvyi Rih: Mayor Vilkul reported the situation as "CONTROLLED" as of 260533Z. This suggests the previously identified hostile BPL was either intercepted, deterred, or was a deliberate fixation feint. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Kremenchuk: Status is unknown. Given the Kryvyi Rih status, Kremenchuk remains the highest priority deep kinetic target, consistent with the MLCOA forecast.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No significant operational change. Low visibility and winter conditions continue to favor RF mechanized infiltration and deep-strike targeting operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

Frontline units are in a Critical/Degraded posture. Lack of confirmed reserve deployment indicates that the primary control measure (linear defense reinforcement) has failed. Units must now transition to pre-planned controlled tactical withdrawal (CTW) protocols to avoid being encircled and destroyed.


2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is the irreversible collapse of the Pokrovsk defense sector, achieved primarily through sustained kinetic pressure and leveraging pervasive Information Operations (IO) to ensure UAF National Command Authority (NCA) paralysis and delay kinetic response.

  • Tactical Focus: RF is increasing synchronization between ground assaults on the main axis (Pokrovsk) and flanking kinetic fixation (Andriivka/Otradne area). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Strategic IO Synchronization: RF is effectively weaponizing specific, high-level Western political statements (e.g., Trump's comments on "Russian concessions" being merely a ceasefire and no more land capture; US official warnings of 'inevitable defeat'). The purpose is to cement the narrative of unavoidable UAF defeat precisely when critical operational reserve commitments are required. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - Supported by DSB focus on Propaganda/Morale Decline).
  • Logistics Warfare: RF IO is attempting to undermine long-term logistical confidence by disseminating claims of significant (1.5 year) delays in Western ammunition deliveries.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the shift in the deep strike profile: using the threat against Kryvyi Rih as a feint (or distraction) to fix AD assets, while the primary Kremenchuk threat remains unconfirmed but highly probable. The active use of bombers on the Otradne flank indicates RF is confident enough to commit high-value air assets to secondary attack vectors.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Sufficient to sustain the current tempo. RF continues long-term signaling (Putin's Strategy until 2036) to project stability and strategic endurance, contrasting UAF perceived short-term crises. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly adaptive and synchronized across kinetic and cognitive domains. UAF C2 effectiveness remains CRITICALLY DEGRADED due to IO-induced paralysis preventing tactical maneuver decisions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)


3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: EXTREME RISK OF ROUT. The failure to confirm the deployment of 'Force Echo' NLT 260630Z implies exposed units must assume the blocking position will not be established in time to cover withdrawal. READINESS: While AD appears to have managed the immediate threat to Kryvyi Rih, overall readiness is severely taxed due to dual-axis protection demands (Kremenchuk/C2 nodes). UAF General Staff morale reporting (980 RF losses) is high, but this does not substitute for physical force commitment.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: Likely failure to execute critical reserve deployment timeline (NLT 260630Z). Success: Successful defense/deterrence of the immediate kinetic threat against Kryvyi Rih (260533Z status update).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PRIORITY REQUIREMENT: Immediate, decentralized C2 authorization for CTW protocols if 'Force Echo' status is not confirmed in the next 30 minutes. AD assets must be prioritized for Kremenchuk (MLCOA deep strike) and C2 nodes (MDCOA decapitation). CONSTRAINT: Political/diplomatic IO remains the overriding constraint on operational maneuver decisions.


4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The IO environment is dominated by the strategic messaging designed to force political capitulation:

  1. Surrender Framing: RF propaganda (amplified by pro-Kremlin channels) is exploiting Donald Trump’s comments, suggesting that Russia’s only required concession is to "cease hostilities and capture no more lands." This frames the conflict outcome as a de facto surrender where Ukraine yields currently occupied territory, and that delay is futile.
  2. External Validation: Dissemination of US official warnings ("inevitable defeat") acts as external validation of the surrender narrative, fracturing international support perceptions.
  3. UK/US Division: RF is leveraging the Bloomberg/Witkoff leaked audio to suggest US/UK diplomatic disunity, further increasing strategic confusion within NATO and the UAF NCA.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Sentiment is under severe pressure. While UAF counter-propaganda output is strong (daily RF losses), the relentless stream of external diplomatic threats and military setbacks risks generating mass psychological fatigue and acceptance of defeatist narratives (DSB: Morale Decline 0.083).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF campaign has succeeded in making international political rhetoric the operational risk factor. NCA inability to navigate this IO threat translates directly into delayed kinetic operations and battlefield failure.


5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces will achieve operational depth past the T-05-15 GLOC near Rodynske NLT 260900Z, likely forcing exposed UAF elements to abandon heavy equipment during a hurried withdrawal. Simultaneously, RF will launch the high-value synchronized strike against Kremenchuk (NLT 260800Z), capitalizing on the fixation efforts used near Kryvyi Rih.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF forces achieve a localized operational rout on the Pokrovsk axis. This success is immediately followed by a precision strike (Iskander/Kalibr) targeting the Kremenchuk logistics hub AND the designated operational C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia), aimed at total administrative and logistical decapitation simultaneous with the tactical crisis.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

EventEstimated Timeline (NLT)ConfidenceStatus/Action Required
Confirmation of Force Echo Status260730ZCRITICALC2/J3 MUST CONFIRM physical movement or inability to move. This is the final window for decisive action.
Kremenchuk Strike260800ZHIGHAD must be fully postured to mitigate this single-axis deep strike.
RF GLOC Secure (Rodynske Sector)260900ZHIGHCTW protocols must be initiated by exposed UAF units before this time.
MDCOA Decapitation Strike261200ZMEDIUMContinuous AD coverage of Poltava/Vinnytsia is mandatory.

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: FORCE MANAGEMENT & CONTINGENCY EXECUTION (J3/Eastern Command)

  1. IMMEDIATE FORCE ECHO STATUS CHECK: The 260630Z NLT for establishing a blocking position has passed. J3 must use redundant communication paths (SATCOM/HF) to verify the physical grid coordinates of 'Force Echo' NLT 260730Z.
  2. IF NO CONFIRMATION: If verification of Force Echo deployment fails by 260730Z, all exposed UAF units west of Rodynske must be ordered to execute Controlled Tactical Withdrawal (CTW) protocols immediately and fall back to the pre-designated Phase Line Alpha. Withdrawal orders must be decentralized to company/platoon level if higher C2 remains paralyzed.

R-2: AIR DEFENSE AND TARGET PROTECTION (AD Command)

  1. KREMENCHUK AD MAXIMIZATION: Given the successful mitigation/feint at Kryvyi Rih, re-prioritize all mobile SHORAD/MRAD assets originally earmarked for Kryvyi Rih to Kremenchuk (rail/energy hub) defense NLT 260745Z. Assume Kremenchuk is the immediate kinetic MLCOA.
  2. C2 Node Contingency: Maintain 100% dedicated SHORAD coverage over backup C2 nodes (Poltava/Vinnytsia) to ensure resiliency against the MDCOA decapitation strike.

R-3: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND COUNTER-IO (NCA/J2 IO)

  1. DECENTRALIZED COMMAND SIGNALING: NCA must issue an urgent internal/external communication (NLT 260730Z) explicitly stating that operational command is temporarily decentralized to regional commands (East/Center) to ensure kinetic decisions are not delayed by IO-induced diplomatic uncertainty.
  2. COUNTER-TRUMP NARRATIVE: Immediately counter the 'Russian concession' narrative by linking it directly to the humanitarian crisis caused by the RF strikes (e.g., Zaporizhzhia civilian casualties) and framing the talk of 'ceasefire without withdrawal' as a diplomatic cover for war crimes.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

PriorityGap/RequirementConfidenceTasking Rationale
1 (CRITICAL)IMINT/UAS confirmation of physical grid coordinates and movement status of 'Force Echo.'CRITICALDetermine if CTW is mandatory or if a covering force exists (R-1).
2 (CRITICAL)ISR validation of specific target type (rail, energy, military depot) within Kremenchuk targeted by deep strike assets.HIGHOptimize AD point defense (R-2) and plan post-strike logistics diversion.
3 (HIGH)IMINT/SIGINT verification of RF presence and penetration depth near Siversk and Otradne/Andriivka.CRITICALVerify the need for strategic reserve allocation to the northern or southern flanks.
4 (MEDIUM)SIGINT monitoring of RF C2 channels for confirmation of ground assault success indicators (capture of Rodynske/T-05-15).MEDIUMProvide early warning of breakthrough for mandatory CTW initiation (R-1).
Previous (2025-11-26 05:13:53Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.